# 【1 paradox】Why 0.999... is not euqal to 1?

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by jeddysin, Mar 12, 2012.

Not open for further replies.
1. ### Pincho PaxtonBannedBanned

Messages:
2,387
1/infinity = 0.infinity... should be something like that. The problem with losing the infinity is that you lose the total sum of parts. The total sum of parts is infinite. so.. 0.infinity... = 0.3,0.2,0.1,0.09 forever.

Last edited: Mar 13, 2012

3. ### jeddysinGuest

Yes, you all succeed to used a wrong theory in proving a wrong answer.

5. ### gmilamValued Senior Member

Messages:
3,055
The OP or the attachment? The attachment was/is grabled and the OP is incoherent.

7. ### Crunchy CatF-in' *meow* baby!!!Valued Senior Member

Messages:
8,423
Actually, I proved the correct answer via math. It's real proof. Nothing you do or say can change that.

8. ### jeddysinGuest

My OP is clear and conclusive. Maybe you need a Chinese teacher.

9. ### jeddysinGuest

You are brainwashed and you get nothing but a error. I can deduce the exist of God, design a real AI-system.

OK.That is all.Go to find the "1", Meta-sample-space. Resolve all the probability paradox, for example, birthday paradox.For God, there is no paradox.

Last edited by a moderator: Mar 13, 2012
10. ### Crunchy CatF-in' *meow* baby!!!Valued Senior Member

Messages:
8,423
You are welcome to show the error in my math.

I would love to see you "deduce" the existence of 'God'. So first question, which 'God'? Designing a real AI-system makes you about as special as any other person who can. Either way, it is utterly irrelevant.

How about you show me where my math is in error instead?

11. ### Crunchy CatF-in' *meow* baby!!!Valued Senior Member

Messages:
8,423
General challenge:

I have \$5 that says the opening poster is probably a deluded crank and this thread will ultimately end up in the Cesspool. Any takers?

12. ### jeddysinGuest

I've told you the current mathematic theory is totally a paradox, but you still use it to prove you are right. Can a wrong theory get a correct answer? To read some about 2012, go to understand China, something about it.

Learn to think like a normal man.

13. ### jeddysinGuest

Go to play starcraft 1, design a real AI-system for it, let it play the game like a human being, using probability theory.

14. ### gmilamValued Senior Member

Messages:
3,055
Chinese - no, I'm in Texas. I'd get more use out of learning Spanish.

And you might get more use out of learning some math.

15. ### Crunchy CatF-in' *meow* baby!!!Valued Senior Member

Messages:
8,423
You "telling me" something is a paradox doesn't actually make it a paradox. If you want me to accept what you are saying then you have to demonstrate it as true (which has not been done). For example, here is my demonstration that I am correct:

1 / 3 = .333...

1 = .333... x 3

1 = .999...

You are welcome to show where this is incorrect. If you cannot then the thought in your mind doesn't correspond to reality (i.e. it's false).

I am completely uncompelled to research something that has not been demonstrated to have any value. That's stupid of you to even suggest it.

What if I am a woman? What then? This is another stupid suggestion.

16. ### Crunchy CatF-in' *meow* baby!!!Valued Senior Member

Messages:
8,423
Why do you keep making these retarded requests?

17. ### AlexGLike nailing Jello to a treeValued Senior Member

Messages:
4,304
Your op is ambiguous and muddled. As are all of your subsequent posts.