Thought it would be nice to have a little game on these forums. In most of the other threads people disagree on eachother and there are discussions whether ones belief is true or the other belief is true. In this thread I want to break that tradition. So let's see how far we get without disagreeing. There are only three rules. 1: No disagreement. 2: No oppinions on religion. 3: No sarcasm. Explanations to the three rules: 1: Disagreement also means posting something contradictory to any other post on this thread. 2: I couldn't figure out a way to make it clean and fair without this rule. 3: Sarcasm can be disguised disagreement. This do not mean that you have to agree with what everyone else is saying. It only means that if you disagree you can't post it. Instead you can post something you believe is true (which do not contradict anything else that has been stated on this thread cause that would count as a disagreement).
Using the New Posts link, one gets to see a lot of weird and different threads, that one would not have seen if only browsing his/her favorite subforums
cyperium: 1: No disagreement. 2: No oppinions on religion. 3: No sarcasm. ------------------------------------------------------------- are you playing, fair? you want me to solve some problem someone else has created? nooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i aint playing!!!!!!!!!!!!!! unfairly!!!!!!! cyperium:"Instead you can post something you believe is true " i post this------>"fight for power-war war war" Philosopher Philocrazy
I have a 12 inch Penus!! Now no one can disagree.Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! My penus is not religious. I like all girls from any denomination. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! And I'm not been sarcastic, by stating fact. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Godless. P.S oooohh this is fun!!. lol
I agree, Philosopher Philocrazy should be renamed to plain crazy Everybody can disagre with Godless by not agreeing
I agree that philo-crazy should be called just plain crazy. I agree that this thread should be moved to Cesspool. *(Everybody can disagre with Godless by not agreeing*) Read rule #1. NO ONE CAN DISAGREE!. I've not broken rule # 2 For not basing my religious opinion. Though my name suggests my view. I've not been sarcastic, in any manner. I've not used any foul language to discribe my endowment. Only stated a fact Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!. LOL, having fun yet?. Godless.
I did not break the rule. I said by not agreeing your are in effect disagreeing, do you agree Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! I agree Developing treatments for illneses seem silly if you can develop a cure
LOL!!! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Not quite; The rule specifically states. No disagreements. threfore political double speak that ensinuates for everyone else to disagree need not apply since the first rule is no disagreements do you agree?. Question; do you envy my endowment?. Many do, however sometimes I get dis-agreements from females as well, because of my endowment, NO WAYYYY!! ARE YOU GOING IN THERE WITH THAT!! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! But reality states that there can not be any disagreements, therefore I'm well endowed. Godless. Are we having fun yet?. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
hehe had to look up endowment, why did you misspell penis, Q: Being afraind of words a silly thing? lack of info prevents a reply, Q: Do you agree on, Godless does not dare to post a picture? no, a 24 cm snake in my pocket seems a bit much edit : reworded someof my post
I am SkippingStones. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! What's the difference between a duck?
Well that was a typo! If you were to look at the keys, which I don't when I type, the I&U are next to one another. I'm not embarased by my endowment. I'm very proud to be larger than most, but not the largest. I failed,negleted to correct this typo. Forgive me agree?. Now that would be unethical. And I wouldn't like to hurt the feelings of those who may envy, nor be repulsive to those that would deem such an act of indecency uncalled for. However I can explain. Fully erect is as I stated, I'm a grower not a shower when flacid is about 5" shorter. Thus even flacid it's a well endowed then most. Trouble with such a large member is running without jockstraps, makes my body look awkward since I'm only 5'4" Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! I guess the old fable of tall men with big hands big feet means a large member, is not entirely true. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Thus can we agree that pictures would be unethical? Godless.
I Agree Indeed, hence the dare Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Godless is lying about his endowments, agree?
Here are the results so far: First of all. My interpretation of the failures are correct, cause it is by my own understanding I made the rules. The failure of me to be fair when judging will result in my own rulebreak. That is, by the standard that I judge one person, I have to judge the other. When it's unclear if it is a rulebreak or not, I will give it 0.5 points of rulebreaking. Of course, one has to get as little points as possible (otherwise this ship would sink pretty fast). The numbers on each character indicates the number of failure to follow the rules: Cyperium: 0 points philocrazy: 0 points Lemming3k: 0 points RosaMagika: 0 points Kunax: 0.5 points (+0.5 points) Skippingstones: 1 point (+1 point) Godless: 1 point (+1 point) Reason for points: Skippingstones: You said that you were SkippingStones which means that you contradicted RosaMagica, which said she was skippingstones. Godless: That you didn't "quite" agree, counts as a disagreement. At best if you give good reasons, you can receive 0.5 points for that. But for now I give it 1 point (if you give your reasons, be careful so that you don't disagree Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! ). Kunax: Godless said that he was stating fact. You said that he was lying. This could be counted as a disagreement. But I give you 0.5 points, because I'm unsure of it and it was not obvious that the fact applied to the size of mister jellyfish. If you think I missed something, then you can tell me, as long as it doesn't disagree with anything. If you try to fool a rule by stating that you didn't break it (while, in fact, you did), I will give 1 point for reason unstated and one extra point for sarcasm.
