Illuminati script: Timothy McVeigh 2001 + Kostas Kenteris 2004 + Jan Ullrich 2006 = Marion Jones 2007 Marion Jones 2007: Was the terror agenda upscaled to the utter limits? Matt Marriott explained how the illuminati had no problems upscaling their terror agenda, by gradually introducing these BIG LIE techniques as proof: - the "defense lawyer" (1); - manufactured evidence (2); - hearsay (3). Now by having the "Marion Jones concedes doping" headlines today all over illuminatiland, did they upscale the terror agenda yet one more time? To the ultimate limits, with their media falsely reporting that a public personality, who is NOT in prison, admits to be guilty? Not yet. These headlines were released because the illuminati, after manufacturing the "Marion Jones letter to her family" with her "confession", finally could force Marion Jones to also "confess" for the camera. How the illuminati forced Marion Jones to "confess" for the camera No wonder the illuminati finally defeated Marion Jones: - She is now totally broke after spending all her money in "courts" fighting the illuminati agents used to defame her in the last three years; - she knew that if she continued to resist now the terror agenda would have been upscaled to the utter limits: she would be jailed without having an opportunity to state in the media that the letter was a hoax. And like ever since her persecution begun, only the Illuminati End Times Prophet would be telling the truth about it, in some internet forums for a restricted audience, as brainwashed as the rest of the society. (4) Why did the illuminati wait three years to execute Marion Jones? What was the reason of not having executed Marion Jones immediately as it was the case for example with Justin Gatlin, the 100 m world record holder who was forced to "confess" 2006 using the same terror methods? The reason was that the goal of making people believe that Marion Jones was really on drugs as she won the gold medals over the years is better served, with her "confession" after she spent all her energy and money defending herself for the last three years. Or in other words one of the ultimate goals of the doping conspiracy: totally discredit ANY champion in the past, since "Marion Jones was on drugs and tests could not detect it" -> "any gold medalist who tested negative was probably also on drugs". In particular "if the performance was overwhelming then that was certainly the case". (5) Notes (1) The "Defense Lawyer" technique was first used with the innocent who was falsely accused of the Oklahoma city bombings. It consists of having the "defense" lawyer falsely stating that his "client" admits to be guilty. This technique was planned to be used with Milosevic in the Hague "Court". But it did not work as planned, since Milosevic had the possibility to communicate to the public that he did not accept the "defense" lawyer the "court" assigned to him. (2) "Manufactured evidence" is the technique used again and again to falsely accuse the best athletes of mesurable natural sports (athletics, cycling) in the world that they dope, with faked "tests" in the illuminati laboratories. In 2004, 5he physical attack against Kostas Kenteris, supervised by IOC President Rogge, was a first upscaling of this technique. It was planned to suggest that the Greek sprinter was trying to create an alibi to escape doping tests. Besides that it was a way to physically get him out of the scene, which was precisely the Olympics 2004 at his own country, Greece, so that people did not wonder why he was not being given the word to tell his story in the media. (3) "Hearsay" as proof was first used in the hours before the beginning of the Tour de France 2006. Not because it was required to eliminate the two best cyclists at the start, Jan Ullrich and Ivan Basso, since the illuminati control the laboratories that do the Tour tests. The reason why the Hearsay technique was used was to upscale the terror agenda. In the Tour de France 2007, this technique was upscaled again, using the danish cyclist Rasmussen, who was eliminated as it was clear he would win, based on a statement of an italian journalist who played the role of having "seen" him in Italy at a time where Rasmussen declared that he was in Mexico. (4) End Times Reductionism: 2004 - the truth was voiced by ONE (ironically on a site which is today the last bunker of the official supporters of nuclear Hitler)... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1294431/posts 2007 - all masks out, and yet... the truth is voiced by ONE and only one. (5) Reminder: the reason to select Marion Jones as their victim was the fact that in the Sydney 2000 Olympics she won the 100 meters with the greatest margin ever over the silver medalist.
In this thread with now 12,000 views, this article, the only one claiming that Marion Jones was another victim of the doping conspiracy, was deleted: http://mb.trackandfieldnews.com/discussion/viewtopic.php?t=27989&start=360 The article was also deleted from all other major athetics forums.
