Atomic Theory of Subatomic Particles in Black Holes.

Abstracts


Force can only be possible if an equal or greater opposing force can be exerted to.

Attractive force/s are impossible therefore are null and void.

Perceived attractive forces such as North and South poles and or Positive and Negative charge/s are the result of differing velocities and or speed.

Gravity is the result of an exertion and not via attraction.

The whole universe consists of the same mass throughout it.

The universe consists of differing areas.

Differing areas are defined as fields.

Compressed areas are defined as mass via their high outward potential towards unity and or stored energy to do work.

Cold and or Dark Matter is mass that has gained a near unity state and hence are treated as fields with very little potential and or outward exertion towards unity.

If mass and or a field are allowed a state of complete rest and or zero potential it becomes No-Thing and the universes constants must change, hence the universe is a closed system.

Amassed is a collection of fields and or solids, which are near a given potential close to each other within given “amassed medium”

All given and or defined mass/Amassed has a maximum area it can occupy when it is near rest or near Unity.

All Mass including, near unity Mass exerts an outward force; else it is No-thing or theoretically zero.

When a defined given Mass occupies its maximum area, its potential to do work is near depleted hence it is considered as Near Unity.

When Mass is compressed its increase in potential “energy” towards unity is considered as an increasing outward force or as an increasing positive charge.

When force is exerted upon a proton compressing it, it increases its potential, the compressing force is considered as inward and or as Negative charge, so for theoretical purposes and or for extremely basic physics such as quantum mechanics and or Particle Physics this is treated as an Electron.

Where two opposing charges and or forces meet, the respective charge or force where they enmesh and or meet is neutralized and or again is considered as a neutron for theoretical purposes and or for extremely basic physics such as quantum mechanics and or Particle Physics.

All Electromotive forces must be converted to Newton-meters and the electron and neutrons are to be disbanded and only used for basic theoretical purposes.



Constructs

E=MC^2
Where E equals the potential towards unity.
Where M equals the mass and or Amassed.
Where C^2 is the maximum area a mass treated as a single field can occupy realistically.

Gravity
90~99% of the universe is amassed that is near unity and this amassed force exerts upon solid mass and or Amassed solids as Gravity.

If we treat the whole universe as above the only thing we need really do is to acknowledge gravity is not via attraction and the model of the Atom is overly complicated, so before one proceeds into the basics of how and why Gravitational and Electromotive forces have been reconfigured let me refer to the basis of my reasoning and necessary calculus so that one may also be enlightened by ones very own calculus.

Previously, one had worked with five functional equations, which dealt with 11 variables with respects to the gamma function, now to those that have and are still playing around with such calculus, may have instantly recognized what one has referred to, and had one mentioned 5 representations and or flavours leading to M Theory; which involves those
11 dimensions, Most String Theorists would now be hooked with keen interest with out considering why one has termed Variables over Dimensions.

Read one’s previous statement again noting the switches made as obviously the way one has expressed it was for a very good reason as one may find it difficult to comprehend such a concept possible, Err~ Let’s hope one has clarified some concerns without confusing anyone by ones constructs thus far.

Before proceeding any further we need to get the rest of the scientific community up to speed with what one may have been grappling with, and in doing so perhaps shed some electromagnetic waves Err~ Light on what is yet another problem to most if not correctly addressed as to how and why “c” the constant that refers to the maximum speed of electromagnetic propagation, commonly referred to as the speed of Light and note one has deliberately preceded with ones wording for good reason here as well, as there are individuals out there that are still dealing with Light in an extremely basic construct via massless photons with a high velocity to them.

And no! It’s not because of the current contradiction to some ever increasing expansion of our universe, although if one considers how “c” is derived, the obvious should be that our universe is not expanding at an ever-increasing rate, and in fact is NOT expanding at all! And this will be Err~ expanded on and clarified by further reading or perhaps via familiarity with theories entailing Basic Electromagnetic Transmissions.

FORWARD.

Let us draw two large circles and define to them a set quantum.
We also should state the circles drawn represent spheres that are the same "field" in dimension to each other.
Further more let us state these spheres are equal in quanta to our universe or should we choose to, to a given portion or percentage of the Universe. Noting the Universe may not be currently pertaining to a spherical shape let alone a flattened one, although messing around with these spherical dimensions based on Physical laws gives for some really interesting results in where a flattened sphere just may be the case!

Moving on let us state that the first quantum or sphere defines moment one. Imagine one has the power to encapsulate and freeze Area/time and being able to apply means of calculus to it by divvying or dividing it to areas and or fields.

Let us state that the second sphere and or quantum defines moment two. Noting if this sphere and or quanta is a partial component "field" or portion of the universe, Time reference or data is a little more involved and therefore the snapshot of Area/time may not be relative to our observation point of time “unrelative” pronounced “un-re-late-ive” that’s if the Time rates are different, to which this second sphere should then reflect what data was availed to a given time reference and hence should be defined accordingly and proportionally smaller noting those extra considerations and or calculus to the basic E=MC^2 , via taking also into careful consideration the rate of data availed to time at our observing locality which is also governed by the same rules with respects to time frames and or references.

So for simplicities sake, for now this exercise will conform to current constructs of time used in current calculus used in every day science, so it will remain the same quanta as the first moments data availed to time because we have remained relative to the sphere or to the whole Universes time reference or moments. Whew what a mouth full! And if not fully understood one may need re reading it!

