·I have just been on a forum of sycophant,immature bunch of wallies ever...they havn't got a scrap of intelligence between them
therefore are :incendiary messages ·inflammatory remarks ·rude or insulting messages ·vicious attacks ·nasty and often profane diatribe · derogatory, obscene or inappropriate language ·overheated prose ·derisive commentary, and so on! in a case like this... does one become psychophantic like them or do you reply to them with overheated prose ?
:)

Isn't it spelt "sycophant"?

Originally posted by Redoubtable
Isn't it spelt "sycophant"?

yes it is , but psycho -phant is more appropriate!!!!

you are full of shit. You are a vicious little psycho. You banned everybody and tried to delete half the forum.

and now you come up with this fake story.

Originally posted by spuriousmonkey
you are full of shit. You are a vicious little psycho. You banned everybody and tried to delete half the forum.

and now you come up with this fake story.

I think spurious has over done it this time , I think he should be banned...this barrage of inflammatory rmarks, rude or insulting messages , derogatory , obscene or inappropriate language would not be allowed on any other forum...spurious I think you have overstepped your mark this this time...mods please do the decent thing..

sure thing blueapples.

in case anyone was wondering:

the PM i mentioned in the some people thread (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=25505)

Blueapples Member 72 posts bastard Right fucking Spurious..if I ever see you I will punch your fucking lights out . you are the most underhanded bastard that I have ever met...if and when you come back to the other forum you fucking cretin...I will be ready for you , you fucking spastic!!! reply to this message | forward this message | 07-12-03 at 08:01 PM < Last Message Next Message >

was of course by blueapples.

He then flipped in the ciardini forum (http://www.ciardininet.co.uk/Partagium/index.php) as an administrator. He went on a banning rampage and deleted half the forum. Until the owner banned him and restored the forum from a backup.


see also this thread (http://www.ciardininet.co.uk/Partagium/viewthread.php?tid=421) in the ciardini forum.


and blueapples is using also a double identity here, since he is IXL777.

anything I forgot IXL777?

oh yes...his last PM:

Blueapples Member 72 posts Re: THE KING LIVES quote: spuriousmonkey wrote on 07-15-03 08:53 PM: quote: Blueapples wrote on 07-15-03 10:51 PM: who is the pscho now!!!! you as always spurious ...the trouble with you is you do not have any loyalty.....therefore you are like the whore who wants to be liked by everyone.........you have the backbone of a snake..... reply to this message | forward this message | 07-15-03 at 10:59 PM < Last Message

calm down spurious , this is the sci-fi..this thread is about sycophants and you fit the
bill....

you can't play mental games with me, because this means nothing to me.

try someone more unstable.

Originally posted by Redoubtable
Isn't it spelt "sycophant"?

isn't it spelled "spelled" ?

:D

I can back up everything Spurious said. A very comical episode in this chapter of my life indeed.

The owner wasn't pleased he was banned at all. Looks like someone doesn't know how to conduct themselves online *cough*blueapples*cough*

:rolleyes:

And wait, hold on a minute. Another thing that proves blueapples intelligence (or lack thereof) that he calls us all sychophants meaning that we suck up to people to gain favour.

I don't see no sucking up, I see putting down but no sucking up!

and blueapples is using also a double identity here, since he is IXL777
Took a while for it to click but I saw the writing style was the same when these two got angry.

yeah, then he claimed to me this:

Hello Johnny, I want to thank you for letting me use your forum for a study case in flaming...Our University is keeping an eye on some of these younger forums to assess their potential in high risk measures,....
What is a flame? Simply, flames (or flaming) are hostile and aggressive interactions offer a review of the types of characterizations that have been offered to date: ·incendiary messages ·inflammatory remarks ·rude or insulting messages ·vicious attacks ·nasty and often profane diatribe ·derogatory, obscene or inappropriate language · overheated prose ·derisive commentary, and so on! Generally speaking, Why is a flame…? A majority of the people on your forum are young and immature and government officials are keeping a keen eye on your threads...many of your posters are under age for adult literature.
"Because people experience disinhibition on the Internet and feel relatively free of serious adverse consequences because of physical distance and reduced accountability, they often use tactics that go far beyond what they might use in person." Traditional lab studies ) – routinely found higher percentages of remarks containing swearing, insults, name calling and hostile comments , this is not acceptable , and we have found through research that psycho..peoPle could do a lot of damage..we will be keeping a close eye on your forum
DR.D...FGIW, CFGH, BHUY COUNCIL OF TRADE...
p.s kitty is too young to be on the forum,

blueapples, your the physco!!!!

Oh no, I've already pointed out lots of reasons why that's BS, I can't be bothered to do it a second time :(

lol, i hear ya!

Originally posted by mars2112
isn't it spelled "spelled" ?


It's either way. Type "spelt" into dictionary.com . . . if you doubt the veracity of my claim . . .

