A few Apollo Hoax videos that disappeared are back

Discussion in 'Conspiracies' started by FatFreddy, Oct 22, 2020.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. David C The print that nails this troofer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    306
    This is unbelievably simple. The Moon reflects on average 12% of infrared received. At zenith it is radiating all that heat towards the Lunar module, it is also conducting some through the legs. The collective heat from the Command Module and Lunar Module together would overheat the cabin very quickly, so there is more temperature control.

    No checkmate, just basic physics. Try not to spam your off topic videos in other threads!
     
    paddoboy likes this.
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    778
    This would have to be proven mathematically. What you posted falls far short of being proof.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    778
    That comes from this video.

    Apollo 15 Digging a trench

    (2:40 time mark)


    We would have to see an overhead view of it to know if it's as fine as this one.
    https://wp-assets.futurism.com/2019/02/lawyer-sell-apollo-moon-footprints-600x315.png

    We can't tell if it only has the detail that this print has.

    MoonFaker: Footprints On The Moon Set, Ralph René Was Correct! PART 1

    (6:32 time mark)


    Anyway, there's a ton of other proof that the missions were faked so this is really a moot point.
    http://www.sciforums.com/threads/did-we-go-to-the-moon.134682/page-2#post-3151173
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    778
    If you put it on full screen and set the speed to .25, it can be seen that the dust in your captured frame does indeed fall back down before the astronaut does.

    The Apollo Moon Jump Salute Refute
    https://www.brighteon.com/612d782a-9223-4698-99ac-3eb337ceedf5
     
  8. David C The print that nails this troofer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    306
    Prove what mathematically?

    http://lunarpedia.org/index.php?tit...do for the,Sun, so we never see it from Earth.

    "For the Moon, the average albedo for the solar spectrum across the lunar surface is 0.12"

    https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/EnergyBalance/page2.php

    "The average intensity of solar energy reaching the top of the atmosphere directly facing the Sun is about 1,360 watts per square meter"

    1,360 * .12 = 163 watts being reflected per square meter!! That doesn't include conducted heat through the legs.

    The trouble with you is that you have not the slightest idea about science and not the slightest ability to assess anything honestly.
     
  9. David C The print that nails this troofer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    306
    Oh and the other trouble with you is that you are a quite appalling liar.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    You CANNOT "put it on full screen" or slow it down - it is a gif!! Any honest eyes can view the parabolic arc between his boots and see it rise in time and begin to fall in time. This obviously doesn't include those in repetitious denial. Enhanced and slowed:

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Totally and painfully obvious.
     
  10. David C The print that nails this troofer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    306
    No, really "we" wouldn't. You are in denial. It is a clear and obvious print being made at the same point as fine dust is kicked a ridiculous distance from a tiny boot movement! We can see the tread pattern very obviously. The idiot Jarrah White's "experiment" is unable to produce any print at all in a lunar dust replicant.

    Yes "we" can. That is a deliberately staged photo opportunity. Oh and just so you know, Ralph Rene was a total imbecile.

    It is not a moot point. Every rock solid un-debunkable piece of proof we landed on the Moon is discarded by you, because you are a coward. Every single piece of your useless wall of spam debunked is also ignored by you. You will avoid this next question at all costs.

    Without referring to your wall of spam, any Youtube idiot video or some conspiracy buffoon website, in your own words - YOUR OWN WORDS. list your top 5 pieces from your "ton of other proof"!!
     
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2020
  11. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    778
    I put the video on full screen and slowed it down. I think that was pretty clear in post #44.
     
  12. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    778
    A lot of my own words are in here.
    https://www.giraffeboards.com/showthread.php?t=31034

    The moderator banned me and changed the title of the thread (see post #561).

    A lot of the links in post #1 are dead but the fresh ones are on later pages.

    edit
    -------------------------------------

    I was looking through that thread and I found some stuff I'd forgotten about.
    https://ufospotlight.wordpress.com/2017/06/28/3848/
    https://www.giraffeboards.com/showpost.php?p=1290961&postcount=170
    http://www.moonfaker.com/documents/Metapedia-Moon-Hoax/
    http://theconspiracyzone.podcastpeople.com/posts/27709
    https://www.giraffeboards.com/showpost.php?p=1470560&postcount=266
     
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2020
  13. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,534
    That moderator is needed here. How many other forums have you been banned from FF?
    What for? spamming? lying? ignoring the overwhelming evidence in favour of your hear say nonsense?
    And no, I still havn't watched any of your contrived video u tubes, as your history preaching nonsensical crap and lies, speaks for itself.
     
  14. (Q) Encephaloid Martini Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,834
    Way to go, moderator! You da man! Well deserved, the OP was pure gish-gallop spam.
     
