You have to say "According to the Israel Defense Forces from September 2000 through 2003, 29 suicide attacks have been carried out by youth under the age of 18..." and then look for independent verification of their hasbara. Which you will never find And add important details like:
And given that there were 92 documented suicide bombings during that period, and that most suicide bombers are young, I don't find that number at all hard to believe. Nor would Israel have any particular reason to grossly overstate the fact. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Palestinian_suicide_attacks
and nothing in that statement precludes the usage of "auspices". support and approval of a forum where interested parties can air their grievances does not in anyway imply a necessary endorsement of everything that is presented. that may or may not come later in subsequent document
Ah, yes it does, "auspices" indicates SUPPORT, http://www.thefreedictionary.com/auspice But the report clearly states that they do not necessarily support any statements made by the submitters:
i am done pounding my head against your thick skull lets move on you seem to have a problem with addameer's submission articulate
Let's not. Nice attempt to weasle out of it Gustav, but indeed this post is also dishonest in that it implies that you were right and I was wrong. But it was you who started this by posting a submission to the UN as if it was from a report from the UN. Arthur
again. the references to the allegations are contained here..... United Nations Human Rights Council report (A/HRC/WG.6/3/ISR/3) Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! /amused at the obvious pathology
Agree, they are ALLEGATIONS. Of course that's NOT how you originally presented them. http://sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2843324&postcount=186 /amused at your continuing inability to take responsibility for your actions.
I believe its from Kanter's study in Gaza carried out before the last massacre in 2008 It was part of the UNCTAD presentation, if I am not mistaken http://hir.harvard.edu/india-in-transition/a-costly-diagnosis?page=0,1 And quoted by Falk in his recent attempts to curtail the psychological, physical and sexual abuse of Palestinian children in Israel which was quoted by Chris Hedges in his article here There was another independent report by Lord Dubs on conditions of Palestinian child prisoners in the West Bank here http://www.dci-palestine.org/docume...rns-palestinian-child-detainees-uk-parliament According to Kucinich, 50% of the population of Gaza is under 14 years of age http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-klRHEA4Lg
Well that would have been honest, even more so if you had indicated who it was that was making the allegetions. Or are you against basing a discussion on honesty?
i will not reword, kiddo if you want to dispute an "allegation", do so i will rebut with the primary sources provided in the report along with any others i can find on the internet. so are you now demanding that i actually type out a list of all the stakeholders in my post? a link containing such is inadequate? you are clearly insane if that is the case posturing? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Once again you miss the point, kiddo. Rewording it would show that it was a mistake and you are not intentionally trying to be dishonest. On the internet discussion board you have little of value besides your reputation for honesty. See http://sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2846840&postcount=86 if you don't understand the concept. Arthur
Geoff: A documentary on living conditions in Gaza with Richard Falk narrating the effects on children and conducting live interviews: http://current.com/1oh1p4c
crap i shall hold all the grievances aired by the stakeholders as provisionally true and factual until proven otherwise you can educate me when you get a clue
Big surprise. You think it's any shock to find that according to you all someone has to do is make an ALLEGATION against Israel for it to be considered "provisionally true and factual"? LOL, hardly.
Just another example of you being dishonest by taking my quote out of context: What I actually said: All you make clear is you aren't interested in an HONEST discussion. Again, no big surprise. Arthur
no i read the stakeholders submissions and sources and find them based on actual events if that is what helps you sleep at night......:shrug:
