SEARCHED for WATER THERE, WHERE IT IS NOT PRESENT

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by newphysics, Oct 10, 2009.

  1. newphysics Registered Member

    Messages:
    4

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    SEARCHED for WATER THERE, WHERE IT IS NOT PRESENT

    One of these days NASA have conducted interesting experiment on looking up of water on Moon. The purpose is obvious. If on Moon there is a water, building a habitable space station is possible. At once it is possible to state, that all planets and the satellites of earth group have water, including Moon. Where there is this water? Apparently, that in surface layer it is not present, since the ice will evaporate in conditions of vacuum. As temperature on the day time party hardly reaches positive values, while on the night party reigns awful chill, the selection of areas near to poles is not justified by that there it is more cold. Under a surface of Moon a permafrost, and the surface has such low heat conduction, that fears, that the solar radiation will evaporate water have not the basis. The surface of Moon is entirely ploughed up by meteorites on a no-bottom. At shock of a meteorite a lot of energy is selected, which one evaporates ice and the vapour of water are dispersed in space. At shock of cometary ice clumps for the same reason water does not remain on a surface. Therefore explosion inside any crater with the purpose of detection of water in raised dust is useless. Apparently, that it is necessary to search for water under the layer, ploughed up by meteorites, of a ground. It will be relict ice formed during volcanic activity on Moon at condensation of vapors of water, raised from depthes.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    well guess what water ice is present on the moon and the recent Indian Chandarayaan I satellite showed water is there. In addition to that your claims (that raising dust and particles of possible frozen water above moon as a result of a collision of a probe just before LCROSS analyzed itt and crashed itself) are foolish.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Tiassa Let us not launch the boat ... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    37,883
    (Insert Title Here)

    A couple things worth noting:

    (1) The LCROSS plunge was not a high-temperature "explosion". The impact would not destroy all the water NASA expected to find.

    (2) LCROSS was not searching for subterranean water. The theory of how water molecules are generated on the moon only operates about a millimeter deep.​

    There are plenty of concerns about how LCROSS might bring a negative result, but you missed every one of them.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.

Share This Page