  15. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    778
  16. David C The print that nails this troofer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    306
    Listen very carefully. You are lying, I know you are lying and every person reading this knows it. It is very clear and obvious from the slowed down enhanced gif that there is a parabolic arc of dust between his boots that clearly and without any doubt falls as he does. You are avoiding it:

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!




    Without referring to your wall of spam, any Youtube idiot video or some conspiracy buffoon website, in your own words - YOUR OWN WORDS. list your top 5 pieces from your "ton of other proof"!!

    HERE!!! In a list, 5 bullet points, your best evidence.

    You're not going to do it are you, because once you do you open up your tactic of throwing shit at a wall and hoping some sticks.

    You should be banned from the internet, you are a public nuisance. You tell so many lies and evade so many things you must be quite mad. If I was a moderator here, you would be in a thread all of your entitled "My rubber room".
     
  17. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    778
  18. David C The print that nails this troofer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    306
    You really want to table those stupid claims as your top 5 do you? That is some real dumb shit.

    "Without referring to your wall of spam, any Youtube idiot video or some conspiracy buffoon website, in your own words - YOUR OWN WORDS. list your top 5 pieces from your "ton of other proof"!!

    HERE!!! In a list, 5 bullet points, your best evidence."



    Which part of the word "HERE" is confusing you!!?


     
  19. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    778
    I could copy and paste the info here but what's the point? You can read it there just as easily. Why should I take the trouble?
     
  20. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    23,592
    Mod Note

    Why are you advertising other forums on this site?

    Secondly, why are you posting links from other forums where you are literally outed as a troll and where they referred to your so called evidence as being pure and utter crap? I guess that explains why they banned you.. You do realise that your links aren't helping you, right?
     
  21. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    778
    My intent wasn't to advertise; he wanted a list and those were ready-made lists. It would have taken me half an hour to post all that stuff. I did it to save time.

    I don't think this reflects reality. I think those posters are paid sophists* who know the moon missions were faked as well as the hoax-believers do. Paid sophists have the attitude that they're winning a debate the whole time they're losing. I think they banned me because their success rate at making the viewers think the missions were real was close to zero.


    *
    https://www.clubconspiracy.com/counter-intellegience-tricks-and-techniques-t4702.html
     
  22. David C The print that nails this troofer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    306
    That is a lie. It will take quite literally 5 minutes to type 5 bullet points with a simple link to your wall of spam.

    Nobody cares what you think. You are a dishonest troll who avoids evidence.

    Five simple proofs:

    • On the Jump Salute, the dust between his boots shows he cannot be on wire support. This proves he must be in low gravity.
    • On Gene Cernan's approach to the rover, soil he kicks lands at the same time as he does. This proves he is not on wire support and must be in low gravity.
    • On the Digging a Trench video soil ejected will only drop at Earth freefall when the speed of the video is adjusted to 245%. Motion looks absurd, proving it must be running at the correct speed at 100%.
    • 842lbs of peer reviewed lunar samples, including 3 metre core samples. Impossible to fake, not meteorites and not from Earth.
    • On the idiotic film American Moon a section shows a flat surface falling with no dust disturbance in the direction of fall. This proves they are in a vacuum and in a considerably massive one!

    There you go, took me 5 minutes and you have no honest answer to any of those - all of them prove we landed on the Moon.
     
    Hipparchia likes this.
  23. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    23,592
    Mod Note

    And yet here we are..

    You advertising links to other forums, encouraging users to go there to read it there, instead of you putting in the legwork and actually posting your responses, with evidence [cough] here.


    But they weren't lists.

    All you linked was to another forum, where some dumbass mouth breathing foil hat wearing yokel linked youtube videos instead of actual scientific research and data to back up his claims.


    No, you didn't.

    You linked to another forum because you are lazy for starters.

    There is zero content in what you linked. It was, and I quote "Gish Gallop of willfully ignorant observations"..

    Secondly, there have been numerous threads about the conspiracies by morons about how they think the moon landing was fake, all of which has been debunked, all of which have been closed because they have been debunked.

    So I have to ask, why did you think it was acceptable to open yet another one with the same rubbish as the previous ones?

    And worse still, you started this one and peppered it with links to other forums, asking readers here to go to these other sites to read it, where the dumbass who posted it there is banned for being, well, a conspiracy laden fool...?


    Dude, you think everything is fake.

    So I don't think your definition of reality matches that of reality.


    At some point, it will sink in that it's not everyone else, but you..

    I'm not even going to bother pointing out the irony here.

    There is a mountain of evidence that details just how the conspiracy is wrong. Forcing people to rehash it over and over again is kinda boring and dumb.

    Linking to other forums to the idiocy of others as evidence or proof is equally boring and dumb and also not the done thing on any forum.

    Reopening threads that have essentially been closed in the past, and then encouraging people to basically go elsewhere..

    You not only interfered with moderation by starting yet another thread on this subject, when it was already closed, but you did it and advertised another website.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page