Star Wars vs Star Trek

Discussion in 'SciFi & Fantasy' started by Pollux V, May 9, 2002.

?

Which universe would win?

  1. Star Trek

    227 vote(s)
    35.5%
  2. Star Wars

    268 vote(s)
    41.9%
  3. Spaceballs

    47 vote(s)
    7.3%
  4. Farscape

    12 vote(s)
    1.9%
  5. Dune

    50 vote(s)
    7.8%
  6. Stargate

    36 vote(s)
    5.6%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. FoolFromHell Photons be Free. Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    421
    I doubt you can accurately hit a target moving circles around you at 25c at distances of atleast 50,000km... With any weapon since SW weapons are turreted and turrets cannot physically move that fast in ANY universe.



    You know what the Picard Maneuver is? It makes you appear in atleast two places at once and it would be literally IMPOSSIBLE to distinguish which is the first one. And, you can easily shoot missiles down... OR! Tractor them and send them back, etc.


    Again, what will you do against Q? He can kill anyone and ANYTHING without even a small thought.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. SkywalkerJedi アスラン・ザラ ( Athrun "Alex" Zala ) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,493
    The hyperdrive is invented long before that, anyways the Infinit Empire can still hold them off, besides when did you every seen them go that far in time?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. FoolFromHell Photons be Free. Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    421
    Only a part of it, eh? Well, they are still supposed to be good... Last I checked, little annoying teddy bears killed them.

    And, trees powered by GRAVITY can destroy an AT-ST...
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. SkywalkerJedi アスラン・ザラ ( Athrun "Alex" Zala ) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,493
    They use missiles.





    They bring in the heavy turbolasers.

    I know he can do anything, but why didn't he use it aginst the borgs?
     
  8. SkywalkerJedi アスラン・ザラ ( Athrun "Alex" Zala ) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,493
    I know that is an embarrsing defeat, that is infact the only embarrsing defeat, the later ones are mostly victory. They were winning before chewbacca stole the AT-ST.
    AT-ST are the most walker ever, the Republic have alot better walkers.
     
  9. SkywalkerJedi アスラン・ザラ ( Athrun "Alex" Zala ) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,493
    AT-ST have no shields. SP-HA, AT-TE, AT-HE have shields, and AT-AT have strong armor.
     
  10. antaran_1979 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,447
    just a single phaser beam, 1.1s in duration
     
  11. antaran_1979 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,447
    maybe, but the last adition here (i don't remember the name) acts as if never watcher 15 min of ST.
     
  12. antaran_1979 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,447
    the only defence against the Piccard manoevre involves FTL detection and shooting at the enemy just as it comes out of warp. SW ships don't apear to have FTL scanning capacity and all their weapons are sub-light.
     
  13. antaran_1979 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,447
    i think AT-PTs are the weakes units.
     
  14. antaran_1979 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,447
    ok lads, here are the caps from RoTJ:

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    a good look of the Empirial strike force. i can count no less then 35 ISDs there + SSD. most ISDs are probably ISD2.
     
  15. Rukqo Registered Member

    Messages:
    16
    I would say that AT-PT and STs both have weaknesses and strengths. But I will say AT-AP are the weakest. (All Terrain Attack Pods.)
     
  16. Rukqo Registered Member

    Messages:
    16
    Not all Star Wars weapons are sub-light. For example, lasers are light speed weapons, i think. There are some hyperspce weapons. Galaxy gun is one of them..
     
  17. antaran_1979 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,447
    a close look at an ISD VS Nebulon B shoot out:

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    if the rear section is 55m tall (for a 300m lenght) the TL bolt is 1.8m wide and 15.7m long. given a cilindrical shape of the bolt this gives use roughly 40 cubic meters of bolt (39.95). this is the third type of bolt opserved in SW, after the ones used in ESB (flack and anti-small ships).
     
  18. Rukqo Registered Member

    Messages:
    16
    Me? :bugeye:
     
  19. antaran_1979 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,447
    c won't do, i think. what was galaxy gun used against?
     
  20. antaran_1979 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,447
  21. Rukqo Registered Member

    Messages:
    16
    Actually

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    It was a superweapon. It fires a hyperspace beam.

    I think it destroys Alliance planets, or could be star systems.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Forgive my special likings to superweapons.
     
  22. antaran_1979 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,447

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!




    given the long range involved it will be a most inacurate assesmnet. the bolt apears 2 pixels tall and 15 pixels long. the tower is some 16 pixels tall from the top of the ridge(without the sensor domes). this makes the bolt 134m long and 18m wide!!! or 34100 cubic meters of bolt size.

    note a single TL bolt from the Calamari cruiser causes critical damage to the ISD, the shields are probably down by this stage of the battle.
     
  23. antaran_1979 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,447
    ah not much use in tactical engagements then. but usefull for bombadements. how did they target it?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page