“ |
Originally Posted by Xgen
MacM,
stop paying attention to Yuriy pathetic lies. He is just a man that cant say "I sorry, I was wrong". From this kind that just cant admit theirs errors. Let him crack his head by himself. If he finds dummies that give him money for his scrap then he have the full right to call himself as he wish.
Anyway, I dont support your behavior too... There is a more civilized ways which educated people use to set their disputes.
|
” |
Thanks for your post. I do hope you understand I do not like what goes on here and regret that it becomes necessary to use these tatics.
But Yuriy has been guilty of falsifying my post by actually altering what has been written in cut and paste operation, then calling me a liar about what he says I said, he routinely interjects my name in vain even if I have not posted in threads and never posts suitable responses to anything I post but instead makes totally false and baseless statements as matters of fact about my knowlege, education, understandings or achievements.
If such conduct is not responded to then it appears to become fact over time.
“ |
I am just interested from what you had say about SRT. I had not followed your forums, can you explain with a few words why and how you had found that " SRT is flawed at it most basic level". Because I too had determined that modern physics offers a totally unstatisfactory explanation of relativity. IIf you make a thread about that, and if your concepts are clear for me, I think that I had a lot to contribute to a different and better theory about relativity. I will participate in such a thread.
|
” |
As to these questions I'm not sure it is really that important as to when and how I have reached my views. But lets just say it has now been over 50 years since I formed my opinions. Prior to that I was very much and advocate of Relativity and idolized Einstien as a youth.
The how was nothing more than realizations of false concepts which became buttressed over the years with verification of predictions which I made based on my new understandings of reality. Something like growing up and stopping to believe in Easter Bunnies, Santa Clause, Tooth Fairies, Angels, etc.
I can certainly say that I have a different view than Relativity (although some things are very simular but with cause not just extrapolations mathematically and rhetoric) but it remains to be seen if it is better.
SRT is severly flawed as advocated but then until much more time and analysis has been done my views may well be equally flawed. But at least I have the good sense to stand by physics supported by a reality and do not waive my right to think for myself in some religious zeal as is the case with SRT.
I know of nothing in my views that reject or violate anything which has been proven or shown likely valid by observation and data in modern science. But there is a great mis-interpretaion of what current data means and how that extrapolates into untested physical principles.
There is tremendous circular logic, lack of logic and just plain unorthodox common sense being advocated today. But the most troubling issue is the failure to acknowledge evidence being found by physical testing which shows the falicy of their views. A refusal to move away from the rhetoric and actually do verification testing.
A perfect example of what I am talking about is the thread
Light Tested - which I started several days ago. It shows 42 hits or readers but has generated "0" replies.
I am now in personal contact with the author and have learned that this testing has been going on since 1999, and has repeatedly, without fail, produced results consistant with having measured an absolute motion of the earth.
It produces data directly in conflict with the foundation of SRT with regard to properties of light. It has been witnessed, recorded by film and yet it is being ignored by the scientific community.
It could be verified or disproven within 24 - 48 hours by off-the-shelf equipment for less that $2,000.00. Isn't it amazing that the scientific community prefers to stick their arrogant thumb in his eye and to continue to spend billions of government on backed projects such as Probe "B" to test Relativity.
Likewise my own gravity testing which cost a few hundred dollars, and admittedly is borderline science because of the quality of the setup, but where months of data clearly suggested that GR is a false concept and that gravity is indeed a phenomena induced into mass by an external energy source and not some property of mass or of curved time-space.
It too could be easily replicated and prove or disprove the claim for the price of a few lunches in Washington D.C., in a matter of days.
I would hope that you might start threads outlining your views so that we might learn as well.
You educate me. You bafoon.