My verdict: OCB

Blueapples, your a sick puppy, I hope decent folks can get help to you soon! :D :D :D

prooving my point that you put a few hair brained sychophants together and this the tpe of replies you get..my data is building up.......interesting thoughts

Maybe we should post a few more of your emails here blueapples/ixl777.

Originally posted by shrek
Blueapples, your a sick puppy, I hope decent folks can get help to you soon! :D :D :D
Shrek.....At least I can stand up for myself....

I have enough data on you lot for my UNI. psychology dept.to create a scientific paper on sychophantic, grovellers and flamers.

("you are full of shit. You are a vicious little psycho")quoted spurious...are these the words of a mature person doing a PhD!
more the mind of psychopath.

quote by Thor:And wait, hold on a minute. Another thing that proves blueapples intelligence (or lack thereof)

...there we go again Thor .. CONCEITED,arrogance, ignorance,you are still a baby as far as education is concerned.......who has the PhD?.....i CANNOT EVEN SEE YOU GETTING YOUR DEGREE.......you have a closed german mind.!

and Johnny...you do not give someone authority and then undermine them ...you do not deserve to run a forum, you have the intelligence of 8 year old......my uni is doing a paper on flaming ..and all this data will go towards it..

Originally posted by Blueapples
Shrek.....At least I can stand up for myself....

my uni is doing a paper on flaming ..and all this data will go towards it..

I look forward to reading it, hope you'll be publishing a copy on the web soon.

A little flaw in your plan, why ban someone for being "negative and sarcastic" when you could have tried to entice them into a few angry posts to help back up your theories?

Also banning the bloke who created the forum in the 1st place would seem alittle stupid, as would deleting half the forum, now thats just spiteful!

Strikes me if your not talking garbage here, then your research is going to be somewhat short of what you'd require to submit a decent paper, in my humble opinion!

Still its all happy days once more in cyber space, even if there is the odd "negative and sarcastic" posting from my goodself!

Oh here we go again. I think I'm gonna cry, I can't take much more of this abuse. I'm so weak, oh please help me, I can't get past this far superior mind that blueapples seems to have

:rolleyes:

Right, let me repel this small scale invasion

I have enough data on you lot for my UNI. psychology dept.to create a scientific paper on sychophantic, grovellers and flamers
Fine, tell me your full name and what University you go to. I want to report you for misconduct. As a psycholgoy student myself I know that I have the right to withdraw at anytime. I therefor request that you withdraw me from this "experiment".

...there we go again Thor .. CONCEITED,arrogance, ignorance,you are still a baby as far as education is concerned.......who has the PhD?.....i CANNOT EVEN SEE YOU GETTING YOUR DEGREE.......you have a closed german mind.!
Fighting fire with fire, I hope you're includinging yourself in this little "experiment" of yours. And yes I know it's you IXL, the whole arrogant thing. You have already proved that your English isn't that good, you don't seem to know what half the words you just said even mean. And it's very pathetic to see you resorting to putting me down because of my age. It's been done before. You're just a playground bully who has got his comuppance time and time again. And I dare you to call me closed minded again hypocrite. Don't preach what you do not follow

and Johnny...you do not give someone authority and then undermine them
Well you do not go over the goddamn owners head for crying out loud, It's like a sargeant going over a generals head. Christ, open you friggin' eyes

you do not deserve to run a forum, you have the intelligence of 8 year old
Well the fact he owns the site tells us otherwise

my uni is doing a paper on flaming ..and all this data will go towards it..
I find this very hard to swallow.

I can only hope you have the common curtosy to reply to my reply as fully as possible

Edit: Two more people have asked to be withdrawn

Shrek and Spurious

You are missing the point Shrek...I am getting exactly the reaction I thought would happen....do a bit of flaming and a few negative replies..and people of little or no intelligence assume the high ground and all the replies that I have had which include
insulting messages , derogatory , obscene or inappropriate language is the exactly the data I expected to get..

quote:thor" You have already proved that your English isn't that good, you don't seem to know what half the words you just said even mean. "
...there you go again thor arrogance , ignorance , conceit...I have the PhD.....YOU HAVE NOTHING , BUT YOUR VANITY ...prooving again that ignorance is bliss in you case...listen again Thor...I have the PhD. AND YOU DON'T.
This barrage of inflammatory remarks, rude and insulting messages confirm the very research that I am doing.....

Thompsen & Foulger (1996) – used a fictional series of posts between Dr Ski and Snow Pro that increased in antagonism and disagreement; asked people to rate them on a scale from not a flame to flaming; the point at which a message crosses over to ‘flaming’ is the point at which some tension is detected and then attacks and foul language definitely constitute a flame; smileys in a really nasty message just made them look sarcastic. There is an important distinction to be made between disagreement and aggression and/or conflict.
This is exactly the same route I have taken and the data still comes out the same

Looks like curtosy isn't as common as I once thought :rolleyes:

You are missing the point Shrek...I am getting exactly the reaction I thought would happen....do a bit of flaming and a few negative replies..and people of little or no intelligence assume the high ground and all the replies that I have had which include insulting messages , derogatory , obscene or inappropriate language is the exactly the data I expected to get..
I would like to ask what the IV and the DV are?

