Question: Will all "normal" men do so? Answer: Doubtful, not everyone has the same ideas about physical attractiveness.
Ummm... What the fuck does that have to do with the age that a sexually functional postpubescent young woman get's to have sex? Are you nuts?
Nope. Just trying to establish what your boundaries are / whether you have any. So. Post-pubescent. Some lucky ladies get pregnant at 12. Are you, potentially, the lucky father of one of their offspring? Is 12 ok - yes? No?
I know for a fact that you are not stupid. So I will assume willful sam-like provocative behavior. Ammend the post to say that the female in question presents a form that a given beholder finds attractive.
How about 9? If they can bleed, they can breed, etc? http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2003/feb/03021802.html
My boundaries are not in question. What are yours? I never said anything about what the age should be and I don't really know the answer. If you really want to know, I think intercourse or exchange of fluids in any way should be discouraged until both parties can conscientiously acknowledge the risks. This of course would disallow many 30 year olds from having sex of any kind.
Perhaps he thinks 9 is too young? Post-pubescent or not. Perhaps he's coming round to the ideas that age of consent laws have some merit?
9... Hey sam? I told you I would do this... BITE ME! Anyway I think the age of consent should be 14 to 16 with parental consent, 17 on up - free will. How's that? Happy?
I'm a man. Back on the savannah my ancestors were fucking anything with body hair (and there was a lot of it about in those days). Hence, nowadays, age of consent laws. Yes? No?
Read my previous responses. I did NOT say they were without merit. I said I thought they were currently stupidly formulated and that 16 was "dubious" as the age at which many men begin to find females attractive.