Most Iraq victims white and rural

Discussion in 'World Events' started by infoterror, Jan 5, 2007.

  1. Buffalo Roam Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,931
    Here are stories from recognized News Agencies, that have a lot of information on the what happened to the WMD's, again I can provide supporting documentation, and what does spurious offer his opinion?

    FrontPage magazine.com :: Iraqi WMD Mystery Solved by Jamie Glazov
    On the tapes, you hear Saddam discussing the assistance of Russia and Brazil ... media that Russian Spetsnaz units moved Iraqi WMD into Syria and Lebanon . ...
    http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21489


    Ex-Official: Russia Moved Saddam's WMD
    "They were moved by Russian Spetsnaz (special forces) units out of uniform, ... The evacuation of Saddam's WMD to Syria and Lebanon "was an entirely ...
    http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/2/18/233023.shtml?s=lh

    Russia Moved Iraqi WMD
    "I am absolutely sure that Russian Spetsnatz units moved WMD out of Iraq ... According to Shaw, Russian units hid Saddam's arsenal inside Syria and in ...
    http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/3/2/230625.shtml

    Russia Moved Some Iraq WMD To Syria & Lebanon ยป Netscape.com
    (www.intelligencesummit.org) ,"WMD Saddam bought from the Russians went was that they went to Syria and Lebanon... They were moved by Russian Spetsnaz ...
    http://news.netscape.com/story/2006/10/16/russia-moved-some-iraq-wmd-to-syria-and-lebanon

    Amazon.com: Saddam's Secrets: How an Iraqi General Defied ...
    General Sada shows us how Syria went from being an enemy of Iraq to a an ... and Russian intelligence and others could have been wrong regarding the WMD and ...
    http://www.amazon.com/Saddams-Secrets-General-Survived-Hussein/dp/1591454042

    Jack Kelly: A Syrian sidestep?
    "Saddam realized this time the Americans are coming," Mr. Sada told The New ... said Russian Spetsnaz units moved WMD to Syria and Lebanon's Bekaa Valley. ...
    http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06036/649858.stm

    - toledoblade.com -
    Article published Saturday, February 4, 2006 Saddam's WMD ... said Russian Spetsnaz units moved WMD to Syria and Lebanon's Bekaa Valley. ...
    http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060204/COLUMNIST14/602040352/-1/COLUMNIST

    WorldNetDaily: Surprise, surprise! Saddam had WMDs after all
    That Russian Spetsnaz (special forces) units evidently helped Saddam's military in secreting away โ€“ mostly into Syria โ€“ WMD that had first been purchased ...
    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49221
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. GeoffP Caput gerat lupinum Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,087
    Interesting.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Nickelodeon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,581
    It seems speculation is enough to make something a fact. Just like the pre-war hype. I noticed there was no actual visible evidence, just "oh it might have been WMD" so they assert it was WMD. It doesn't sound any different to most of the "evidence" we were told before the war, plenty of speculation with all the caveats removed.

    Syria and Saddam may have shared common interest but they distrusted each other deeply.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Buffalo Roam Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,931
    So you automatically dismiss all this information out of hand? Interesting, why don't you dismiss all the information that says there were no WMD in Iraq, there are enough report like those I posted to raise doubt as to the non-existence of WMD's, We know that Saddam still had WMD's after the First Gulf War, why? because he used them, on the Kurds, the Marsh Arabs, and in a lot of small operations to punish any one who his paranoia he thought might be a threat. Please refute the first article, I don't think you can, provide site information to prove you opinion.
     
  8. vslayer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,969
    were saddams WMD any more dangerous than yours? is the average iraqi better off now that you have taken away the (somewhat insane, bit still stable) government and left them in a civil war? did anyone except wealthy americans benefit from this war?
     
  9. Nickelodeon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,581
    Becasue you bombed a country and invaded it on the basis that you knew that there were WMD, that you knew where it was, that it was incontravertable. Any articles saying there were no WMD may have been wrong too, but you went to war on a "certainty".

    How did Saddam use WMD on the Kurds after the First Gulf War? With a no-fly zone? Which particular events are you referring to?

    Refute what? An opinion? There was no evidence in that article. Just speculation.
     
  10. Zephyr Humans are ONE Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,371
    How does 'Iraq victims' become limited to the 3000 US soldiers who've died there when hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have been killed? I don't think most of them are 'white'...
     
    Last edited: Jan 5, 2007
  11. cpt.scruffy The Future's Coolest Guy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    73
    i'm calling bush an asshole,
    since he can do way better things than
    dealing with terrorism in absolute.
    fuck that noise.
    like actually saving the world.
     
  12. cpt.scruffy The Future's Coolest Guy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    73
    ah im being a hippy,
    someone could easily tear me apart in politics.
    i'll go, i'm just giddy right now.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  13. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Q: Why was the US certain Saddam had WMDs?