.there you go again thor arrogance , ignorance , conceit...I have the PhD.....YOU HAVE NOTHING , BUT YOUR VANITY ...prooving again that ignorance is bliss in you case...listen again Thor...I have the PhD. AND YOU DON'T. This barrage of inflammatory remarks, rude and insulting messages confirm the very research that I am doing.....
Well you do know this is flawed right. This experiment isn't a valid experiment of flaming. If you provoke someone you are bound to get a responce. Just like in everyday life. Wars happen like this but on a grander scale. I doubt you'll pass this. Must I go into the whole 'You're so arrogant and ignorant thing' again, I'm so bored of that. It got dull last month. I think I'm right, you think I'm right. Everyone agrees with me, you deny this then cry about it. Get over yourself.
This so called 'barrage' is only a retort to what you have sent to me. Should I just sit here and go "Oh well, he's insulting me. Guess I'll just sit here some more". No, I stand up for myself and that is exactly what I'm doing. Do not put me down because I have values!
And it was not a sign of arrogance, it was merely an observation bacuse you love to use those words but you have no grounds to use them thus you have no idea what they mean.

Blueapples/Ixl777 Your research would be classified as unethical. I would like to report you. Where is this study performed?

:D Blueapples, you make me laugh! Just re-read you post above and I think you'll find your displaying most of the faults you acuse others of having!!!

Anyhow as Thor has already stated I wish to play no part in your so called experiment or anything you write subsequently.

Disclaimer - the above is a non-agressive, non-abusive, non-sarcastic posting, just incase you thought otherwise Blue!

and apparently the experiment is continuing because I have just received this PM from Blueapples/IXL777

Blueapples Member 75 posts Re: experiment quote: spuriousmonkey wrote on 07-16-03 09:03 AM: I demand to be withdrawn from this experiment signed spuriousmonkey ---- bollocks you wanker......you are the experiment //you fit the sychophantic bill to the T. reply to this message | forward this message | 07-16-03 at 11:18 AM

Exactly why I want to report him, he didn't ask for consent, he only debriefed when confronted, hasn't protected his participants at all and it looks like he's not letting us withdraw.

I want your name and where you are studying. I want to report you for misconduct.

Shrek, apparently that's his point, to provoke us into flaming. He alls it flaming, I like to call it self-defense. He is the flamer here, we are the flamees

FINE..shrek and spurious are taken out of my data but to repeat to thor...
You are missing the point Shrek...I am getting exactly the reaction I thought would happen....do a bit of flaming and a few negative replies..and people of little or no intelligence assume the high ground and all the replies that I have had which include
insulting messages , derogatory , obscene or inappropriate language is the exactly the data I expected to get..

quote:thor" You have already proved that your English isn't that good, you don't seem to know what half the words you just said even mean. "
...there you go again thor arrogance , ignorance , conceit...I have the PhD.....YOU HAVE NOTHING , BUT YOUR VANITY ...prooving again that ignorance is bliss in you case...listen again Thor...I have the PhD. AND YOU DON'T.
This barrage of inflammatory remarks, rude and insulting messages confirm the very research that I am doing.....

Thompsen & Foulger (1996) – used a fictional series of posts between Dr Ski and Snow Pro that increased in antagonism and disagreement; asked people to rate them on a scale from not a flame to flaming; the point at which a message crosses over to ‘flaming’ is the point at which some tension is detected and then attacks and foul language definitely constitute a flame; smileys in a really nasty message just made them look sarcastic. There is an important distinction to be made between disagreement and aggression and/or conflict.
This is exactly the same route I have taken and the data still comes out the same

what is your controlgroup then?

Wait what, deja vu. Didn't you already say that to me. Oh well, best bend over and take it I guess. Yeah friggin' right.

So you're not taking me out of the experiment? I want all "data" you have from me removed from the experiment and that no new data be collecting regarding me being flamed.

Flaming is when someone intentionally starts an arguement with someone else. Noone here started anything but you! You are the only one here flaming. The rest are merely defending themselves, including me. I seriously doubt you will get good credit on this paper as it is indeed the most invalid experiment I have yet witnessed.

Blueapples Member 75 posts Re: experiment quote: spuriousmonkey wrote on 07-16-03 09:03 AM: I demand to be withdrawn from this experiment signed spuriousmonkey ---- bollocks you wanker......you are the experiment //you fit the sychophantic bill to the T. reply to this message | forward this message | 07-16-03 at 11:18 AM
Again I want your name and where you study (be it a nursery or otherwise). I want to report you.

Originally posted by spuriousmonkey
what is your controlgroup then?

sorry spurious you have been taken out of the experiment....that does not concern you.....if you have any positive input to put in I would be grateful......try sticking to the point ..theres a good chap!!!

I believe that is the point. An easy escape methinks. I believe you don't even know what a control group is.

