"Anti-einsteinist"? I'm better einsteinist, then you. Wish you bet?

Discussion in 'Physics & Math' started by Emil Smejkal, Jun 12, 2003.

  1. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    30,353
    Emil,

    I don't understand. Can you show me the mathematics which supports what you say? Or perhaps give me an explanation of how you would construct a light mill which spins in the opposite direction than what we would normally expect.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Emil Smejkal Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    50
    James R,
    If you writes "Can you show me the mathematics which supports what you say? Or perhaps give me an explanation of how you would construct a light mill which spins in the opposite direction than what we would normally expect.",
    I am afraid, it's no possible write it in open text. Shall I to write it in MS WOrd? Or Excel?
    The second: light mill which spins in the opposite direction. What is enough to describe? To write two sentency? Or picture, also? What shall I do as the first, and what as the second? If I am not able, be ready during one second, it is my defect?
    Email
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Emil Smejkal Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    50
    James R,
    I add attachment with MS Word. Zipped. There are equals and values for our mill.
    About design:
    Thin bulb-lamp, with diameter about 7-8 mm only, and nominal value cca 50W (real power cca 20 W). Used in car, for example.
    Four cubes from glass, in the circle, PI/2 each. Fixing similar, as each light-mill is fixed. Weight have to be similar little.
    Emil
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. HallsofIvy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    307
    I don't like to criticize other people's English since the way I speak the few languages I claim is not particularly good. However, you seem here to misunderstand the words "experiment" and "construct". You said you could devise a "reverse light mill" that would experimentally prove your point. When you were challenged to do so, or at least to accurately describe how to construct the mechanism, you post a "Word" document that was supposed to be that description. When I down loaded and read it I found that there are a few formulas and then a declaration that this will work the way you say.

    There is, in fact, no mention of "constructing" a mechanism. You have done nothing but repeat the claims that were challenged before.
     

Share This Page