Star Wars vs Star Trek

even though the death star was meant to be a TERROR WEAPON not a frontline ship.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

a weapon that is able to destroy a world is useful in that respect they won't rebel they'll be destroyed if they speak out or so they think.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

There are a lot of writers that are fans on Heinlein and Starship Troopers. There are a lot that are fans of Charles Dickens and Shakespear .etc What does it prove?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

*chuckles*

You take all your evidence from that site... why don't you try doing the research yourself instead of listening to Internet Oprah, mmkay?

SD.net is a load of bollocks, plain and simple. I have seen their "calculations" proven wrong more times than I've seen my wife NAKED, and we have sex damn near every day, if not more often than that.

Make of that what you will...

 

Yet your beloved Empire does this...

So which is right, hmm? The Empire, of the IoM?

or are you just wrong again?

 

If they were as similar as you said... why hasn't a lawsuit been filed yet?

*ponders*

Oh, because you're WRONG.

 

OOOH! OOH! I KNOW THIS ONE!

It proves that people can be influenced by works that they LIKE, without having their works be COPIES of the things they like!

 

Really? If a fleet could pour out 100 Nova Cannon shots (you know, that gun that doesn't just destroy warships in one shot), then it is conventional.

 

I would love you to disprove without your belief that ANYTHING from SDN is wrong (considering they actually know a little more about math than that lying shit RSA)

 

Reading comprehension failure.

The Imperium which is a fucking Empire, because the "Empire" is called the GALACTIC EMPIRE.

Like the times Rama has proved you wrong?

 

1) What did you just say? Let me be specific:

"... to disprove without your belief that anything from SDN is wrong..." disprove that SDN is wrong? So you're agreeing with me then that SDN is full of shit? Cool!

2) RSA's math is pretty sound, even if you don't like it. Some of his examples may be... cherry picked... but in general, the math itself is good.

3) I haven't quoted RSA in a good while... so yeah.

 

Warhammer is inspired by Dune and the Foundation trilogy, of course, they alter their universe a bit to not be a ripoff. Starcraft has no fucking respect for other universes and just copies and pastes and changes the name a little.

 

oh yeah they know somehting wikepedia is wrong most of the time and can't be trusted yet they have SOME things right.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

What times Rama has proven me wrong? And about what? You have a deep desire to use fallacious reasoning, don't you... how about some proof? Or can't you provide that?

 

Uhm, that's called "Copyright Infringement" and generally gets companies, you know, shut down...

Obviously Blizzard isn't doing this, as they are still, you know, running...not to mention not a single lawsuit for this has been filed?

I think you just found yourself backed into a corner and are trying to weasel your way out of it again.

 

then why hasn't warhammer done somehting by now?

 

No, that was a mistake, you will prove how SDN is full of shit, considering they use math, something you didn't like at SB.

Yet his bullshit claims that SW humans have natural metal spines, the DS beam was a chain reaction with a yield of 25 gigatons, and that novels are canon?

Since when have I quoted Wong in any time this quarter of the year? I have used numbers from people a lot smarter than you. You think that "ooh they don't agree Star Trek beat Star Wars they're fanboys" and that "any calc for any universe" is wrong.

 

Wong = SD.net in many, many ways. So... you quoted Wong just a few minutes ago

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

I've heard that the Starcraft ending credits say that they thank GW for not suing them, could be wrong.