At what point will we not need to advance scientifically? Is there an endgame?

Discussion in 'General Science & Technology' started by Jan Ardena, Jan 11, 2019.

  1. TheFrogger Banned Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,175
    Mo' money, mo' problems.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. sweetpea Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,329
    What gave the western world a leading edge in being able to help third world countries?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,668
    Snowballing growth.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. TheFrogger Banned Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,175
    Philosophy!
     
  8. geek Registered Member

    Messages:
    58
    At what point will we not need to advance scientifically? Is there an endgame?

    Ans:
    The point,when someone realizes to advance only Spiritually.
     
  9. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,864
    Never heard of the Markovians?
     
    sculptor likes this.
  10. iceaura Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    30,994
  11. Jan Ardena OM!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,968
    I don’t get the association.

    Is this a good thing?

    Jan.
     
  12. Jan Ardena OM!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,968
    For some reason, humans have always sought shelter, and warmth when it gets cold. It goes without saying that we need food and water.
    I guess these are our basic needs.

    Jan.
     
  13. Jan Ardena OM!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,968
    I think most of us here can remember a time when we didn’t have mobile phones, or personal computers. As much as I prefer technological advancement, than not. Life wasn’t any less brilliant or exciting. To be honest, I could repeat any of about 10 telephone numbers, instantaneously, whereas my memory is not as sharp today. I’m aware that ageing could be a factor, but I don’t think it is.

    But why go past the point where we can live out the rest of our days in comfort, have fulfilling lives where we don’t have to struggle?

    Do you think we are at a time and place where we could simultaneously solve poverty, have clean water, on a global level, and still have a good, western style life (I realise I’m beingsidealistic)

    What do you think is an acceptable life spa

    Based on that logic, we will not be content until we can live forever. Would

    So why are we still dissatisfied?
    Are we still chasing carrots?

    Thanks for not not going down the atheist/theist route. I appreciate it.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Jan.
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2019
  14. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,606
    That probably has more to do with you being younger then. I know a few older people whose only contact with the outside world is via computer. That improves their lives.
    Because we can always work to make OTHER people's lives less of a struggle, and work to lessen the damage we do to our environment, and work to expand our knowledge of ourselves and the universe. (Would be nice to cure cancer, for example, or find another civilization we can learn from.)
    Not if a "good western lifestyle" involves SUV's, motorboats, regular steak dinners and vacations to Italy.
    I don't know. If people could live to 100 with a good quality of life, that would be a good goal.
    That's likely.
    It's how we are programmed. A child who is born and is always satisfied eventually starves, and doesn't have any more kids.
     
  15. Jeeves Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,028
    The reply was to:
    White supremacist BS.

    [trial, error and the pursuit of craziness]

    Surely, you must be able to make up your own mind about that.
     
  16. gmilam Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,370
    At what point will we not need to advance scientifically?

    When we have a beer that is both low in calories and tastes good.
     
    TheFrogger and sideshowbob like this.
  17. Beaconator Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,255
    Yes. But spiritually begates physically and that ends in "end game" beliefs.
     
  18. wegs Matter and Pixie Dust Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,206
    Science is merely the catalyst or process of uncovering the truths of the universe. Or half truths. Science doesn't "advance" as much as it reaches conclusions, and discovers what has always been there the whole time, in my opinion. I haven't read through this thread (so, maybe you've answered this), but why would you want science to stop making discoveries?

    I know that you're spiritual/religious, but science isn't our enemy.
     
    Last edited: May 1, 2019
  19. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,668
    Not conclusions; working models.
    The models will be improved over time. Or rejected for a better model.
     
  20. Marathon-man Registered Member

    Messages:
    33
    Maybe when we can evolve at will or change at a molecular level to fit any environment or circumstances. That would eliminate most inventions.
     
  21. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,668
    That may put an end to physical inventions but it surely won't put an end to our curious nature.
     
  22. Marathon-man Registered Member

    Messages:
    33
    It won't, but the question was scientific advancement, not curiosity. If we can change at will to swim underwater or take flight. if we can change our molecular structure to live in a volcano or on a planet with a hostile atmosphere scientific advancement is merely a thought away.
     
  23. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,668
    Yes, scientific advancement, not technological advancement.

    In other words, we won't stop learning how the world works.
     

Share This Page