An atomistic theory of matter

The Atomistic Theory of Matter is a scientific revolution with paradgm shift and sweeps the scientific revolution at the begining of the 20. century away.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Thanks for the links. I was having a little trouble locating them last night.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

You can't sweep the physics revolutions of the 20th century away -- you have to explain them in terms of new models. That's the principle of correspondence.

If old model X was accepted, it was accepted because it correctly described the behavior of phenomena. If new model Y is to be accepted in the future as a a replacement for X, then at a minimum it must correctly described the behavior of all the phenomena that model X describes, which is to say, in a suitable limit model Y must directly approximate model X.

So it is with Special Relativity, because in the limit \(v\to 0\), the expression \(m_0 c^2 \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}} - 1 \right) \) reduces to \(\frac{1}{2} mv^2\). Likewise \(\frac{m_0 v}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}} \) reduces to \(m_0 v\) etc.
So it is with General Relativity, because in the limits \(v\to 0, M\to 0, m\to 0\), the distance between to bodies initially at rest is governed by \(\frac{d^2 r}{d t^2} = - \frac{G (M + m)}{r^2}\) exactly as in Newtonian gravity.
So it is with Quantum Field Theory, because in the limit of “the time evolved quantum observables averaged over ℏ-dependent coherent states converge in the limit ℏ→0 to the corresponding classical quantities, evolved by the classical dynamics”.

G, 1/c and ℏ are quantities that very small in conventional human limits, but their influence in physical phenomena is fundamental. To ignore them is to ignore the behavior of reality, which is the only lesson we can learn from reality.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

It sucks that they're allowed to spam their own cranksites with impunity, too.

 

The delusion is strong with this one.

 

That's just the way the road winds around here. What's open for discussion is pretty .......... Open.

 

In your dreams maybe.

 

05.09.2015

At the beginning of the 20th century experimental observations, at first in microscopical range later on in the astrophysics, forced the physical community to change the foundations of classical physics. Double theories have become apparent. The special theory of relativity (SRT) and the quantum theory (QT) conglomerated to the Standard Model of particle physics (SMPP) and the general theory of relativity (GRT) forms the Standard Model of astrophysics (SMAP). Each of them is breaking with some principle of classical physics but not in a uniform and consequent way. Before those, that the classical physics was completed with the Maxwell theory of electromagnetism. The Maxwell equations for the time dependent movement of the electromagnetic field with a constant propagation c brought problems of integration in the classical physics. The electromagnetic field is a non-conservative continuous field and in its equation of motion only the charge and stream probability density appear for the motion of particles. For the description of electromagnetism the Minkowski space was created which connect space and time because of the constant propagation of the field. The SRT tries to handle this problem for the particles with the known results of velocity dependent (inertial) masses, and with the relativity of motion in comparison with c. The absolute role of time and space were given up. The relative movement of bodies to the constant c and to coordinate systems with constant velocities was accomplished with the weak equivalence principle (the equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass) and with the equivalence of mass and energy E = mc2. A prerequisite of the SRT is that the position and velocity of bodies as well as the time can be determined exactly, or with other words, the SRT is a deterministic theory. But the Maxwell theory is principally not a deterministic theory. There is a discrepancy between SRT and the theory of electromagnetism, see [link removed]. The criticism against SRT was in earlier time very loud and also nowadays is not ebbed away. However, the academic community takes no notice of them.

The second requisite of the SMPP is the quantum theory (QT). According to the QT, the Planck’s constant h quantizes the particles energies and the fields. The energy conservation is a prerequisite; however, the electromagnetic field is a non-conservative field. Furthermore, the precise knowledge of particle position and velosity (impulse) is given up; their uncertainty is regulated with Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle connected with h. Although the QT and the SRT are quite different theoretical and logical constructions, they were bound together to the SMPP.

The GRT’s shortcoming is simply to explain; the underlying principle of the Universality of Free Fall (UFF) was not controlled seriously with fall experiments since Galileo formulated this as a hypothesis. Also the GRT uses the prerequisite that the acceleration of bodies can be determinate exactly. Furthermore, the gravity cannot be distinguished from a coordinate system which moves with constant acceleration. The consequence is the SMAP which is believed by the physical community as a true fact. The gravity is a deformation of the space-time and has another metric as the metric of electromagnetism. This is a serious contradiction in the description of Nature.

At the end, I will give some remarks about the role of publication in scientific journals with the aid to bring discussion in the scientific community. The peer review system prevents publications which are not conforming to “emphasized scientific standards”. It was thought to bring quality control in the publications, but it plays a role as censure. Therefore for instance a monoculture of science is established, the energetic physics. A pluralistic discussion of theories, of the energetic AND atomistic theories, is in the physical literature not allowed. The atomistic theory of matter is considered as non-conform to the “emphasized scientific standards”. Furthermore, it is established that “the theory says what have to be measured”; no matter if the accepted theory is correct, or not. For instance the violations of UFF are not allowed to measure and the deviated results are not allowed to publish.

The development of the Atomistic Theory of Matter on the basics of stable elementary particles in [link removed] is a self-consistent and complete theory with the unification of the electromagnetism and gravity and uses valid mathematical theories for its prognoses. For instance, the Planck’s constant is identified as Lagrange multiplier which appears only in the equation of motion of particles. Despite of them the reviewers reject the publication and the physical community cannot discuss it in connection to the energetic SMPP and SMAP. Also scientific forums contribute unconsciouslyto the censure, than they also throw way threads in which hot discussions take place about established physics and the new physics.

