# Are computers developing an independent memory?

#### Write4U

Valued Senior Member
A new quasiparticle lurks in semiconductors

Think of the implications......

The collexon is similar to a quasiparticle known as an exciton, a pairing of an electron and a hole (SN: 5/17/14, p. 5). While these pairs go it alone in excitons, electron-hole duos in collexons join forces with the surrounding sea of electrons, Christian Nenstiel, a physicist at the Technical University of Berlin, and colleagues report.
https://www.sciencenews.org/article...8&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Editors_Picks

What does " new quasiparticle " even mean ?

What does " new quasiparticle " even mean ?
A quasiparticle is something that emerges(typically in a medium) that behaves like a particle, but from a fundamental point of view isn't a particle. In this case, it's an electron and a hole stuck together. A hole (absence of an electron in a medium) cannot be part of a composite particle, but it behaves as if it is. For more, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasiparticle

Has a computer stated "I think therefore I am"?

For specific memory modules, the line drawn between a graph is usually the latter point of all points in the graph as considered- there would be more like tanx + a segment to form a line eventually enough motion a million Newtons of force. All points in a hyperbola would be more considered for a graph then font or text- a memory would then fit into a hyperbola out of shape of a force or tangent that programmed or constructed but not just built into a segment of code or arrays. Tanx then predicts a normal that will stop at a particular RAM. Summation is then all of the memory for whatever can hold the volatility and v = volatility then makes reduction in an OS as normal as possible especially with force like an injection of software. Viability to this claim would then make v1 = Volatility over a certain distance - OS as normal as possible - and possibility with force as tangent as possible. Memory is then more tangible for chips then discs and then makes input more like an OS then a memory set or module like a normal force over a shorter distance.

i would ponder that as we achieve the ability to allow semi conductors to operate at atmoic levels they will start to exibit potential behaviours that may be functional expresions of unknown states.
Do you emagine these "unknown states" as bein random.???

For specific memory modules, the line drawn between a graph is usually the latter point of all points in the graph as considered- there would be more like tanx + a segment to form a line eventually enough motion a million Newtons of force. All points in a hyperbola would be more considered for a graph then font or text- a memory would then fit into a hyperbola out of shape of a force or tangent that programmed or constructed but not just built into a segment of code or arrays. Tanx then predicts a normal that will stop at a particular RAM. Summation is then all of the memory for whatever can hold the volatility and v = volatility then makes reduction in an OS as normal as possible especially with force like an injection of software. Viability to this claim would then make v1 = Volatility over a certain distance - OS as normal as possible - and possibility with force as tangent as possible. Memory is then more tangible for chips then discs and then makes input more like an OS then a memory set or module like a normal force over a shorter distance.
Not sure if this word salad came from a person or a random post generator.

Not sure if this word salad came from a person or a random post generator.

Trump????

Alexandria Occasionally-Cogent?

Not sure if this word salad came from a person or a random post generator.
Forcebot has posted several of these in various threads.