NO laws of physics can be broken. It's that simple. How do you provide an example of something that doesn't exist?
Presumably English isn't your first language. Antigravity doesn't exist (i.e. there are no examples of it in evidence and there is no technology extant that will allow it), but research is taking place to see if it's at all possible.
You mean your "game" of dishonesty, ignorance, failing to provide support for your arguments and generally not doing anything but make vague statements? I agree.
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/ufo-flying.152787/page-7#post-3349428 (dywyddyr) so when you clearly made this comment in the quote, were you referring to t.t.brown's work or anti-gravity research in general?
You've asked this before, and the answer is still the same: of course it would matter. Because you can't support any one of your claims?
Whenever you decide to poke your head into this forum, the games obviously begin. Unsupported nonsensical claims, vague half hearted attempts at philosophical banter, denying obvious facts, culminating in the predictable anti science rants. The only good thing that comes from the collective nonsensical stuff infesting this forum at this time, is that in reality, academia, science and mainstream scientists are oblivious to the tripe that is discussed.
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! The evidence in these threads points to you being the one that is naive and incredibly gullible to boot. I'm not the one that canvasses woo sights for fabricated accounts of UFO's of Alien origin: I'm not the one that claims ghosts and goblins and fairies are real: I'm not the one that believes in giants: I'm not the one that accepts the supernatural over legitimate scientific explanations. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!