:rolleyes:

Originally posted by Thor
I believe that is the point. An easy escape methinks. I believe you don't even know what a control group is.

:rolleyes:

Here we go again..conceit , arrogance , ignorance...it is a deep rooted GERMAN TRAIT.....with your arrogance you should be goosestepping around to your nearest fascist group...a little humility from you Thor would go a long way

"quote:I believe you don't even know what a control group is.

ARROGANCE..IGNORANCE....VANITY....DISORDERED REASON...

Originally posted by Blueapples
Here we go again..conceit , arrogance , ignorance...it is a deep rooted GERMAN TRAIT.....

Is that not classified as racist?

I presume mods don't stand for that! If I where to make the same assessment based on the colour of someone's skin there'd be an outcry. So what makes you think you can get away with it when basing the assessment on nationality?

QUOTE:Looks like curtosy isn't as common as I once thought ..

"COURTESY."..THOR that is how you spell it....see, through your arrogance , you cannot see your ignorance...

Originally posted by shrek
Is that not classified as racist?

I presume mods don't stand for that! If I where to make the same assessment based on the colour of someone's skin there'd be an outcry. So what makes you think you can get away with it when basing the assessment on nationality?

An arrogant conceited German is an arrogant conceited German in any language......he can't even spell!!!!

Wellity wellity wellity wellity. I hope you know who you're messing with, I'm someone who will grow up into one of the worst people known to man. A lawyer.

here we go again..conceit , arrogance , ignorance...it is a deep rooted GERMAN TRAIT.....with your arrogance you should be goosestepping around to your nearest fascist group...a little humility from you Thor would go a long way
Well as you must already know, that little, tiny experiment conducted by Stanley Milgram proved that behaviour is not a genetic trait. Oh but you would already know that being a Psychology student. And how can it be a deep rooted German trait if both parents are English? And that's a very minimalistic view point and also very ethnosentric and rasict. I would've thought Gould would have taught you this one. You don't seem to be very bright. What do you do, use the lectures as bedtime?

ARROGANCE..IGNORANCE....VANITY....DISORDERED REASON...
Just says to me that you do not infact know what it means.

You out of all people must know I can go on like this for a very long time. When I'm right I stick to my guns, I never argue if I might be wrong.

And you not giving me your name and study centre is a sign of non-compliance. You are by far the worst psychology student I have seen and I can't see how you could be doing a phd in it if you haven't even grasped the basic that I learnt in my first weeks in AS :rolleyes:

Now come on, we all know there is no experiment. And we all know you had no right to ban and attempt to delete half of someone elses forum. That's a criminal offense you know.

Originally posted by Blueapples
An arrogant conceited German is an arrogant conceited German in any language......he can't even spell!!!!

You said it was a "German Trait", well thats a massive generalisation, that I consider to be racist and not relevent to this discussion.

Pathetic, can't find any ground to fight me on so you try and use whatever mistakes I use against me. You're no more than the common schoolyard bully. Okay, so I mispelt courtesy, whoop di do. Well as long as you know how to spell it, learn what it means and get some yourself.

An arrogant conceited German is an arrogant conceited German in any language......he can't even spell!!!!
Nationality has nothing to do with it. This is getting funnier by the post blueapples. Keep them coming. I'm lapping this up. I made one spelling mistake and you hold it to me. You can't even conduct a proper psychology experiment, shall I hold that to you?

Edit to add: Thank you Shrek. It is indeed a massive generalisation, completely irrelevent and shows his immediate lack of historical knowledge. Arrogance is not a German trait, if it is how come you have it? How come your seeping arrogance from your pores? If you really are a psychology student (which I seriously doubt you are) the basic studies would disprove all of this.

there you go againthor:quote "You are by far the worst psychology student I have seen and I can't see how you could be doing a phd in it if you haven't even grasped the basic that I learnt in my first weeks in AS "...arrogance , ignorance and conceit...a person who has not even gained his degree yet...thor
learn a bit of humility....its not a German trait.....

You're saying I need to be more humble? Being right makes me less humble? Lookie here Mr. I-have-a-phd-so-I'm-right, you haven't quite seemed to grasp the concept yourself.

..arrogance , ignorance and conceit...a person who has not even gained his degree yet...thor
It's amusing to see that I don't need a phd to see that you're full of BS don't you think.

Look, your experiment has no Ecological Validity nor does it have any control. It is therefor not an good experiment. You need to have at least one of those to have a successful experiment. Also you need a proper aim. You're seeing the effects of flaming. Okay, you're flaming us. The result, we're defending ourselves. What more do you want?

I have just been on a forum of sycophant,immature bunch of PEOPLE ever...they havn't got a scrap of humility between them
therefore are :incendiary messages ·inflammatory remarks ·rude or insulting messages ·vicious attacks ·nasty and often profane diatribe · derogatory, obscene or inappropriate language ·overheated prose ·derisive commentary, and so on! in a case like this... does one become psychophantic like them or do you reply to them with overheated prose ?

