Another Nobel for the simple minded

Discussion in 'Chemistry' started by Bishadi, Oct 9, 2008.

  1. Bishadi Banned Banned

    the comment was an old item i remembered, so i mentioned it

    Was not openly released. I was 16 yrs old and sent the material at my professors request.

    still is beyond the current and since have learned autonomy has value

    Upon receiving the responses i quit all institutional pursuits; the last thing i worked on in an institution was a gyro positioning device; so ships and airplanes wouldn't get lost. From there forth i have studied most of my life finding that what i stumbled onto is what will combine the sciences.

    Preferance is simply sharing what i wish, when i wish, and how i wish to.

    No one will ever own it and i travel all over the country putting material into the younger folks hands causing all kinds of ruckas now being seen all over the globe.

    rather enjoy being a prick to the arrogant idiots who think they know everything.

    what science is for is so that people can understand the phenomenon each experience in life.

    And the most important item is for the continuance of life; not the comforts

    To understand life; what life is, and how it works.... is all that i care about.
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2008
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  3. AlphaNumeric Fully ionized Registered Senior Member

    I know you're jealous

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    So lets talk about Yang Mills theory then. Would you care to show how gluons don't receive renormalisation corrections to their mass?
    No, that isn't what they did. That's what Glashow, Weinberg and Salam did. Yang and Mills did something different. See what i mean, you really do not comprehend what you speak.

    And I do comprehend what I speak, I have proven it to professors. Where's the evidence you comprehend it, all you do it make mistakes. :roflmao:
    Then there's absolutely no evidence you are right. It cannot be found online, despite you claiming it could be, and you don't remember where you read it.

    So unless you can prove otherwise, it would seem you lied.
    So you wrote something and you claim it's a paper. When I was 16 I wrote a lengthy essay on black holes and gave it to a teacher. Doesn't mean I go around claiming I wrote a paper on black holes.

    Yet again, you lied.
    You're the one who thinks he knows everything. You wrote BS when you were 16 and claim it was a revolutionary paper. You claim learning at Cambridge is worthless. You claim you go around "the country putting material into the younger folks hands causing all kinds of ruckas now being seen all over the globe.", yet there's no evidence of that. You are an unpublished, ignorant hack. You claim we'll all know better in a few months. I bet you $500 that in a year from now you'll still be a no name ignorant hack in the world of physics. Wanna put your money where your mouth is?
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  5. Vkothii Banned Banned

    Get the fuck outta here, the guy's a genius.
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  7. Saxion Banned Banned

    One question, why did you talk about the mass of a gluon... i was under the impression gluons are massless particles... the excess energy of quarks...
  8. rpenner Fully Wired Valued Senior Member

    To understand the question, you need to know some quantum field theory and a sub-topic within that field called renormalization.

    In renormalization, a series of quantum field terms in a perturbation expansion result in a electron not having the mass that the naive theory predicts, and not having the charge or magnetic moment the naive theory predicts, but all of this works out so it does have a definite mass, charge and magnetic moment so we can insert these values into the naive theory. (10% garbled?)

    The gluon, unlike the photon has a charge of the type it mediates -- it couples to itself -- so all things being equal, you would expect that even if you start with massless gluons in a naive theory, that the renormalization process will give it non-zero mass.

    Sun's been up for a while -- time to go to bed.
  9. Bishadi Banned Banned

    and under your name...... 'you are wrong'....

    you share the weak disposition of the Lambriage HpD.... you are so proud of yourself it is sad to think you were once a human being


    Gluons don't exists unless created. Not a gluon in the medical field! Well perhaps that glu came to you in between classes but that's about it.

    ie.. every and that means EVERY particle less than an H atom is an isolated portion of another atom caused by em. That is something you will have to come to terms with son. Them particles spinning around in accelerators do ZERO for mankind.

    Just like you!

    What an EEG on a bowl of jello, is like and EEG of 'your' brain?

    if you say so ..... mr lambridge

    because the initial work was written to share the speed of light was incorrect and my professor said if the math does nothing for mankind it is useless. That is when the pursuit of the synaptic junctions was addressed. The mistake i made was combining a biological frame at the atomic level in math.

    The only reason i know that it was actually observed was that the response was that a (per se) photon cannot be slowed and so unless someone actually went through the material none would have known that was requisite.

    As for black holes, dark matter, dark energy........... they are like your gluon; creations from the ignorance of the current models of science

    and the the School of Lambridge is still creating the same idiots as we have you providing the evidence!

    What a waste of a thread; having to slap around an arrogant kid who acts like he owns the world and knows everything.

    Most guys like you would just walk away from nuts like me and go sip a latte while wrapping their degree around their winkie for self abuse.

    Go fly a kite kid......

    find something to do with your life as apparently the only thing important for you is to try and use your education to make yourself feel good

    Last edited: Oct 15, 2008
  10. Hercules Rockefeller Beatings will continue until morale improves. Moderator


    ....he says as he peddles his crackpot theories on an internet science forum.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    The irony is too much. My sides can't take much more of this.
  11. camilus the villain with x-ray glasses Registered Senior Member

    wow, just another idiot is more like it. Please stop or Alpha will eat you soul.
  12. CheskiChips Banned Banned

    Why? I think Bishadi brought up a lot of great points.
  13. camilus the villain with x-ray glasses Registered Senior Member

    like? please, a rat can bring up better points. this fool compared the photo-electric effect to feeling heat from the sun, WTF? lmao
  14. CheskiChips Banned Banned

    He was funny and pointed out various inadequacies of the modern scientific community.
  15. camilus the villain with x-ray glasses Registered Senior Member

    I dont know about all that, although I will credit him with making Einstein roll over in his grave. Old Albert would have a field day laughing at this joker over that.
  16. Bishadi Banned Banned

    Peace to the friends across the lake but i rather enjoy seeing where i make mistakes in rendition. In a sense the guy is correct but he missed the baiting as i enjoy playing with PhD's and professors.

    i.e.. photoelectric effect was another tesla accomplishment; einstein just got paid for it.

