An Agnostic Query

Funny!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

and you wonder why I repeatedly use the analogy of a high school drop out laughing at a physicist?
:shrug:

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

No. I know why you do it.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

really?
Then why do you continue to laugh at knowledge you are unfamiliar with?

 

Because you've shown nothing - zero - in all this time that indicates your "knowledge" is anything but a subjective delusion.

I really is funny. You're trying to argue an issue that, by your very own admission, is unapproachable by any but the most highly trained theistic minds and even then it only results in a subjective "direct perception".

To me, that's very funny.

 

from my side it is funny how atheists can talk about delusion, etc without offering a definition of reality
:shrug:

 

Reality: That which can me measured or directly inferred through a causal chain of events that follow known physical law. Done. Next?

 

so your mind or self doesn't exist?
similarly a mother crocodile gently massaging her eggs between her teeth that can snap a buffalo's bone does not have a place in reality since it cannot be explained by a known physical law?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

:wtf:

You throw out these fallacious analogies like they're going out of fashion.

WHAT KNOWN PHYSICAL LAW prevents a mother crocodile from doing what you describe? It is nothing more than the ability to control the muscles in the jaw. It ALL follows physical laws!

You are grasping at straws!!


And how does mind or self not follow the definition of reality given?
The fact that we don't know the precise chain is irrelevant, but we know that the brain operates within the laws of physics. We know this - we know there is a self - that there is a causal chain from one to other is thus inferred.

But again you'll claim "current inability = impossibility" as your prime argument - or some such drivel.

 

if you think I raised the issue as a simple query of jaw mechanics, I think you missed the point ....

you explain it yourself

so we don't know yet we know - interesting ....

more like

current inability = current inability

there are very good reasons why post dated cheques are not very meritorious in either science or commerce