All "PARTICLE" can be found in extended periodic tables INCLUDING(750GeV)

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by sunshaker, Dec 24, 2015.

  1. sunshaker Registered Member

    Messages:
    84
    http://alpha-omega-sunshaker.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/top-quark-condensate.html



    After extending periodic table to Z172, I realized you can have a symmetry between tables, joined tables give mass of top quark(the first layer of larger structure, russian dolls),
    These "Tables" make up the structure of protons, proton proton collisions give the first level which are Top Quarks, Z/W bosons/Higgs, the second levels we are just reaching "THE 750 GeV Bump"
    Which I PREDICTED last year through these tables,
    This bump may have a "width of 45/50 GeV(also predicted), Which can be explained within these fractal periodic tables.
    I am not saying this answers all questions, but it as allowed me to show a possible mass of all "particles" that have been found, also the 16% matter to 84% dark matter/supersymmetric particles.



    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Infinite Mass within the Proton,
    It is all down to Fractal scales,
    Below 3 possible, of the many new "particles/Quarks" for future higher energy Proton collisions at CERN, Depending on decay paths.
    1, 692 GeV to 750 GeV, 692 to 750 PROTONS WITHIN SYSTEM
    2, 2076 GeV to 2134 GeV, 2076 to 2134 PROTONS WITHIN SYSTEM
    3, 3460 GeV 3460X PROTON WITHIN SYSTEM

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,332
    Merry Christmas.
     
    origin likes this.
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,450
    I think that is only reasonable response to the OP. Have a happy new year to you both, too!
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. sunshaker Registered Member

    Messages:
    84
    I am trying to build a TOE model, I know most here will not understand the above, it is why I put it in "pseudoscience", but there are a few questions I would like to ask.
    I am trying to understand the "known structure of Protons",
    These are 3 versions from Matt Strassler
    http://profmattstrassler.com/articl...the-structure-of-matter/protons-and-neutrons/

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Fig. 1: An oversimplified vision of protons as made from two up quarks and a down quark, and neutrons as made from two down quarks and an up quark — and nothing else.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Fig. 2: This figure improves on Figure 1 by emphasizing the important role of the strong nuclear force in holding the quarks in the proton. Usually (and confusingly) the drawn springs are intended to schematically indicate that there are gluons in the proton.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Fig. 3: A more realistic, though still imperfect, image of protons and neutrons as full of quarks, anti-quarks and gluons, moving around at high speed. More precisely, a proton consists of two up quarks and a down quark plus many gluons (g) plus many quark/anti-quark pairs (u, d, s stand for up, down and strange quarks; anti-quarks are marked with a bar.) The edge of a proton or neutron is not sharp. Ignore the color-coding for now; it will become clearer in future articles.

    but I was wondering if "protons" could have shells/layers? or whether this has been completely ruled out?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  8. sunshaker Registered Member

    Messages:
    84
    A proton(1 GeV) has shells, The lower energy runs at cern broke through the first shell/layer(top quarks/higgs/WZ bosons)(ENERGIES TO 173 GEV). The second higher energy runs, broke through to second shell, this is where the new 750 GeV bump comes from(which I predicted last year), but this 750gev bump is not one particle, it is 3 particles WITH SIMILAR decay paths. At future higher energy runs, the 3rd shell will have particles at 2000+GeV.

    Here in first 2 diagrams, I am trying to show proton outer shell 750 GeV shell/layer,

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Here are all the "Fractal elements", that make up the "PROTON"

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Everything exists within the "PROTON".
    Quarks are but fractal combinations of these tables.
     
  9. sunshaker Registered Member

    Messages:
    84
    If the "Proton" does have shells/layers, as I have tried to show, I was thinking that each shell/layer may cause a "Casimir Effect" like we see between to plates, Which opens up the idea "to me" of zero-point energy within this system.

    Possible Casimir effect between shells/layers?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  10. sunshaker Registered Member

    Messages:
    84
    ARE WE THE CREATORS OF GRAVITY?

    "I have come to realize, "Every Proton", "Is a Fractal Multi-verse",

    Humans, Are made of matter, atoms, Which are combinations of Protons, neutrons, electrons, Quarks.
    Which would then also mean, Humans, Are made of Universes, Which also means, The food/matter, We consume for energy, are also groups of Multi-Verses, Universes are our energy source,
    We are "Multi-Universal Entities", Living in a "Fractal Universe",
    On these scales when we consume "food", we are consuming universes, We behave has massive black holes do.

    We "Create our own Gravity",

    When we build in the "Human World",

    We put combinations of atoms/elements together,

    We build houses, Houses are made of matter, "Protons", Which are universes, Quarks/Atoms/molecules= Fractal Multi-Verses,

    These Multi-Verses are now held together by a "GRAVITY WE CREATE" using bricks and mortar, Held within structures many call Home,

    This "Gravity", Then scales down to individual Universes, held within our Earthly Creations,
    I sit in my room, I am a vast Multi-Universal Entity,

    I am the GRAVITY, That holds countless Multi-verses together,

    Every Ornament/Possession in my home is a Massive Fractal Multi-Verse,

    We are far greater than most could ever realize, Most do not see beyond this tiny speck we call "The Universe",

    "I EAT MULTI-VERSES FOR BREAKFAST",

    This "View" OF "Reality, Has given me a new found appreciation of the wonders around me, I look at everything now with "New Eyes".
    I have found "A Reality", That feels right for "Me".