So lets proceed to encapsulating and freezing Area/time dimension without considering Times accruing data and its rate of data being availed back to the universe.

Let us now proceed to portion or define each of the two snap shots of time references into some components “fields”, portions and or dimensions of whatever variables one wishes to work with, keeping in mind we are dealing with more than just two dimensions if we treat the Circles as Spheres and or as real time.

For those individuals that have dealt with String Theory and or the Gamma function one may wish to Portion Variables to ones spheres or Universe accordingly to proceed ones calculus using your favoured equation to both moments by giving some indication of change or momentum to the plotting points that define ones current string/s and or a peak to peak of an electromagnetic wave.

Having allowed String theorist the luxury of partial first glory, the rest of the scientific community may also define portions and or variables to each snapshot of our universe pertaining to changes of state from area to area, via the use of E=MC^2 and if we are to express changes, the portions "fields" from the first instance must then be different to the second moment of our universe. In doing so we must do two things and note that these changes suggest movement and or momentum or shifting of force with some unity to all momentum, and hence a set amount of time frames or references may need to be considered “more spheres or snap shots!” just in order to express this movement and or propagation of Light via calculus more accurately, It is my hope this brings some insight gained from ones earlier inference of time being variable via given velocity to given mass.

But what has all this to do with the THEORY OF EVERYTHING?
The new dimension or rigid quanta introduced via the aforementioned into String theory is part of the key. But not the whole key of what we are dealing with, it only gives rise to a finite and an unchanging dimension for our Universe.
That along with depicting the universe at the very least in two moments as to why and how everything works, importantly we now can do calculus that gives rise to momentum representing change which is about to lead us to question if we are truly adhering to a rigid rule that concerns Time? Re-read ones earlier statements with respect to relativity and how important this is when one reasons what the speed of Light and or better expressed as charge and or force transference infers.

So far we have implied the universe is finite and what’s more, influences beyond it cannot change it, besides there is nothing left or beyond as its zero and or No-Thing - Because everything has been assumed as part of the Universe, including time via electromagnetic propagation! Should we discover more to the universe all we need do is add yet more dimensions and or divisions to our current Model.

Hence we exist in a closed system and what’s more no matter how many variables and or dimensions we work with we can still precisely predict and apply calculus to it all, as long as we apply a rigid rule in that,

If time is to accrue Data in order the Universe may exist by some record, All dimensions or “variables” that we define on what truly does exist, all must avail a portion “%” “or small image of its changing states” to the time reference and this suggests, as the Time reference accrues this Data “or images” of changes, The time references “image” involved must also avail or communicate back to the universe an image, and it is this reason why a Klein Bottle plotting is used to express these changes to our universe in order to simplify all the dynamics!

Read the previous paragraph in bold a few times keeping in mind “E” and or a given fields potential is what stores time and or change, and this takes some getting use to, and if it is not fully understood when we are to work with the fringes of our universe we may never understand why unity and or zero is impossible, one also highly recommends one study Klein Bottle plotting if one really needs to understand the universes full dynamics and forces that pertains to "fields" that define mass and or force/s and even why gravity is really the result of mass that is almost undetectable.

Getting back to our circles or Spheres that represent our universe with the respective portions that we have defined via known physical laws, Has any one noticed the implications with respects to times portion and the various possible implications if we apply the rule that all variables or dimensions MUST avail information to time, including time itself must avail data of its accruing changes back to the universe? Some serious shrinking or compression is implied.

In the real world, time goes by and as changes occur, times quanta or data accrues and hence must increase times quanta or record taking up a greater and greater portion of the Universe, but this implies every portion or dimension must concede to times increasing quanta or portion “Amassed”, but if we are to truly deal with a finite quantum or quanta to the Universe as a closed system, this would be problematic if we don’t concede that time must portion itself back or avail its information or data back to the Universe so that equilibrium is maintained, so if we apply the same rigid Rule to Time but rather Time avails its data back to the universe we complete and now adhere in the end to the strict rule where energy is not gained nor lost but rather is exchanged via momentum from area to area and or fields leading to our perception of Mass, Force, Gravity, Charge, Time Ect.


Perhaps some insight may be gained if we are to concede that our local area is availing to time due to data being dependant on change and hence local rate of data availed to Time being of a differing ratio to where we may be observing, and to prove this we need to observe beyond our local area and the further away from our Black Hole as our given time reference the more dramatic the ratio should be, to where a result of an increasing rate of expansion seems to be occurring the further we observe from our area, when in fact our local area has availed much more data “increase in Potential” to the time reference "Black hole” and or in real terms our galaxies centre than what the observed area other than in our galaxy has, hence it is proportionally with less momentum and or velocity to our time reference because of its exertion as gravity, now let us apply some plots to our Klein Bottle model to better understand this involving reasoning before we make fools out of our selves, or we may simply envision to be situated as such in real time to such a momentum or velocity where it seems we are indeed being stuffed and compressed into a neck of a Klein Bottle or to some inward momentum of our galaxy, which interestingly so happens we do have a Black Hole conforming perfectly to ones plotting points of a Klein Bottle neck, Err~ to which you may have to resort to calculus anyway if curious of its functional form pertaining to a Black Holes dynamics as being our current time reference.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I keep forgeting to point out that "c" = The speed of propagation for the Electromagnetic wave and NOT "C^2", as C^2 infers to an Area.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.