100,000 UK Muslims support terror attacks on UK

Discussion in 'World Events' started by madanthonywayne, Jan 29, 2007.

  1. Mr.Spock Back from the dead Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,938
    thats depend. if i was a muslim and muslim blow themselves up, about 100000 muslims would support them i would immigrate on my own.

    as for the nazis, they claimed jews control the world, jews are rats and inferior etc. none of them i claimed on mulsims. the only propaganda here is yours.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Ghost_007 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,170
    What the fuck are you on about?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Mr.Spock Back from the dead Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,938
    sorry im wrong. muslim dont blow themselves up. silly me. :bugeye:
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Ghost_007 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,170
    So I should leave?!?!

    Hahahaha, you’re fucking stupid. You talk some shit, you know that? Hahahaha

    I’m laughing my arse off here, fucking hell.

    Marry me. :m:
     
  8. Mr.Spock Back from the dead Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,938
    no, you should live cause 100000 muslims supports this acts. all fair in love and war.
     
  9. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    SamCDKey:

    You do realize that Afghanistan aided and abetted terrorists that slaughtered 3,000 of our people and did tens of billions of dollars of damage, including a tremendous amount of cancer rates here in New York?

    Zakariya04:

    I do believe a lot of the time their targets are in the midst of crowded markets and in apartment buildings and such. The fact that if they do not retaliate that these people continue to attack Israel makes them good targets, despite the collateral damage.

    Yes.

    Very well thought out, I must say.

    I must say: If I ever see a Saudi prince, I must remember to do something nice for him!
     
  10. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,824
    I had no idea the Afghans had invaded the US? I thought it was the other way around?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    And weren't the mujahideen trained by the CIA?
     
  11. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    SamCDKey:

    Afghanistan aided and abedded Al'Qaeda, which did not invade us, but attacked us. You know, through blowing up civilian jetliners by ramming them into our buildings.

    I'm sure you're aware of this news event, right?

    Also, yes, we did. Because the Mujahideen > Soviet Russia. We trained them in the 80's to kill our enemy and to stop their aggression. Another example of US support of Moslem freedom fighters who aren't insane terrorists, but just become so once they take over their government years after our assistance.

    Moreover, what is this? Like the dozenth time you've mentioned the CIA in the last three days?
     
  12. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,824
    So you train and fund fundamentalists and dictators and then are surprised because they behave like fundamentalists and dictators?

    DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUH!
     
  13. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    SamCDKey:

    Actually, we've had little problem with the dictators we've propped up. Only Saddam Hussein bit us in the ass afterwards.

    Training the Muhajideen wasn't a great idea when they turned on us, but guess what? Better for them to kill the Soviets and hasten the demise of that evil empire.

    Moreover, nothing we've done to help the Muhjahideen in Afghanistan in the 80's can be said to be directly linked to their hatred. In fact, everything we did should make them perform fellatio on us out of gratitude. They'd have been crushed by the Soviet war machine if not for American assistance.

    Also, wonderful strawmen, SamCDKey. Since when is your religion's support of terror in the UK related to US support of the Afghan liberators in the 80's?
     
  14. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,824
    Umm NATO? British soldiers? Immigrants from Pakistan (or Afghanistan), Palestine, Iraq, Lebanon? British support of US policies?
     
  15. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    SamCDKey:

    Our defeatist immigration policies that are leading to Western decline owing to the racial and religious makeup of the immigrants, certainly has nothing directly to do with our involvement in Afghanistan in the 80's.

    That's a whole other animal.

    Moreover, once again, the Muhajideen should be orally satisfying us for giving them a chance against the Soviets. Afghanistan would be a People's Republic if not for us.

    And the British support American policies as you know, we both don't want to be blown up by Moslems.

    NOr can we attribute American involvement in starting fundamentalism. Islam has been in the dark ages for 200+ years and a similar movement started in the Sudan 100 years ago and in Chechnya about 150.
     
  16. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,824
    You need to read some history.
     
  17. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    Apparently, you've never heard of the Mahdi? The Mad Mullah?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammed_Abdullah_Hassan

    Or how about Imam Shamil?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imam_Shamil

    And what has Islamic "civilization" done for the last 200 years? Even you yourself speak of India's decline from the apparent "Golden Age" (of domination and invasion) of Mughal India to the British Raj.

    When did the Ottoman Empire become a joke?

    When did the whole Middle East come under foreign domination?

    North Africa?

    Islam, as a civilization, is in its worse period. A dark age with little hope so long as the religiousity is kept.

    Clearly, it is you who needs to read history? I suggest any college level text book on the matter.
     
  18. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,824
    Like I said, you need to read some history. You can start with the links you posted.
     
  19. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    NEW FROM PRINCE JAMES INDUSTRIES! It's the SamCDKey Game!

    Here's its SIMPLE RULES:

    When any conversation starts up, chime in about the CIA!

    When India's corruption is mentioned, deny it and blame the British!

    When history soundly refutes her on both a historic and political foundation, deny that she is the one in need of education!

    Claim that the US and Britain are worth all blame - never even speak up against Al'qaeda and other terrorists! Include tacit support for the Iraqi insurgency and complete disregard for their slaughtering of other Moslems, specifically women and children!

    Derail threads with all of the above!

    And hide behind moderator status to avoid any backlash!

    Do all this and you, too, can be SamCDKey! Order today! Just 19.99!

    If you call right now, we'll even throw in the Genji and Ghost 007 special editions! Two cronies for the price of one!
     
  20. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,824
    More humbug.

    You forget we went through all this BS with the British ourselves.

    Bhagat Singh was hung as a traitor for resisting occupation among many others.

    And branded a "terrorist". Guess what? We got a right a fight to defend our country and kill the assholes who side with the invaders. Its called treason.

    Perhaps that is why we can see through the BS.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  21. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    Of course he wasd labelled a traitor. The legitimate government was the British crown. Just like the Mughals before them, they conquered India in the name of a foreign power. Accordingly, resistance was held to be treasonous.

    But yes, I bet you extend this to the massacre of civilians in Iraq? Anything for "freedom" now, SamCDKey?
     
  22. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,824

    Glad you think we should give our country over to occupiers. Welcome to your future.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    (And no, those Iraqis are plumb crazy. Good to know they'll soon be democratic and deciding on their own government, eh?)
     
  23. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    If you wanted resistance, perhaps you should have done that when the British first came to your shores? Or perhaps resist the Mughals before that?

    And who do you think will be occupying us? Mexico?
     

Share This Page