I think the data I am receiving has fulfilled all expections , about arrogance , ignorance, conceit, vanity and sychophancy..it has highlighted the negative inflammatory remarks,rude and insulting messages, vicious attacks and inappropriate language.

therefore Why do we flame…? "Because people experience disinhibition on the Internet and feel relatively free of serious adverse consequences because of physical distance and reduced accountability, they often use tactics that go far beyond what they might use in person..people like thor who think they are greater than though..., routinely found higher percentages of remarks containing swearing, insults, name calling and hostile comments will become apparent.

Making the connection between frustration and aggression, I suggest that this might be one key to understanding online aggression – anything which thwarts our attaining goals – especially when we are very close to it. – and the potential misinterpretation of lags; the tolerance for lags naturally varies and often according to our cultural expectations about silence in conversation
2.compensating for time delays with abbreviations and succinct messages – average message about 6 words 3. ‘net splits’ are another source of frustration – when the connection between servers is broken 4. problems with navigation – when you can’t find what you want Any kind of unpleasant event can lower one’s threshold for aggressive response – that aversive stimulation triggers a state of ‘negative affect’ – i.e. it pisses you off! It is this which can lead to disproportionate, misdirected and, ultimately, self-justified responses. (c) The two faces of anonymity We have already considered how the relative anonymity (although not always the case) of CMC can have positive effects in terms of disinhibition, self-disclosure, and intimacy. It is, however, pretty obviously, another explanation for online aggression:

"When people believe their actions cannot be attributed directly to them personally, they tend to become less inhibited by social conventions and restraints."
THIS HAS BEEN AN INTERESTING EXERCISE....

Right, I'm asuming that's what you've got so far on your paper?

And the only flaming witnessed so far is from you. Can't you even see that!?! You're flaming people here and everyone is retorting. It's something called self defense and standing up for themselves. It's an extremely common human trait and being the bigshot psychology student here you must know that already, right? Wrong.
You can't seem to get a grip on the idea that you can't just go somewhere, insult someone and then expect to get away with it.

I only hope this is an experiment conducted on your behaviour alone or otherwise it is more or less doomed.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Thor
[B]Right, I'm asuming that's what you've got so far on your paper?

the case is shut Thor......just read the post before yours....

Well I got a glimpse of the uneditted version. You just wrote some crap and then tidied up the language.

I expected it to be longer myself. And it is extremely flawed and I'd be amazed if anyone buys that.

I know that you're no psychology experiment and you are not a psychology student. You can't fool me. Please, oh please, show me a shred of evidence that disproves my theory.

And I'm also awaiting your full name and centre of study so I can report you. You're not fit to study psychology let alone conduct an experiment. Non-compliance only proves it's a sham

know that you're no psychology experiment and you are not a psychology student. You can't fool me. Please, oh please, show me a shred of evidence that disproves my theory.

Arrogance ,ignorance and conceit and underhandedness..Thor in your case.
as I expected the experiment would show...the case is now closed..

I have just been on a forum of sycophant,immature bunch of PEOPLE ever...they havn't got a scrap of humility between them
therefore are :incendiary messages ·inflammatory remarks ·rude or insulting messages ·vicious attacks ·nasty and often profane diatribe · derogatory, obscene or inappropriate language ·overheated prose ·derisive commentary, and so on! in a case like this... does one become psychophantic like them or do you reply to them with overheated prose ?

I think the data I am receiving has fulfilled all expections , about arrogance , ignorance, conceit, vanity and sychophancy..it has highlighted the negative inflammatory remarks,rude and insulting messages, vicious attacks and inappropriate language.

therefore Why do we flame…? "Because people experience disinhibition on the Internet and feel relatively free of serious adverse consequences because of physical distance and reduced accountability, they often use tactics that go far beyond what they might use in person..people like thor who think they are greater than though..., routinely found higher percentages of remarks containing swearing, insults, name calling and hostile comments will become apparent.

Making the connection between frustration and aggression, I suggest that this might be one key to understanding online aggression – anything which thwarts our attaining goals – especially when we are very close to it. – and the potential misinterpretation of lags; the tolerance for lags naturally varies and often according to our cultural expectations about silence in conversation
2.compensating for time delays with abbreviations and succinct messages – average message about 6 words 3. ‘net splits’ are another source of frustration – when the connection between servers is broken 4. problems with navigation – when you can’t find what you want Any kind of unpleasant event can lower one’s threshold for aggressive response – that aversive stimulation triggers a state of ‘negative affect’ – i.e. it pisses you off! It is this which can lead to disproportionate, misdirected and, ultimately, self-justified responses. (c) The two faces of anonymity We have already considered how the relative anonymity (although not always the case) of CMC can have positive effects in terms of disinhibition, self-disclosure, and intimacy. It is, however, pretty obviously, another explanation for online aggression:

"When people believe their actions cannot be attributed directly to them personally, they tend to become less inhibited by social conventions and restraints."
THIS HAS BEEN AN INTERESTING EXERCISE....THE CASE IS NOW CLOSED.

