The Great Global Warming Swindle

Discussion in 'Earth Science' started by madanthonywayne, Mar 5, 2007.

  1. madanthonywayne Morning in America Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,461
    A new documentary exposes the "groupthink" behind the issue of global warming. How it has become an article of faith and anyone with the temerity to question its tenents is damned as a heretic. This is not science, and this is not good. The people behind this documentary are not a bunch of yahoo's.
    So what do they have to say:
    Many here are fond of saying, "Even if global warming isn't driven by CO2, there's no harm in cutting back on emisions". Of course, they are wrong. The problem is opportunity cost, money spent on CO2 abatement is not available for anything else. If it turns out that CO2 isn't really much of a problem, wasting all those billions would be criminal.
    I generally point out how the draconian energy controls required to reduce CO2 emmisions would destroy the American economy. The film points out the impact on poor nations would be even worse.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    I disagree that cutting CO2 will have no economic benefit. The war in Iraq alone, important mostly for the oil reserves there, will soon rise to a cost of around 2 trillion dollars. Alternative energy will be a new boom industry, like the dot-com boom of the 90's. In any case, oil production is already below demand, and a struggle for the last remaining oil will be costly, if not armageddonish.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Carcano Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,865
    Nice work Anthony...and a good summary of all the points Ive written about on this forum for a long time.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. URI IMU Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    729
    >> the "groupthink" behind the issue of global warming. How it has become an article of faith >>>
    Oh it is much worse than that, the deciders of our world's fate are totally bonkers

    see this

    >> Amazing mixture of conjecture and supposition re Earth's Climatic history by
    Kerry Emanuel a professor of meteorology at MIT

    http://bostonreview.net/BR32.1/emanuel.html

    Here is a snippet of total garbage

    >> And yet for all this sensitivity, the earth never suffered either of the climate catastrophes of fire or ice. In the fire scenario, the most effective greenhouse gas—water vapor—accumulates in the atmosphere as the earth warms. The warmer the atmosphere, the more water vapor can accumulate; as more water vapor accumulates, more heat gets trapped, and the warming spirals upward. This uncontrolled feedback is called the runaway greenhouse effect, and it continues until the oceans have all evaporated, by which time the planet is unbearably hot. One has only to look as far as Venus to see the end result. Any oceans that may have existed on that planet evaporated eons ago, yielding a super greenhouse inferno and an average surface temperature of around 900°F.>>

    Comment
    First Venus has no water. A run away greenhouse effect can not occur with water. The run away greenhouse effect on Venus is cause by methane, Carbon Dioxide Sulphur dioxide and other gases.

    Second all the sea water could not be evaporated into the atmosphere, simply because clouds will form as some atmospheric strata and thus prevent further warming.

    Water is what makes Earth unique. Water manufactured by LIFE acts as a thermostat against thermal overload. Ice on the other hand floats on water and reflects light back to space, ensuring the land and the sea can not get too cold. >>>>


    This article by Professor Emanuel is rather interesting because it shows the blinkered science, the mixture of conjecture and supposition that must have been fed into the computers to create the climatic projections of the boffins.

    The rest of this article is not much better.. I would not trust this man to look after my pet rock.
     
  8. madanthonywayne Morning in America Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,461
    The "consensus" is begining to fall apart. Here's another example:
     
  9. URI IMU Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    729
    >> global warming as over-hyped and an environmental concern of second rank.>>

    Another stupid scientist.. metal/mental poisoning is rife in this world, and no one understands

    The world is drying out, dying and they are all running around as if (a) it is natural or (b) we got in under control, have another beer!!!

    And none of them can add 2+2 and answer 4....

    >> "The cause of this climate change is unknown," >>

    Of course it is known
    There is petroleum oil in the marine micro layer of anthropogenic origin, known for almost a centry... reported by every marine micro layer biologist and even NASA...

    Oil on water reduces evaporation, no clouds, no rain, no snow, no life.

    LOL I can not believe this world

    and still no one listens, perhaps they never will

    DEATH of LIFE on this planet.
     
  10. swivel Sci-Fi Author Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,494
    Tell that to Colorado which saw record snowstorms this winter. Or upstate NY.

    Where is your data to demonstrate decreased cloud cover? Significant and steady drops in rainfall levels?
     
  11. Baron Max Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,053
    Colorado has been in drought conditions now for numerous years, and that INCLUDES years with record winter snowfall.

    As to New York state, the record rainfall and snowfall will do like its done for several thousand years ...run off through rivers and streams to the ocean. And they'll still probably experience drought conditions again this year.

    Baron Max
     
  12. Facial Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,225
    The film will never win an Oscar.
     
  13. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    Baron Max:

    Actually, we generally don't suffer too badly from droughts here in NY, either in the city or in the state.

    We tend to have a lot of rainfall all year round and our reservoirs are rarely at a low-level for more than a month or so.

    NY also has tons of glacier grooves that make for tons of ponds, streams, small rivers, and lakes. These are almost always filled.
     
  14. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    [ENC]Global Warming[/ENC] on Sciwiki
     
  15. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    MadAnthonyWayne:

    I utterly agree with the economic issues. Any and all pollution problems should be solved through pragmatic solutions that keep our economy - and that of other countries - in prosperous conditions.
     
  16. swivel Sci-Fi Author Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,494
    I don't care what the water does when it lands, I was wondering what proof the poster above had for decreased rain due to oil slicks.
     
  17. URI IMU Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    729
    >> Where is your data to demonstrate decreased cloud cover? Significant and steady drops in rainfall levels? >>

    LOL, you live in the Northern Hemisphere... lot of land up there, little sea.... y'all are drying out but the picture in the NH is complicated because of ice melt overlaying the salt water, and land water still drying out

    LOL, you should study the Southern Hemisphere... all the research is NH centric...silly people.
    give it a couple of years and y'all will be dust...
    The USA is in the grips of some drought... about 50% land mass and so are many other places in the NH.
     
  18. URI IMU Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    729
    >> proof the poster above had for decreased rain due to oil slicks.

    a whole lot of proof
    Natural Consequences
    see http://omegafour.com/forum/
     
  19. swivel Sci-Fi Author Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,494
    I give it 5,000 years or so before an organism evolves which feeds on this oil. (single-celled microbe or algae) When they get done, our descendants will lament the loss of the "oil layer" and the extinction of this glorious microbe. They will put some in a Microscopic Zoo, and wonder what the environmental effect will be for all of humankind.
     
  20. madanthonywayne Morning in America Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,461
    But don't we already have genetically modified microbes that eat oil?
     
  21. URI IMU Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    729
    >> WonderMicrobes is a multi-culture concentrate available in liquid form.

    LOL, you will treat the whole ocean with your artificial chemicals and mutated bugs ?..

    Crazier than I ever thought
     
  22. swivel Sci-Fi Author Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,494
    Yes. Eat the whole ocean. :bugeye:

    How did we go from "eating oil" to "eating ocean"?
     
  23. URI IMU Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    729
    >> How did we go from "eating oil" to "eating ocean"?

    the oil is over the surface of the ocean.... LOL

    thats a big area, and a very big volume
     

Share This Page