They use a wide range of medical, behavioral, psychological tests to determine her qualities. Is there someone outside of what is considered scientific data that I perceive when I see my daughter - or even a stranger's daughter who I spend a little time with - that this team will not notice. Note: when I say notice in reference to what the scientists' notice, I mean things that would be considered scientifically valid observations. Of course this team will likely notice things that I am not aware of. That she tends to be sullen after lunch - when I tend to be a work - that she has this or that ration of hormones in her blood. Why all sorts of things. But then, isn't there something that we as fellow humans notice about each other - and not just fellow humans but also animals, specific landscapes, plants - that is knowledge of these other beings, but is considered projection, qualia, sentimental attachments or reactions and not scientifically valid? If I can perceive things about fellow humans, some that can be put into words - though live metaphors may be necessary - some I cannot put into words, that goes beyond at least current science, might there not also be parallel knowledge about non-human life forms. In a sense this is a kind of Mary's room question..... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary's_room though my bone of contention is not with physicalism, per se, here, but rather the eradication of all things called subjective as not being real or as real as hypothetically objective science - especially its metaphysics and especially as current science is generally conflated with some final understanding.