Originally posted by Blueapples
I think the data I am receiving has fulfilled all expections , about arrogance , ignorance, conceit, vanity and sychophancy..it has highlighted the negative inflammatory remarks,rude and insulting messages, vicious attacks and inappropriate language.


ok let me get this straight.

You ban shrek for being funny.

I want to support my friend (does this emotions belong to any of the categories: arrogance , ignorance, conceit, vanity and sychophancy? I thought it was loyalty). I make a thread in which I ask for him to be unbanned.

You take away my PMing rights on that forum and demand loyalty to you.

I continue the thread and you ban me.

I email a standard email to the owner of the forum stating that I am banned and I think it is unfair.

He undoes the banning.

You ban me again.

he undoes the banning and warns you not to ban me anymore.

you flip and ban everyone and try to delete the forum. Send pshycho emails and messages to as many people as possible.

The owner then restores order, and bans you and your ISP.

Now...where is the experiment. And where were we whatever you claimed us to be?

Non-compliance proves that it is a sham. You are no psychology student nor was this a psychology experiment. If someone who has only taken a year of psychology can see this it means you're not very good at bluffing. Take it from me, I live in an area where everyone isn't who they really are. We call them sheep.

Arrogance - The act or habit of arrogating, or making undue claims in an overbearing manner; that species of pride which consists in exorbitant claims of rank, dignity, estimation, or power, or which exalts the worth or importance of the person to an undue degree; proud contempt of others; lordliness; haughtiness; self-assumption; presumption.

Ignorant - 1. The condition of being ignorant; the want of knowledge in general, or in relation to a particular subject; the state of being uneducated or uninformed.

Ignorance is the curse of God, Knowledge the wing wherewith we fly to heaven. --Shak.

2. (Theol.) A willful neglect or refusal to acquire knowledge which one may acquire and it is his duty to have. --Book of Common Prayer.

Invincible ignorance (Theol.), ignorance beyond the individual's control and for which, therefore, he is not responsible before God.

Conceit - A favorable and especially unduly high opinion of one's own abilities or worth

Underhandedness - Marked by or done in a deceptive, secret, or sly manner; dishonest and sneaky.

Right, just put all of your words through a dictionary to get proper definitions for you as you seem to be unclear as to what they mean.

You are arrogant. You are also ignorant of this. This means you cannot see that you are arrogant. This makes you blind. A blind man is easy to strike. You are a conceitious person and you are the one who has the underhandedness. This thread is proof of all of this.

If I cannot make you see your errors my way, I'll use your words against you.

Big words don't make a big man. Nor do big words make a valid arguement. I was expecting a half decent reply from you. I have been disappointed. You have been outwitted, outgunned and outclassed with your weak arguments and your "experiment" plauged with holes even I can see.

You have been defeated yet you do not accept that, I admire you persistance but I find it somewhat pathetic to see you grasping at straws to try and bring me down.

In short, get a life, if not, find someone else and share half a life.

I say good day

Edit: Any psychology student knows it is not called a case. That is law. It is reffered to as a Psychogolical Study, or study for short. :rolleyes:

The owner then restores order, and bans you and your ISP.
he did not ban me, I negated it myself....loyalty in your case is none existent..sychophancy is....The research was interesting

I have just been on a forum of sycophant,immature bunch of PEOPLE ever...they havn't got a scrap of humility between them
therefore are :incendiary messages ·inflammatory remarks ·rude or insulting messages ·vicious attacks ·nasty and often profane diatribe · derogatory, obscene or inappropriate language ·overheated prose ·derisive commentary, and so on! in a case like this... does one become psychophantic like them or do you reply to them with overheated prose ?

I think the data I am receiving has fulfilled all expections , about arrogance , ignorance, conceit, vanity and sychophancy..it has highlighted the negative inflammatory remarks,rude and insulting messages, vicious attacks and inappropriate language.

therefore Why do we flame…? "Because people experience disinhibition on the Internet and feel relatively free of serious adverse consequences because of physical distance and reduced accountability, they often use tactics that go far beyond what they might use in person..people like thor who think they are greater than though..., routinely found higher percentages of remarks containing swearing, insults, name calling and hostile comments will become apparent.

Making the connection between frustration and aggression, I suggest that this might be one key to understanding online aggression – anything which thwarts our attaining goals – especially when we are very close to it. – and the potential misinterpretation of lags; the tolerance for lags naturally varies and often according to our cultural expectations about silence in conversation
2.compensating for time delays with abbreviations and succinct messages – average message about 6 words 3. ‘net splits’ are another source of frustration – when the connection between servers is broken 4. problems with navigation – when you can’t find what you want Any kind of unpleasant event can lower one’s threshold for aggressive response – that aversive stimulation triggers a state of ‘negative affect’ – i.e. it pisses you off! It is this which can lead to disproportionate, misdirected and, ultimately, self-justified responses. (c) The two faces of anonymity We have already considered how the relative anonymity (although not always the case) of CMC can have positive effects in terms of disinhibition, self-disclosure, and intimacy. It is, however, pretty obviously, another explanation for online aggression:

"When people believe their actions cannot be attributed directly to them personally, they tend to become less inhibited by social conventions and restraints."
THIS HAS BEEN AN INTERESTING EXERCISE....THE CASE IS NOW CLOSED.You will have to justify your actions to yourself....and see your true personality....