    WE ARE MASTERS OF GRAVITY.

    MIXING THE "ELEMENTS WITHIN A PROTON" 11 EXPANSIONS(ALKALI METALS) each overlaps the next, each contains different densities of elements/dark matter/supersymmetric particles. Our universe contains the right amount of matter/dark matter for stable physics and our carbon lifeforms to evolve.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    http://alpha-omega-sunshaker.blogspot.co.uk/?spref=fb

     
  11. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,332

    ZZzzzzzz.........
     
  12. sunshaker Registered Member

    Messages:
    84
    You are right, Most of you on SF are asleep,
    I may not have the math or use OVER complicated equations, but still within these tables I can explain the universe's 16% matter to the 84% dark matter, symmetry between elements, and mass of all particles including Higgs and possible 750GeV bump, and gravity, and all this existing within a "Proton".
     
  13. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    Why do you think any of this stuff is true? Because you came up with it?
     
  14. sunshaker Registered Member

    Messages:
    84
    All I can say, it is "A Truth", to how "I have understood stuff",

    It is not because I came up with this, I am doing what must of us do, trying to put all the information that many great minds have made available to us, into something that makes sense to me.

    To me, "The Periodic Elements" , Where parts of a "larger structure", Which then, Seemed to lead straight back to the Proton.

    I love science like everybody else here, But do not move in science circles, So come to these forums to try and get some feed back, I put it in pseudoscience, as I know it needs a lot of work, and sometimes constructive comments whether for or against can make one delve deeper into certain areas, that can then bring new insights.




    http://alpha-omega-sunshaker.blogspot.co.uk/
    (it is not a blog, just somewhere I could put my ideas on this).
     
  15. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,450
    That makes absolutely no sense at all.
     
  16. sunshaker Registered Member

    Messages:
    84
    I see a proton as a multiverse, A quark as a universe, Which makes any collection of atoms, a collection of multiverses.
    I know you are a fairly intelligent person, you may not understand this or agree with this, It is why I put this in pseudoscience,
    But I was wondering if you or anyone could show this BELOW in an equation form?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  17. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,332
    • Please focus on the posts, not the poster.
    We can't, because it is meaningless quantum woo. Since there are three quarks in a proton, you must think there are just three multiverses.

    Pseudo is the right place for this.

    Are you receiving psychiatric treatment, by any chance?
     
  18. sunshaker Registered Member

    Messages:
    84
    Insults? What are you on? I do not think there are just 3 quarks in a proton(read post 4) is that what you believe!?, I think there are infinite multiverses.

    I thought someone may be able to tell me how to write in a equation form, that the quarks within a proton is equal to universes within a multiverse.
     
  19. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    Well what you think, is wrong.
     
  20. sunshaker Registered Member

    Messages:
    84
    Why? Tell me what you believe is wrong?
     
  21. rpenner Fully Wired Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,833
    Your claim lacks both basis and utility. While the individual words have definitions, nothing connects those definitions into anything like a coherent statement of metaphysics, let alone any branch of science. Your message is too thin on content to be labeled a communicable idea.
    That is not the criterion for being placed in the Pseudoscience forum. This is the correct place for ideas without merit. As you fail to precisely model any phenomena or communicate any utility, your message does not belong in any of the science portions of this website.
    As is evidenced by your graphic, you are willing to abuse mathematical language to dress your message with the trappings of respectable authority without having any respectable content. This too is a demonstration of pseudoscience. You don't understand the fields of math and physics you seek to exploit, so your statement about the number of quarks in a proton has different meanings in different models, a subtlety which seems to escaped both you and exchemist, who at least has a concrete model in mind.

    That you would seek to use an equation, an element of algebra, to express your slogans does not mean that algebra is an appropriate field of mathematics to express your message. You also evidence some concept of the infinite which may not be a mathematical statement and is not an appropriate subject for a statement in algebra.
     
  22. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,332
    OK Sunshaker I've been reprimanded by the moderator for my unkind crack about your mental state, for which I readily apologise.

    I must admit I do find it very hard to say anything constructive about your ideas, so perhaps the best thing will be for me to keep out of your way. All the best.
     
    sunshaker likes this.
  23. sunshaker Registered Member

    Messages:
    84
    Thanks for apology, I do understand where you are coming from, I am not a scientist(as you can tell), but I do understand more than you think.
    I do have trouble trying to show my thoughts in ways others can understand(without complex math).
    But I see these tables as fractals of the universe, Using these tables I get the 16% matter to 84%, and the energy of most known particles/top quarks,
    When I work with these fractal tables, they tell me there should be something with a "mass" of 21,659, 511,424 suns, which is the number of protons of naturally occurring elements(4232) x5,118032 which is the next fractal layer of all protons(normal matter/mirror matter) in mirror tables,
    We just found a black hole 21 billion times more massive than the sun http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/space/stories/ngc-4889-site-black-hole-21-billion-times-size-sun
    This is something I am now thinking upon, but I wanted to be able to try showing some of this using a language others can understand, it is why I asked for help in my previous post(13).To try to make my thoughts understandable to others, whether they agree or not.

    I wanted to be able to say in shorthand, that quarks within a proton is equal to universes with a multiverse.
     
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2016

Share This Page