Backgrounds in moderation

how is that working out for you?

/chuckle

get your ass back into the "James R's Independent Review Process" thread. i have tons of questions regarding your slap downs

excellent
comedy hour with james r
gather around children

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Then someone would have to do his administrator job.

Do you have anyone in mind?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

There's three others on the list.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Who are barely ever here.

 

Run a campaign.

 

You people are shameless.
And Tiassa, why do you feel the need to attack James like this in public? Don't you think this should be discussed either in private or in the mod-forum? Currently it looks like you're just a bit too happy leading the lynch-mob.
I think this whole situation is completely intolerable. At least one person should be banned right away; quadraphonics. Why didn't you ban him, Tiassa? I can see why James didn't.

 

you never will
you lack the intellect nor the integrity to actually want to do so. all you do is pervert and spin the historical record in order to paint yourself as some tragic hero being maligned by the forces of darkness.

listen up, colonel james, if the few mods that do have integrity did not speak up on my goddamn behalf, i would still be as you thuggishly put it, "slapped down". they take the heat for your utterly reprehensible approach to moderating an internet forum

or do you imagine you could have figured all this shit on your own and bring it upon yourself to rectify the missteps??

and that bit exemplifies the sheer depravity and degradation of morals that this thing utilities and imagine to be the norm. the sky has been falling on my head for utterly bogus reasons in the form of his thuggish slap downs. the bogus bans that this freak of nature still refuses to justify with even the barest of logical rationale

that will never happen, james. your depravities will be aired in the public forums to see. you have to be forced and shamed to do the right thing. it is only when your back is against the wall and you see no way of sliming your skanky ass out of your latest mess that you come out and address the issues while heroically proclaiming your ass is the victim in all this and how actually magnanimous you fucking are

i mean you couldn't even maintain a bogus two week ban and i am supposed to be grateful that you did not thuggishly slap me down for a month?

seriously?
you are a goddamn sociopath, james. we all know this

thanks to whom? you? your goons, fraggle and hercules who are content to heil and goosestep in your basement?

haha
you fool no one. your infamous grudges and hatred are personal attributes you simply cannot conceal nor disguise no matter how hard you try

well we shall resume discussing the poster, word by fucking word.
lets here your defense of its deletion

i knew you were fucking lying when you said you consulted with other mods. your action had only your characteristic slime and megalomania smeared all over it. how disingenuous of you, james to create some fictitious event and players. were you panicking?

/sneer

 

Oh, was that the topic...

-------------------------

Gustav,
I admire your guts. Addressing an admin the way you do while have 4 active infraction points. If I were James, I would have awarded you with a permanent ban.
Edit: Sorry, my mistake. Make that 5 active infraction points.

 

attack? the cur is being held responsible for his actions. an admin that calls me "stupid", a "lackey" and has no problem announcing my bogus bans in fucking public, acts like a fucking goon....

and what, we are supposed to what? roll over and give ass like you do? you want respect? goddamn earn it!

 

Responsibility, Gustav?
You have set the stage for this yourself.
As for you being called "stupid" and "lacky", if that's true he should not have done that. But then, you are being a complete hypocrite for complaining about it.

 

jeez
i am not complaining
i am saying that the fucking tenor of the fucking discourse is not fucking one-sided.

james is not the victim!
i am!
get that into the empty space you call a brain

none of this would have happened if james merely deleted and warned
his vindictiveness and hatred prevented him from ever considering that alternative

and look where we are now
you think i fucking wanted this?

 

you are a goddamn troll fueling the fire, aint ya?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

an implicit admission of error was made when my ban was terminated prematurely. one would imagine an apology but all i got was further abuse. nor was the fucking infraction reversed

but that is the plan, yes?
to keep me on my last legs, my existence, a whim or fancy of the nazi contingent in sci

heil, enmos

/spits

 

The problem is that you are at 5 infraction points. Anyone else would have been perma-banned by now.

It's starting to look like it. Why did you bring Spurious into this?

 

shut the fuck up, noob
you lack the fucking credentials to be talking to me

ask someone else to hold your goddamn hand

 

Notes Around

How nice of you to ignore the examples I pointed out.

Was a time when that was considered intellectually dishonest, James. But now that you need to do it? Well, just like lying, and just like ignoring evidence on the record while simply reiterating false accusations, it's apparently not problematic anymore.

That's likely coming, James. We already know that Plazma doesn't give a fuck what you do to this forum. There is little left this staff can do to improve conditions as long as you're here.

You are a cancer on this community, and I'm afraid it's terminal. Sciforums is wrecked beyond any reasonable repair.

You don't get to play the victim here, James. Your years of dishonesty, intellectual and otherwise, have poisoned this place.

You are the problem.

Before any solutions that might improve this community can have a chance at success, you need to go.

And you easily could have answered the question instead of ducking it.

James, there seems to be a reason you want things out of public view: You are incapable of answering honestly.

And maybe you should have advised people that the issue was under review, instead of saying nothing about the inquiry at all.

I was referring to the occasion in November when you bawled to Plazma, demanding my head, lying in order to construe the offense. And, even more hilariously, lying about it when there was already detailed evidence on the record. I mean, you didn't even bother trying to answer the evidence. You just kept saying you didn't want to talk about it, and then kept talking about it, trying to lie to people who could easily see the evidence.

Of course I can.

However, when it comes to your dishonesty, I'm quite certain I'm not.

What slays me about that is that I have tried to discuss it before, on multiple occasions, and you never really seem to have a good answer.

As to sticking to present matters, I can see why you would want people to ignore your consistent history of fucking things up.

Given the stupid shit Gustav gets flagged for, I don't really give a fuck how many infraction points he has.

You're not credible.

December, 2009, after you fucked up the English language in a failed attempt to suspend her for three days.

You know, then you demanded she apologize for her opinion within twenty-four hours, and when she didn't, you suspended her for thirty days.

We fought about all the way into December.

Bells and I even fought about it. With each other.

Look, James, we're pretty much familiar with the tactic of trying to ignore something until you can say something stupid like, "It's ancient history".

And that majority of moderators who supported you? Where is that? I can't find it. Frankly, since you're unwilling to point anyone to it, I think it's another of your lies.

Like I said, how nice of you to ignore the examples I provided. Now you're asking for examples?

You mean like Bells? As I've already noted, that's likely coming.

Other people have.

Oh come now, James. Don't lie. There are plenty of people you go out of your way to fuck over. S.A.M. and Gustav come to mind.

You'll notice, however, that the people who annoy me don't get suspended for stupid shit. Hell, they rarely get suspended at all by my hand.

But, as you're apparently either too dishonest to admit to history, or else so fucking senile that you can't remember it, there really isn't any point, is there?

You make a fine politician, though.

• • •​

(1) We—all of us—are stained by his behavior.
(2) Quite clearly, James didn't want it discussed in the mod forum, as he didn't bother to log the suspension.
(3) Quite clearly, James didn't want it discussed in the mod forum, as he passed it over completely the first time.

Not much point in it. We've had years to make this place better. And it would seem we can't. Or don't want to. Or something like that.

I know this guy who happened to mention to me the other day that he'd lost hope, and didn't stop what he considered his hopeless labor because he felt, in some way, he couldn't. I don't disagree with the idea that he couldn't. It wasn't a literal statement demonstrating some sort of psychosis, or anything. It was a consideration of people and circumstances. I am certainly amid a crisis of hope in terms of this community. I suppose I didn't send Quadraphonics largely because I find him annoying in the first place, and, to the other, I don't see the point. Anyone on staff is welcome to suspend him. It's not like I would stop that action. I'm hard-pressed to figure who would.

Besides, the last real possibility we have of rebuilding this community into something intelligent would probably be the mythical bloodletting, and Quadraphonics has done much to make certain he would be included in the first cut.

But unless we have some idea of what we're trying to do, there really isn't much point in that, either.

• • •​

No, he wasn't panicking. It seems lying is just what he does.

You'll notice he's "forgotten" about the long, brutal fight that erupted after he suspended S.A.M. for hurting his feelings.

Now, here's the thing: Okay, sure, we can believe him. But that was a pretty big moment in Sciforums' history. I don't think it speaks well of him that he would forget so much of history.

And, indeed, if his history is off-limits or irrelevant or whatever, why isn't yours?

 

I know for a fact that spurious didn't ask to come back.
In fact, he and the others there are wondering why you are doing this. They think you're just trying to piss of James and Tiassa.
They are laughing about the whole thing.
Do you want me to quote some of the posts there?

 

you fucking see that, sci?
that is one of the infractions that will get me permabanned
that is the shit the trolls, enmos and james, flaunts in my face and yours

 

That doesn't mean you couldn't have started a discussion in the modforum.

I share that general feeling about the forum. But I don't blame James. I blame the public infighting between the mods and a host of misfit members.
If this situation doesn't clear up soon I'm gone for good. I don't need this.