Total bulldink! He banned you outright! You went on a deleting and banning spree. You even banned the owner! So he banned your sorry ass. Something he shoulve done a while ago. You seemd to think that you moderator status meant you could do anything. You then found out that you couldn't, went on a hissy fit and then came here and you are still in that same fit.

Edit: I will repeat Blueapples, do not preach what you do not follow. You are the uberhypocrite

Blueapples, is that why you always hide your e-mail address whilst those you banned didn't?

I've never posted anything online I wouldn't say face to face.

You've still not explained what your PM's to banned members and the webmaster did towards proving your points, where you wanted to "punch there lights out".

Yep, I picked up on that too Shrek. The resort to 'If I see ya, I'll deck ya' is such a laughable approach commonly used by the schoolyard bully. Do as I say or you'll get a beating! That kind of thing.

Only furthers the point that this person is very immature and is in need of help.

Originally posted by Thor

Only furthers the point that this person is very immature and is in need of help.

He's in luck we do free help sessions at my rugby club, next ones on the 9th August!!!

The above statement is loaded with sarcastic content!

Hey Blueapples, you called our forum "sad" and "immature", however i found that the only "sad" and "immature" person there was you.
I found the banning of my friend from his own forum incredibly immature, I dont understand why you needed to do this.
Your posts on our forum wern't even original, they were copied from sciforums!! This shows such a lack of imagination and isnt that Plagerism?
Whilst you had control of ciardininet you ruined it, you made it boring and turned it into your own personal forum, bossing everyone around, pretending to be 'The great I am!'
Im glad you've been banned, because we put our trust in you, and now that you've gone the fun and harmony has been restored to the forum.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Deity Jupiter
HARMONY JUPITER YOU HAVE THE BRAINS OF A ROCKING HORSE..the forum was a forum for very immature giggling schoolgirls, the threads were enough to make you puke...if you want to come on to a proper forum and start flaming...then piss off:) sucking up johnny is pure sycophancy....kindegarten stuff..grow up you pleb

Originally posted by Blueapples
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Deity Jupiter
HARMONY JUPITER YOU HAVE THE BRAINS OF A ROCKING HORSE..the forum was a forum for very immature giggling schoolgirls, the threads were enough to make you puke...if you want to come on to a proper forum and start flaming...then piss off:) sucking up johnny is pure sycophancy....kindegarten stuff..grow up you pleb

Does anyone else think its funny how such a mature, clever chap can't even use "quotes" properly! I seem to recall you having the same problem on the925!

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Thor
[B]Yep, I picked up on that too Shrek....LISTEN TO YOURSELF THOR...
thor you are THE MOST ignorant arrogant person..were do you get your authority from , you havn't even a piece of paper to show that you are qualified in anything..and yet you set yourself up as an authority...ARROGANCE CONCEITED ..YOU ARE AN AUTHORITY IN PSYCHOLOGY....YOU HAVN'T EVEN GAINED A DEGREE YET..WHAT A POMPOUS ASS...THESE ARE GERMAN TRAITS...
Get some authority , then you can speak with authortity...you pleb!!

Originally posted by Blueapples
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Thor
[B]Yep, I picked up on that too Shrek....

Bluebells I hope you managed to pick up on the fact I was talking about you?

Thor has demonstrated the art of "quoting" in all most text book fashion throughout this thread!

Originally posted by shrek
Does anyone else think its funny how such a mature, clever chap can't even use "quotes" properly! I seem to recall you having the same problem on the925!

shrek ..if you had any brains you would be dangerous.....grow up you pleb!!!

[QUOTE]Originally posted by shrek
[B]He's in luck we do free help sessions at my rugby club, next ones on the 9th August!!!


YOU WOULDN'T KNOW A DECENT GAME OF RUGBY IF YOU SEEN IT...LEAGUE..you want to see a proper of rugger you pleb!!!

Originally posted by Blueapples
YOU WOULDN'T KNOW A DECENT GAME OF RUGBY IF YOU SEEN IT...LEAGUE..you want to see a proper of rugger you pleb!!!

still experimenting?

Originally posted by Blueapples
shrek ..if you had any brains you would be dangerous.....grow up you pleb!!!

Round of applause!

But I see in your next thread (unless its been edited!) regarding rugby, you have again lost the art of "quoting"!

Originally posted by Blueapples
YOU WOULDN'T KNOW A DECENT GAME OF RUGBY IF YOU SEEN IT...LEAGUE..you want to see a proper of rugger you pleb!!!

