Mr G, Let us take the easy one first. Tony1 is a prodigous poster in the religion forums. He, unlike you, ignores the total post and answers by pulling some of the context out of the post. At times he is obstinant, unreasonable in debating, and ah, shall we say hard headed. He has, for lack of a better word, a tendancy to draw fire like a lighting rod. At lot of it he brings on his self by his attitude. This attitude and as much as what he says brings a lot of distain from his peers. To say the least he is disruptive, tearing the threads and their topics into chaos continually. Everyone seems to be running around in circles because of the constant disruption. It has resulted in a large part of the members considering action to prevent such off the wall responces. As to the "opprobrious innuendo". I have noticed that, shall we say, you seem to frequent some posters more than others. I have never said that you have uttered a ...rather I have observed that you visit those threads and continually and effectively kill the thread. This is what I refer to as stalking. As such I have nothing to apolozie for as it is not my behaviour but yours, sir. I may not agree with the subject that has been posted or it's views, but I think that I am big enough to allow for that difference and if others are interested in such then let them have their party. I notice that I rarely see you in pseudoscience and downing the idea of LGM have landed. As for name calling, rudeness, and the like you will notice that it was also aimed at the opposite side of the fence from you, too. I think that perhaps you have read into that statement some of what was not aimed at you, for you have been responded to. Notice the bold highlight as to what was your part in my veiw. By that I mean that it is the attitude. It basically come down to scorn for what you do not agree with. Have you actually said this? No. As I said before, it is the attitude.