    A: Because they gave them to him.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  14. Buffalo Roam Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,931
    samcdkey, sorry to burst you bubble, but most of the WMD's Saddam had came from Russia, or the old Soviet Union, Saddam was armed by the Soviet Union in his war with Iran, all of his equipment was Soviet Arsenal, and do you think we would give him weapons that would end up in Soviet Intelligence Laboratories? If you can post site proof of your allegations please do, this is one big myth that we supplied Saddam with chemical weapons.
     
  15. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    http://www.thememoryhole.org/corp/iraq-suppliers.htm

    Key

    A = nuclear weapon program
    B = biological weapon program
    C = chemical weapon program
    R = rocket program
    K = conventional weapons, military logistics, supplies at the Iraqi Ministry of Defense, and building of military plants



    USA

    1. Honeywell (R, K)

    2. Spectra Physics (K)

    3. Semetex (R)

    4. TI Coating (A, K)

    5. Unisys (A, K)

    6. Sperry Corp. (R, K)

    7. Tektronix (R, A)

    8. Rockwell (K)

    9. Leybold Vacuum Systems (A)

    10. Finnigan-MAT-US (A)

    11. Hewlett-Packard (A, R, K)

    12. Dupont (A)

    13. Eastman Kodak (R)

    14. American Type Culture Collection (B)

    15. Alcolac International (C)

    16. Consarc (A)

    17. Carl Zeiss - U.S (K)

    18. Cerberus (LTD) (A)

    19. Electronic Associates (R)

    20. International Computer Systems (A, R, K)

    21. Bechtel (K)

    22. EZ Logic Data Systems, Inc. (R)

    23. Canberra Industries Inc. (A)

    24. Axel Electronics Inc. (A)

    "In addition to these 24 companies home-based in the USA are 50 subsidiaries of foreign enterprises which conducted their arms business with Iraq from within the US. Also designated as suppliers for Iraq's arms programs (A, B, C & R) are the US Ministries of Defense, Energy, Trade and Agriculture as well as the Lawrence Livermore, Los Alamos and Sandia National Laboratories."
     
  16. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Why wasn't Saddam convicted of using or even possessing WMD's? I guess they didn't have a case.
     
  17. Nickelodeon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,581
    Because when they ask him in court where he got those WMD from.....
     
  18. Baron Max Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,053
    In legal circles, and known to most anyone with a clue, the courts will often go for the sure, the certain conviction instead of the more dicey one that they might not win. Besides, Spider, wasn't death by hanging good enough for you???

    Baron Max
     
  19. Buffalo Roam Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,931
    Interesting, Sam as when I look up the weapons systems that were in Saddams Army and Air Force, the systems were mostly Soviet, Chinese, and French, so where were the American systems, and you quote a blog, quoting a left wing source, (The leftist German daily newspaper Die Tageszeitung ), with a unnamed source? As a unnamed source I can present any facts I want and would be able to find a liberal Paper to publish the most blatant bull shit I could think of. yes it is true that many of these companies did business with Saddam, but can you prove that they were providing chemical weapons, I can provide information that Saddam weapons systems were Soviet, Chinese, and French, and from what I have done already you know that I can do it, Most chemicals need delivery system tailored to the chemicals that are delivered, to use them effectively, Saddam used soviet delivery system, so for the best results he would need to use Soviet Chemicals.

    ps: Left wing in Germany usually mean Communist.
     
  20. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    No, Baron it was not. We invaded for WMD's, the least that we could expect is a court case where all the information on that subject was finally made clear. In fact, this trial could have happened. Now we might never know what really happened. I can only conclude that this was a deliberate political move.

    Saddam's execution meant there would be no accounting for his other crimes: the destruction of the marshes and the Marsh Arabs in the 1990s, the murder of tens of thousands of Shiites in the aftermath of the 1991 uprising, the killing of 8,000 members of the Barzani clan in 1983, the 1990 invasion of Kuwait, and the murder of tens of thousands in various purges over his decades in power.

    Obviously, it was never practical to try Saddam Hussein for every crime he committed. But the rush to execution actually interrupted Saddam's ongoing trial on genocide charges in connection with the 1987-1988 Anfal campaign against Iraq's Kurdish minority. That trial was scheduled to resume January 8 and would have concluded in a matter of months.
     
  21. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Have you heard of punctuation? paragraphs?

    Blah blah blah.
    http://www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/arming_iraq.php


    And lastly
    http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/unmovic/2003/1210wmd.htm
    I wonder why?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  22. Buffalo Roam Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,931
    spidergoat, I would think from all your post that it was Saddams right a the supreme leader in Iraq, that it was his right to kill all of these people, and from what I read the U.S. was actually trying to have the execution delayed so that the Information would come out in the trial, interesting thought, isn't it, it was the Iraqi's who demanded that their Court Sentence be carried out, and that the Sentence was affirmed by their Supreme Court as legal, and they set the execution date? Interesting, very interesting.
     
  23. Nickelodeon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,581
    It was the Iraqis right to know the whole truth about that period.
     

Share This Page