Blue, your entitled to your opinion of rugby, I find it laughable I'm the one needing to grow up when you throw in a statement like that! What next my dads bigger than your dad?

Originally posted by spuriousmonkey
still experimenting?

I'm starting to think he's the experiment and care in the community really isn't working!

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Thor
[B]Yep, I picked up on that too Shrek....LISTEN TO YOURSELF THOR...
thor you are THE MOST ignorant arrogant person..were do you get your authority from , you havn't even a piece of paper to show that you are qualified in anything..and yet you set yourself up as an authority...ARROGANCE CONCEITED ..YOU ARE AN AUTHORITY IN PSYCHOLOGY....YOU HAVN'T EVEN GAINED A DEGREE YET..WHAT A POMPOUS ASS...THESE ARE GERMAN TRAITS...
Get some authority , then you can speak with authortity...you pleb!!

Right, okay. What right do you have to waltz into someone elses forum and then take charge and change it to the way you want it? None whatsoever. You set yourself up as an authority, you are teh one who started flaming, you are the one who is arrogant and immature, you are the only one who deserved to be banned.
And yes you copied almost all of your threads from Sciforums most likely without the owners permission.


HARMONY JUPITER YOU HAVE THE BRAINS OF A ROCKING HORSE..the forum was a forum for very immature giggling schoolgirls
God, where did you get that insult? 1987? The forum was how the owner liked it, I found it a refreshing change. Everyone had an opinion and you, being Hitler incarnate, didn't like it.

if you want to come on to a proper forum and start flaming
Yes, yes, lets all be like blueapples, everyone come on, ruin a forum, start flaming, lets all rejoice in the glory that is blueapples

kindegarten stuff
You should know, you only left yesterday

LISTEN TO YOURSELF THOR...thor you are THE MOST ignorant arrogant person
Fine yes, you've pointed this out already, be original for fuck sake! I don't care what personal insults you make against me, I'm not waivering a single bit. I think it's pathetic and very amusing you try and act all 'ard.

you havn't even a piece of paper to show that you are qualified in anything
Whereas you have and it automatically makes you right? Someone throw this guy a bone. You don't need an education to have an opinion! Get off your single track mind and get with the picture, please.

YOU ARE AN AUTHORITY IN PSYCHOLOGY....YOU HAVN'T EVEN GAINED A DEGREE YET
neither have you, so that makes us even. But I just happen to be able to point out the flaws in your "experiment" which musn't make you very bright at all

WHAT A POMPOUS ASS...THESE ARE GERMAN TRAITS...
There is no such thing as a fucking German trait!! get over yourself you racist, single, adolesant minded, controlling, manipulative, lying son of a bitch.

Get some authority , then you can speak with authortity...you pleb!!
Why don't you get some authority yourself. I am only standing up for what is right. You are the bad guy here, not me. You are the one who deliberatly tried to ruin someone elses property (Don't get me started on the legal issues here) and then you try to pass it off as an experiment to keep what little dignity you had. And now it's gone.

You do know that I will never give up, as long as you reply I will debunk everything you say, and do you know why? Because I can, and it's very easy to. I can't believe you have a degree, you're one of the most moronic people I have the misfortune to have encountered.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Deity Jupiter
HARMONY JUPITER YOU HAVE THE BRAINS OF A ROCKING HORSE..the forum was a forum for very immature giggling schoolgirls, the threads were enough to make you puke...if you want to come on to a proper forum and start flaming...then piss off sucking up johnny is pure sycophancy....kindegarten stuff..grow up you pleb....

Originally posted by Blueapples
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Thor
[B]Yep, I picked up on that too Shrek....LISTEN TO YOURSELF THOR...
thor you are THE MOST ignorant arrogant person..were do you get your authority from , you havn't even a piece of paper to show that you are qualified in anything..and yet you set yourself up as an authority...ARROGANCE CONCEITED ..YOU ARE AN AUTHORITY IN PSYCHOLOGY....YOU HAVN'T EVEN GAINED A DEGREE YET..WHAT A POMPOUS ASS...THESE ARE GERMAN TRAITS...
Get some authority , then you can speak with authortity...you pleb!!

Is it not spam when you keep re-posting the same things over and over again...................

Originally posted by Blueapples
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Deity Jupiter
HARMONY JUPITER YOU HAVE THE BRAINS OF A ROCKING HORSE..the forum was a forum for very immature giggling schoolgirls, the threads were enough to make you puke...if you want to come on to a proper forum and start flaming...then piss off sucking up johnny is pure sycophancy....kindegarten stuff..grow up you pleb....

And again, maybe its not spam, just a delayed cyber stutter!

quote; There is no such thing as a fucking German trait!! get over yourself you racist, single, adolesant minded, controlling, manipulative, lying son of a bitch.

hit a raw nerve did we..and you do not call these a german trait...

No it's spam, it's total spamming. I thought it was against the rules here...maybe I'll look it up. It's usually the way it goes.

But blueapples is like the uberspammer, he just copies the same recycled shit over and over again

This is a worthless thread.