So you consider the statement of a farmer in a newspaper from the 1880s as a fact? All the photographs you dug up have been shown to be fakes, but you believe a 150 year old tabloid story?
What evidence? The photos are faked, and the news articles are mostly from the 1800s. Your "expert" from the Youtube video is a stonemason with no knowledge of geology or American history. So, again, what evidence do you have?
The best evidence and a through explaination and understanding is through Richard J. Dewhurst's book , The Ancient Giants who ruled America , 2014 Richard J. Dewhurst is an Emmy Award-winning writer of the HBO documentary Dear America : Letters Home from Vietnam. A graduate of NYU with degrees in journalism , film and Television , he has written and edited for the History Channel , the Arts & Entertainment Channel , PBS , Fox Television and Fox Films , ABC News , TNT , Paramount Pictures , and the Miami Herald
No, Richard's book is a book. It no doubt makes reference to alleged evidence, but the book itself is not evidence.
Let me get this straight... I have opinions, and somehow they get published... Now, they're facts? Yeah...OK.
Ten skeletons "of both sexes and of gigantic size" were taken from a mound at Warren, Minnesota, 1883. (St. Paul Pioneer Press, May 23, 1883) A skeleton 7 feet 6 inches long was found in a massive stone structure that was likened to a temple chamber within a mound in Kanawha County, West Virginia, in 1884. (American Antiquarian, v6, 1884 133f. Cyrus Thomas, Report on Mound Explorations of the Bureau of Ethnology, 12th Annual Report, Smithsonian Bureau of Ethnology, 1890-91).
Oh, we're back to the reports from the 1800s. Where are these skeletons? How big is "gigantic?" If 7'6" constitutes a "giant," then would you contend that Yao Ming is not human? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yao_Ming
No he is not. You're calling skeletons of people 7 foot 6 inches tall "giants." As in, non-human. Yao Ming is 7 foot 6 inches tall. Is he also non-human? Be a bit more specific, river.