BB is an incomplete theory . A System Universe is more complete.

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by river, Mar 3, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    riv, if you have an idea to put forth, it behooves you to be able to explain it.
    Why would anyone put thought into your ideas when you haven't even bothered to put any thought in yourself?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. globali Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    292
    Also river still hasn't responded to all the important questions in post#87.

    My impression is that river has his own personal definitions of scientific terms, which make it impossible for him to communicate his thoughts. What he thinks that dimensions are probably is different from what all people know https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension#Spatial_dimensions
    He also has his own personal definition of what a point is, etc
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    [QUOTE="James R, post: 3567601, member: 4402"

    The problem with your hypothesis involving the cold superfluid or whatever is that there's nothing testable in it, as you have presented your idea so far.[/QUOTE]

    True .

    By collision of superfluid energy flow .





    Questions , Questions , upon Questions .

    Good
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    E=mC^2

    C^2 cancels out

    E=m

    But does

    M = E

    From E=m ?
     
  8. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    Why does c^2 cancel out? You just don't like it?

    It is a constant that makes the units work out to tell you exactly how much M is in E.

    If you have no need for units then what you get is a proportion:

    E~M
    i.e E is proportional to M (i.e double the M will give you double the E)
     
  9. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    C^2 , is based on the speed of light , per second / per second , both cancel each other out .

    Hence you end up with ; E = M .
     
  10. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    E=mC^2
    C^2 cancels out

    E=m

    But does

    M = E

    From E=m ?

    Is the equation actually equal ?
     
  11. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    You just repeated yourself word for word.
     
  12. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    This is not how you math.

    It is speed of light TIMES speed of light: m^2/s^2.
     
  13. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    Not equal; proportional.

    Two grams of mass converted to energy will yield twice as much energy as one gram of mass.

    If you want to know exactly how much energy, you will need to multiply it by c^2.
     
  14. river

    Messages:
    17,307
     
  15. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Why ? Why would I need to multiply energy by c^2 ?
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2019
  16. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    Asking questions. Good. That's much better than making stuff up.

    Because mass is measured as grams and energy is measured as ergs - which has the unit g⋅cm^2/s^2.

    1 gram of mass does not "equal" 1 erg of energy.

    You can't compare them, any more than you can compare velocity (d/s) with distance (d) - unless you divide the distance by t (d/s).

    Look at the unit of energy again - the erg: g⋅cm^2/s^2.

    You'll notice the distance-squared-divided-by-time-squared in there.
    c^2 is measures in distance-squared-divided-by-time-squared.



    A formula must have the same units one each side of the equals sign.

    So:

    m=g (1 gram)
    E=g⋅cm^2/s^2
    (1 erg)
    Not equivalent.


    But you can make them equivalent by multiplying the m side by cm^2/s^2. In other words, multiply by c^2.
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2019
  17. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,397
    No it doesn't.

    No.

    Please stop trolling.
     
  18. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    E=m

    Because the energy out put is equal to form of mass .

    Fission .

    E=m and m=E are equal .

    Because the mass never changes .
     
  19. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    They are proportionate.

    Allow me to use an analogy to show the difference:

    Snow melts into water.
    The amount of water you get is proportional to the amount of water you start with: W~S.
    i.e. If you double the amount of snow you start with it will double the amount of water you end up with.
    If you treble the amount of snow you start with it will treble the amount of water you end up with.
    But no where in there does it tell you how to equate snow with water.
    To-wit: How much water do you get out of snow?

    It turns out out that 1 litre of snow will melt into 1/10 litre of water.
    Now you have an equation:
    W=0.1S

    The 0.1 is a constant, required to convert a proportionality into an equivalence.


    So:
    Mass coverts to energy and energy converts to mass.
    The amount of energy you can get is proportional to the amount of mass you start with.
    Double the mass in and you double the energy out, etc.

    But so far, it doesn't tell you how to equate them.

    The constant, in this case, is c^2 or 9 x 10^16 m^2 / s^2.

    And now you know how much energy you can get out of a given mass.
     
  20. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Exactly .

    Now go back to my post # 135 .
     
  21. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    Oh for Pete's sake.

    You say wrong stuff off the top of your head.
    I correct you.
    Then you say 'Exactly' and point us back at the wrong stuff off the top of your head.
     
  22. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    What " wrong stuff " Dave ?
     
  23. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    :sigh:
    E does not equal m.
    c^2 does not cancel out.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page