The pillars of modern physics stand in stalemate and the physical community does not take notice. The Fundmental Principles of Physics at the beginning of this thead is the first time that such generally formulated principles of physics appear. See also the complet disussion and the matematical formultation of the new theory in [link removed]

 

Will you stop spamming links to your website?

 

In this thread the physical evidence of gravitational charges are in focus. But general aspects of physics as science have also to be discussed:

At the beginning of the 20th century experimental observations, at first in microscopical range later on in the astrophysics, forced the physical community to change the foundations of classical physics. Double theories have become apparent. The special theory of relativity (SRT) and the quantum theory (QT) conglomerated to the Standard Model of particle physics (SMPP) and the general theory of relativity (GRT) forms the Standard Model of astrophysics (SMAP). Each of them is breaking with some principle of classical physics but not in a uniform and consequent way. Before those, that the classical physics was completed with the Maxwell theory of electromagnetism. The Maxwell equations for the time dependent movement of the electromagnetic field with a constant propagation c brought problems of integration in the classical physics. The electromagnetic field is a non-conservative continuous field and in its equation of motion only the charge and stream probability density appear for the motion of particles. For the description of electromagnetism the Minkowski space was created which connect space and time because of the constant propagation of the field. The SRT tries to handle this problem for the particles with the known results of velocity dependent (inertial) masses, and with the relativity of motion in comparison with c. The absolute role of time and space were given up. The relative movement of bodies to the constant c and to coordinate systems with constant velocities was accomplished with the weak equivalence principle (the equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass) and with the equivalence of mass and energy E = mc2. A prerequisite of the SRT is that the position and velocity of bodies as well as the time can be determined exactly, or with other words, the SRT is a deterministic theory. But the Maxwell theory is principally not a deterministic theory. There is a discrepancy between SRT and the theory of electromagnetism, see [link removed]. The criticism against SRT was in earlier time very loud and also nowadays is not ebbed away. However, the academic community takes no notice of them.

The second requisite of the SMPP is the quantum theory (QT). According to the QT, the Planck’s constant h quantizes the particles energies and the fields. The energy conservation is a prerequisite; however, the electromagnetic field is a non-conservative field. Furthermore, the precise knowledge of particle position and velosity (impulse) is given up; their uncertainty is regulated with Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle connected with h. Although the QT and the SRT are quite different theoretical and logical constructions, they were bound together to the SMPP.

The GRT’s shortcoming is simply to explain; the underlying principle of the Universality of Free Fall (UFF) was not controlled seriously with fall experiments since Galileo formulated this as a hypothesis. Also the GRT uses the prerequisite that the acceleration of bodies can be determinate exactly. Furthermore, the gravity cannot be distinguished from a coordinate system which moves with constant acceleration. The consequence is the SMAP which is believed by the physical community as a true fact. The gravity is a deformation of the space-time and has another metric as the metric of electromagnetism. This is a serious contradiction in the description of Nature.

At the end, I will give some remarks about the role of publication in scientific journals with the aid to bring discussion in the scientific community. The peer review system prevents publications which are not conforming to “emphasized scientific standards”. It was thought to bring quality control in the publications, but it plays a role as censure. Therefore for instance a monoculture of science is established, the energetic physics. A pluralistic discussion of theories, of the energetic AND atomistic theories, is in the physical literature not allowed. The atomistic theory of matter is considered as non-conform to the “emphasized scientific standards”. Furthermore, it is established that “the theory says what have to be measured”; no matter if the accepted theory is correct, or not. For instance the violations of UFF are not allowed to measure and the deviated results are not allowed to publish.

The development of the Atomistic Theory of Matter on the basics of stable elementary particles in [link removed] is a self-consistent and complete theory with the unification of the electromagnetism and gravity and uses valid mathematical theories for its prognoses. For instance, the Planck’s constant is identified as Lagrange multiplier which appears only in the equation of motion of particles. Despite of them the reviewers reject the publication and the physical community cannot discuss it in connection to the energetic SMPP and SMAP. Also scientific forums contribute unconsciously to the censure, than they also throw way threads in which hot discussions take place about established physics and the new physics.

The pillars of modern physics stand in stalemate and the physical community does not take notice. The Fundamental Principles of Physics appear, as generally formulated principles of physics, in the Atomistic Theory of Matter at the first time. See also the complet disussion and the mathematical formultation of the new theory in [link removed]

 

In an other thread Rpenner stated "... you have to explain them in terms of new models. That's the principle of correspondence."

The [link removed] explains the new model.

 

You do not have a model.You have no more than a hypothetical.
The standard particle model stands as is despite your evangelistic like attacks on it.

 

Only in the eyes of those with an agenda to push such as yourself, and other anti mainstream nuts.
If you had anything of substance you would not be here, conducting your evangelistic style of preaching.

 

Well fuck me dead and hang my arse out to dry! You mean peer review has been all this time, trying to uphold scientific standards???
You mean they have been contributing in keeping nonsensical claims that quarks do not exist out of reputable papers??

TIC MODE ON

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Apparently you can not understand the written sentences: the peer review allows the publication in accordance to "emphasized scientific standards" but these standards do not belonge to physically valid theories.

 

Which standard model do you mean?

 

The standard model

 

Are you dappoboy?

 

You asked a question, the question was answered - rejoice.

 

Does your model include neutrinos?