In other threads I have repeatedly pointed out problems with the theory of SR. After many many attempts to show simply what the problems were, the rash of attacks and distortions leveled at the efforts made the results unclear to others. (That is they sucessfully confused the issue to a point that others lost interest). However, I have continued to sharpen my pencil and narrow my focus to reduce the debate to very specific and clear issues. James R, one of several antagonists that like to make personal attacks and cast innuendos, interject appeals to authority and make other irrelevant posts, has now failed to respond with valid rebuttals for two critical issues involving SRT. 1 - The issue of "Reciprocity" advocated and inherent in SRT. That is the fact that there has not been ONE case in the 100 year history of Einstein's relativity where reciprocity has been observed, recorded in data, or even successfully argued as being physical possible. 2 - Now I have asked him to please post what the gamma function is for two clocks, "A" and "B" which have a relative velocity of 0.866c. He has refused now (4) times. He refuses since he now knows that I can unequivicably and very clearly show it is false. I suggest ALL relativists stop spreading their fiat, dogma, rhetoric, if they are unable to properly address these key issues. Just a note, not that it will have any bearing of course on posters here but personal attacks and innuendo will not get you off the hook. It will however make it clear that I am correct and you have no valid response. Post away.