Why Is The Moon Not Spinning Then?

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience Archive' started by common_sense_seeker, Sep 6, 2008.

  1. common_sense_seeker Bicho Voador & Bicho Sugador Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,623
    The idea of a supermagnetic effect of solid metallic hydrogen deposited by comets could explain why the Moon is currently shown to be receding from the Earth at around 3.7cm/year.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,397
    Why must one read between the lines? Why not take what is written at face value? You sound like a conspiracy theorist.

    Maybe you're assuming that the the "problem" is more monumental than it really is.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. common_sense_seeker Bicho Voador & Bicho Sugador Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,623
    The latest and final piece of the jigsaw is dark matter comets imo. One must anticipate the fall of Einstein's relativity to appreciate this new angle of enquiry. These anisotropic super-material impacts are the reason for orbital resonance. It would also explain the magnetised lunar rocks and the extra acceleration experienced by the lunar lander which caused it to overshoot it's designated landing site.

    I'm convinced that the moon will eventually start to move towards the Earth in it's orbit, which is the origin of the Pervasive Millennial-Scale Cycle in North Atlantic Holocene and Glacial Climates of 1,470 years. This tidal increase will dramatically affect the climate and push warmer equatorial waters towards the poles. This extra energy will have the effect of stirring up nutrients and bringing them to the surface, creating a wildlife boom.

    I even envisage the warm Pacific current being diverted further north so that it passes over the sill of the Bering Strait into the Arctic basin. This is the origin of the megafauna abundance in the high arctic. It underpins the timing of the Heinrich events, with the tidal surge and change of current flow undercutting the glaciers and the warmer precipitation leading to flow steams under the ice.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    Woo-woo
     
  8. Ophiolite Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,232
    How do they tie in with the Dartmoor hyraxes?
     
  9. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    Must be Genetic Engineering gone wrong.:shrug:
     
  10. common_sense_seeker Bicho Voador & Bicho Sugador Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,623
    Both are two big holes in our understanding as a global species.
     
  11. common_sense_seeker Bicho Voador & Bicho Sugador Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,623
    Check out these photographs of the moon's craters

    The dark comet tidal locking hypothesis would predict a greater number of craters on the side facing the Earth:

    Wikipedia:
    This is in contradiction to the reality of more craters on the far side. This can be explained by the dark matter comets passing through the centre of the Moon and causing lava flows on the other side. These buried dark matter comets and their supermagnetic effects could be attributed to their entry crater to give an internal picture of their size, orientation and location as well as the structure and dynamics of the collision.

    The photos show slightly more north pole dark matter collisions compared to south pole. This is presumably due to our more southerly position in the Milky Way's spiral arm, the dark matter comets being produced from solar metastable metallic hydrogen released during supernova events.
     
    Last edited: Nov 16, 2011
  12. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    This must be a joke!
     
  13. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    Nope. Apparently giant hyraxes migrated from mercury to earth via dark matter comets.

    Course that was when the earth was gigantic.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  14. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    So, logically speaking, we should also find giant hyrax remains on the Moon when they crashed there causing the craters. Probably buried in the lava.
    (OMG! What if some of them survived and started a civilisation? Do you think technology-using giant hyraces are responsible for the anomalous "structures" seen on the Moon? And UFO stories? What if they're.... watching us right now?)

    Maybe there were laxer standards in those days for achieving your PDMCPL*.


    * Private Dark Matter Comet Pilot's Licence.
     
  15. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    Any that landed on the moon turned to cheese - there's no atmosphere up there - silly.:shrug:

    PS: Maybe it was "turned to custard".
     
    Last edited: Nov 16, 2011
  16. common_sense_seeker Bicho Voador & Bicho Sugador Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,623
    lol. The Earth has more landmasses in the northern hemisphere which fits with the dark matter comet origins of our continents and also suggests they were made at different times in the distant past. This has huge implications for the dating of rocks and fossils for example.
     
  17. phlogistician Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,342
    Er, why? What is the significance of the northern hemisphere? Space has no orientation.
     
  18. common_sense_seeker Bicho Voador & Bicho Sugador Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,623
    It does have orientation w.r.t. comet impact directions. The Moon and Earth show that there's more comet impact events which originate from the northern regions of the cosmos. (Which I remember from my astronomy class)
     
  19. Ophiolite Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,232
    Citation please.
     
  20. phlogistician Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,342
    The 'cosmos' does not have a 'northern region', Space has no orientation.
     
  21. phlogistician Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,342

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    So, CSS is trying to say there's a statistical variation in the number of bodies in the 'northern' part of the Oort cloud is he? When they are in ORBIT? Er, how does that work, CSS?
     
  22. common_sense_seeker Bicho Voador & Bicho Sugador Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,623
    There *is* a discrepency in the north/south distribution of craters in the solar sytem bodies:

    I might have got it the wrong way round, but there *is* a marked difference.

    Edit - of course, more southerly impacts of dark matter comets which create magma plumes on the northern hemisphere of the Earth, which created the majority of the landmasses!
     
  23. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    That map appears to be inaccurate Phlog.
    The hyraces aren't mentioned...
    (Maybe it's out of date).
     

Share This Page