    How many know that one?

    Alpha and Omega; beginning and ending. (all mass, all energy, all time; the total of existence itself (combined trinity of ?)

    The math to comprehend that is the Name of ?

    Me already have bliss and why not for sale..... simply keeping a promise!

    Them of the old-old school may know what that means.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    and me no genius, just honest beyond what many even comprehend.

    Meaning: i have no use for interpretations, i do the work myself! We have the internet so there are no borders and i can be into data, experiments and theorem from most every university on this planet.

    To be honest and see proper; every phenomenon can be described. Nothing magical except making a choice and doing it.

    Someone had to make the life long commitment; you just so happen to have bumped into the idiot. (someone who actually cares)

    these forums are for planting seeds and looking for something perhaps i had not seen..... no single soul on earth can know everything, an i am honest enough to know that. :shrug:

    guess if i was a lambridge graduate with sh;t paper on the wall i would be stupid too but instead made a choice

    and not for me but for tomorrow's children, our future!

    no one will 'own' the truth and no one can stop me.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

  17. camilus the villain with x-ray glasses Registered Senior Member

    Actually, Tesla just described the photoelectric effect, but Einstein developed it mathematically. Einstein's theory was based on Planck's work on black-body radiation, and light quanta (packets of light).

    Einstein did get paid for it, although it wasnt enough since he never got 'paid' for relativity.

    This is what I'm talking about. Whata fuck are you talking about? and I dont consider a Cambridge degree a "shit paper on the wall," it is a rather noted accomplishment.

    Listen, this thread derailed way beyond its tracks, and if the original topic was simple-minded Nobel prize winners, you just have to look at who chooses the receipients. Einstein won the Nobel Prize for his work on the light quanta and photoelectric effect, not for his masterpiece, relativity.
  18. Bishadi Banned Banned

    you mean performed. Real data!

    And planck's adherance to the 2nd law is what failed him

    Such that with planck's usage of angular momentum created a wall in addressing associating systems. (look up gibbs free energy or green's function)

    If the math was correct, a kid could understand it.

    remember to old days when the earth was flat; well Ptolemy had math to share exactly why the roaming bodies (planets) criss-crossed the sky.

    Just imagine how whacked someone would have to be to make sense of that

    Well that is what has occurred in today's sciences. ie... folk actually believe a state of energy is both a particle and a wave. (it's magic dude)

    because of the complacent (the peanut gallery) as too busy arguing and telling us about their credentials rather than perhaps acting like scientists.

    Love the Big E, but the photoelectric effect was not his and if you read any of his work you would realize he regretted ever publishing the 'unfinished' work. (both relativity frames are wrong)

    Prepare for a complete paradigm shift and it is based on comprehending light as the energy upon mass, quite similar to planck, noting 'f' but not without 'l' ........... or the entanglement with the environment
  19. Hercules Rockefeller Beatings will continue until morale improves. Moderator

    Not surprisingly, his answer appears to be no judging from his avoidance.

    Oh yes, we're holding our collective breath for your complete paradigm shift.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

  20. AlphaNumeric Fully ionized Registered Senior Member

    That would make him about the 7th or 8th crank who claimed that they'd over turn mainstream physics or maths 'soon' to run away from that bet.If they are so sure, isn't it free money to them? :shrug:

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

  21. Bishadi Banned Banned


    Now can you see what lambridge did to you?

    Your priorities and requirement of absolute integrity to the field of science has been ruined.

    Haven't you had your character stepped on enough to find somewhere else to play?

    As for the Rockefeller idiot.... your name says it all; a worthless self-centered waste of resources (oxygen).

    Both of you are so bent on what you can gain, rather than what you can contribute, that moving forward on this site with either of you in tow is pointless.


    But for them who are inquisitive just focus your sites on the associations of atoms and energy in which energy is em (light), and mass is em affixed in time.

    All particles less than H; are isolations from a unit. Think of a human body; the unit when born is the whole, arms and legs are simply portions of.

    Observe the energy between them structures as the specimen rather than the mass. This is easy to observe as a dead person is all the same mass but "what" is missing? The light!

    Stay focused on light as the energy between structures and that 'non-local' affect between mass is the property of energy (light) known as entanglement.

    i'll be around doing what i do best; learning and sharing for the next generation to have the chance none before ever had; Understanding!

    me at my best incognito at this time
  22. AlphaNumeric Fully ionized Registered Senior Member

    But if you're right and can so easily show it, I don't gain anything, you gain something. I'm giving you an incentive to try to get your work out to the world. If you're right, I'm basically paying you to provide the world with your knowledge. That isn't me being greedy, it's a demonstration I'm willing to use my money to help the rest of the world.

    Of course if you're wrong, then you'll have to pay me. But you're so confident you're right, that shouldn't be a problem..... right?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

  23. Bishadi Banned Banned

    What incentive?

    How are you doing that?

    ie.... do you have a bank account # that we can tap into and use 100% of the funds for publishing without anyone being able to corrupt and claim to own the material that is presented?

    i will put up; if there are enough to make sure the knowledge will reach all four corners before anyone imposes a bias or government sensoring

    ie... math of such would enable toys far worse than a fussion bomb

    for example, the reason (i believe) we are not burning H in our ICE engines is because the knowledge of electrolysis is so simple anyone could be isolating H in there garage from water and the concussion bombs from raw H would make a few in the security arm quite nervous.

Share This Page