A****** is a bad word?

Discussion in 'Religion Archives' started by S.A.M., Dec 21, 2007.

  1. Cris In search of Immortality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,199
    sam,

    I hope you can see the difference between a belief (a conviction that something is true) and an endeavor to achieve something worthwhile where we are unsure if it can be done.

    Most scientists and technologists on the leading edge of new innovations operate in this arena of attempting to achieve new things where they are uncertain that it can be done. These are not the actions born of baseless beliefs of certainty as we see with religion but are based on knowledge (often incomplete), ideas, imagination, and concepts, where we see potential possibilities.

    And the concept is mind uploading where the idea is that if we can digitize the neural patterns of a human brain and transfer that into a processing mechanism that can replicate brain function then that person could persist in a more durable medium rather than stay in the fragile realm of biology. I don't know if it can be done yet. In my lab I only have a 256 processor system and I will need several thousand and of much greater power before we can begin to consider the concept achievable.

    I have no delusion that I know it can be done, just a hope that it might be possible.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    So you do believe that a mind can be downloaded into a computer.

    I am a skeptic in that

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Cris In search of Immortality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,199
    sam,

    No, it is an hypothesis; a tentative assumption made in order to draw out and test its logical or empirical consequences.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Ah so you don't believe it. Sorry.
     
  8. Cris In search of Immortality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,199
    sam,

    Do you think that a hypothesis is a statement of belief or unbelief then? I'd hope not. The question of belief is not an issue. How would you define the process of seeking while retaining a position of neutrality regarding the issue of belief/unbelief? One does not have to believe or disbelieve something in order to pursue a line of enquiry.
     
  9. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    I'm not the one who linked a****** to skepticism

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Personally I do not believe that belief and empiricism are interchangeable
     
  10. Cris In search of Immortality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,199
    Sam,

    But I didn't, I linked it to your OP "What is the politically correct term for those who do not believe in God?"

    The term a***** is the issue in dispute and which has an ambiguous meaning.

    An opinion which is pretty much irrelevant if the final product actually functions. A condition that cannot be applied to the supernatural where nothing can be shown as real, true, or functional.
     
  11. lightgigantic Banned Banned

    Messages:
    16,330
    sure - I even crack a few jokes about football and golf
    but I wouldn't say I dedicate any vast (or even partial) reservoirs of time or energy in illuminating others on the facts of football or golf
    :shrug:
     
  12. lightgigantic Banned Banned

    Messages:
    16,330
    Sarkus

    I think you should back track to greenberg's offerings of "atheist", "ex-theist" and "theist"
     
  13. lightgigantic Banned Banned

    Messages:
    16,330
    what do you offer as a model for ascertaining how something is real, true or functional?
    Frequently we hear the charge that theism is false/delusional.
    Rarely do we hear of such persons offering a model for discerning something real/truthful that is complete.
     
  14. superluminal I am MalcomR Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,876
    non-believer
     
  15. SnakeLord snakeystew.com Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,758
    Ok, so you crack some jokes about certain sports. Why are you reflecting what you do on everyone else? I can assure you there are many many people here that almost constantly talk about football while not being football players. There are also many many people that love talking about golf without being golf players.

    Once again I am forced to ask you to desist with such naive foolishness.
     
  16. Cris In search of Immortality Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,199
    lg,

    Practical influence.

    If you can't show that something exerts an influence in the world then the question of whether it exists or not is largely irrelevant.

    Simply put -

    (1) if you believe a god exists then show something that it does or has done that cannot have an alternative explanation.

    (2) if you believe souls exists then show something that they do or have done that cannot have alternative explanations.

    This approach is based on the premise that any effect can only ever have a single unique cause.
     
  17. lightgigantic Banned Banned

    Messages:
    16,330
    its not so much about being/not being a practitioner
    Its about how much one dedicates to it

    for instance if I asserted that I held no interest in golf yet spent 50% of my online time telling others on golf forums about it, its clear I am a hypocrite.

    In the same way, the more that you try and drive home that you have an absence of belief about god on religious forums, the more you are asserting your faith

    This seems to be a primary difference between your experience as an atheist and my experience as an atheist

    :shrug:
     
  18. lightgigantic Banned Banned

    Messages:
    16,330
    check out the pseudoscience threads if you are after alternative explanations ....

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    if reality can be determined by one's ability to produce alternative explanations we are in grave difficulty
     
  19. SnakeLord snakeystew.com Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,758
    Ok that's not a problem but then... I don't see one person here espousing that they have no interest in the subject matter. Do you? If there are any take it up with them.

    Speaking for myself: I have a very deep interest in mythology and ancient superstition. I have a great interest in looking at why humans believe such things, why humans continue to believe in such superstitions given how far we have come, am very interested in looking at its impact on society and doing my bit to prevent such nonsense, (if it helps I refer merely to the other gods.. the ones you would agree are also nonsense), from being forced upon the young. The list is actually quite extensive so I shall leave it here.

    Not at all - this is a serious error on your part.

    (Note: I dont speak for everyone): I would state that most of us here are actually quite science minded, (this is after all a science forum). Generally speaking when someone makes a claim to something we are not the kind of people that just say "ok" and leave it there. We want to know why, we want to see the evidence, we want answers, we need to question those claims. Saying "yeah whatever" is doing a disservice - to both you and us.

    If you were perhaps a little less religious minded and a little more science minded you would understand this. There is the problem between us. The very core of god belief rests on "yeah ok" and nothing more. That is not how the scientific mind works and so there is instantly a vast bridge between us. We don't say "yeah ok", or in theist words "god did it". That's just not good enough.

    I contend that you never were, (other than in the form of your continual atheism with regards to say Thor etc). Of course I have been an atheist since my birth quite a few decades ago and so yes, there will be differences - but then there are differences between every person be they theist, atheist or golf player. You as a theist differ from every other theist here. Why would you use shrug emoticons with regards to something that is completely normal? We're not the Borg.
     
  20. superluminal I am MalcomR Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,876
    Why would a clearly intelligent person say such a silly thing?
     
  21. lightgigantic Banned Banned

    Messages:
    16,330
    Snakelord
    they do espouse that issues of religion/god do not offer an influencing contribution to their personal lives though ...
    hence trying to redefine your designation as a "non-theist" seems more like a valued ideal than a deserving title

    problems arise when the inquiring mind is curtailed by pre-existing beliefs
    my point is that your position as an atheist is more diametrically opposed to theism than mine was
    this isn't a problem
    what is a problem is when you clamour for a definition of atheism being the non-belief of god, when your (virtual) behavior indicates the exact opposite
    (meaning an anti-belief in god)
     
  22. lightgigantic Banned Banned

    Messages:
    16,330
    superluminal
    if I spent 50% of my recreational online time on golf forums asserting that golf doesn't offer a controlling element in my life, what would that suggest?
     
  23. Michael 歌舞伎 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,285
    "unbeliever" is a loaded term.

    Imagine giving a speach to a group of white supremestis - people who are more than willing to kill for their beleif and refering to people from the middle east as rag-head sand niggers. Then saying "arent-chya proud `O being a rag-headed nigga. What`s the politcal correct word for "sand-nigga"?

    Or refering to homosexuals as fagotts and then saying aren`t you proud of being a fag.


    People disagree with one another and people are naturally xenophobic. It`s part of our evolutionary characterists. An insightful AND good hearted person would NEVER play off peoples inherent biggotted nature.

    If it doesn`t make sense then I suppose all I can say is think on it.

    Michael
     

Share This Page