Discussion in 'Intelligence & Machines' started by identityless, Jan 3, 2006.
So, fake women are better? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
I won't post the link directly but if you google on REALDOLL you can see just how much better than the real thing fake women can be (kidding... maybe...).
LOL, your not kidding!!! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
that's ok. I mean, with AI or machine you can at least shut it off when you don't want it.
There's no taking care of it. And having to nurture or buy it anything. Except parts and obviously a bath. *thinking*
You could turn it on when ever you want it. But there wouldn't be any surprise in that. No make up sex. No thoughts, just mimicked facts. Sounds like most women in Beverly hills. HAHAHAA... sorry.
I don't know... Just seems so sad in a way.
about the skeleton being archaic...
a human skeleton, if you think about it, has had one of the longest trial runs of any mechanical system: hundreds of thousands of years, as compared to our technologies' couple of decades of robotics. sure, it's not as cool looking as a artificial-muscle and titanium-sheethed robotic arm, but it's probably a very optimal structure that needs very little modification.
but i wouldn't want to see a woman's skeleton either, that'd just be a taaaad wierd.
Fake women can't shoot you down. Also, they seem to bat their eyes and pant a lot, and never ever spell it "womyn". They don't read Gloria Steinem. "Gloria who? *giggle giggle*"
Geeeez...AI women fantasies...some days it's kind of embarassing to be a male. And some days, we just don't think about it and hit "Save as..." anyway.
It's a hit and miss kind of thing, male morality.
Come on, don't tease us like that.
Separate names with a comma.