07-04-09, 01:24 AM #1
Man-made nuclear bomb: one best evidence of Big Bang
Man-made nuclear bomb: ONE best evidence of Big Bang.
(In 1964, radio astronomers Amo Penzias and Robert Wilson detected cosmic
microwave background radiation covering entire outer space, believed remnant of Big Bang, below another d iscovery appears exceptionally good)
Atom is 99.999999999999% space., meaning its components, re-electrons, protons, neutrons, quarks, are all that spacious. If atom is the size of 20 basketballs rolled into one, the size of its nucleus is like a grain of sand, and if the size of the nucleus is 20 basketballs rolled into one, the size of the innermost quark is like a grain of sand. From such hollow nucleus, particularly, its innermost hollow quarks, originates the mind-boggling nuclear bomb explosion, unbelievable several million times greater than conventional bomb. Such nuclear bomb release uncannily is similar to the first and biggest nuclear explosion of all time, the Big Bang. Big Bang originated from incredible proton-size ( roughly, size 10-18 meters or miles?, but, naturally, no one knows) that exploded into the biggest nuclear explosion of all time and made up the whole universe, re- the stars, planets, galaxies. Two formidable evidences support Big Bang , re-. the detected CMBR or comic microwave background radiation all over outer space, and the red-shifting of all galaxies, indicating expansion of the universe.. There is now another evidence, right here on earth, before our very eyes . The man-made nuclear bomb explosion, fusion or fission, is uncanny a likeness, a reminder, of the mother Big Bang.. Where does such unconceivable point mass of nucleus (.mass of .000000000001%, more or less, of total area of nucleus) get its mind-boggling energy release? Nuclear release is E=MC2 but how and why such incredible micro-micro point mass of nucleus (pre-Designed) account for massive destructions unless it is like Big Bang.. As a matter of fact, all nuclear explosions/generations, re- supernova explosion, meteor nuclear collision, nuclear generating plant, nuclear generated sun, stars, all nuclears inherent of Big Bang, in keeping with law of conservation that nothing is lost nor destroyed.
From proton-sized mass, Big Bang incredibly exploded and made up the total matters of the universe, such Big Bang expanded by itself, inflating by itself, infinitely, yet nothing added, nothing reduced, than its original proton-size... Like Big Bang, from a 99.999999999999% vacuum atom, a modern nuclear bomb, with gross weight of a THOUSAND kilograms can produce a mind-boggling BILLION kilograms of conventional explosive, the nuclear release expands by itself, inflates by itself, unlimitedly, nothing added, nothing reduced, than its net weight.. Man-made nuclear bomb is the best evidence that nuclear Big Bang did occur... .
Why man-made nuclear bomb is best evidence?: As we see, before our very eyes, how man-made nuclear bomb is, before and after explosion, …. we are seeing, too,, the making of nuclear Big Bang, before and after.
Jose s. Aldea
Chairman – Capiz Scientists & Inventors Society
Philippine Copyright 2009
By: jose s. aldea
Cc: DOST, CSIS
07-04-09, 03:01 AM #2
I se one problem with this hypothesis.
Where is all the matter?
If all matter came from big bang and bom is like big bang where is all the matter that should be in japan?
07-04-09, 03:28 AM #3
Matter could better be described as 100% space. Elementary particles like electrons and quarks are theoretically point-particles, unless you go to string theory. But one-dimensional particles in that case are still zero in volume. Matter is a collection of forces, and in no way solid at the quantum level. It only seems solid at the macro level because of the electrical repulsion between atoms. I'm digressing a little. A fusion bomb releases only .7% of its mass as energy, the rest adjusting to the new nuclear binding force required to hold helium atoms together. The Big Bang, however, is merely an expansion of space, not a release of energy. The energy that existed can not in itself expand space, but another form of energy must be taken into account: vaccuum energy that represents negative pressure, having an anti-gravitational effect on space itself, expanding it. The smaller the universe, the sharper the curvature of space-time, resulting in greater vaccuum energy. It's impossible to know the curvature of space-time not knowing the true size of the universe, but a smaller universe implies a greater curvature. Point is, energy can phase change to various forms under different conditions, and there must have been many of those. Energy itself might be seen as differences between various phases, such as the difference between matter and space, and how they can change places under certain conditions. Straighter to the point, I would say that energy, therefore matter, is just a fluctuation in the curvature of space-time itself.
Last edited by Nucleon; 07-04-09 at 03:37 AM.
07-04-09, 06:43 AM #4
Dang. You found this site, too.
To jsaldea12: Please find another site to pollute.
To everyone else: Google jsaldea12.
Thread moved to the cesspool.
07-04-09, 06:49 AM #5
The name itself tells: it is BIG BANG, meaning explosion, The presence of CMBR BLACKBODY radiation, accompanied with the faint hissing sound and faint glow, all over outer space it was explosion, nuclear explosion, the biggest, a combination of fission/fusion nuclear explosion. Nothing is destroyed nor lost, law of conservation, The present nuclear explosions/generations, re-man-made nuclear bomb, exploding supernova, nuclear plant, the sun, itself, inside, stars etc. all attest that it was nuclear explosion, for WHERE ELSE would all these stated nuclears came from if not from its source, the Big Bang., again law of conservation that form/symmetry changes but basic substance return/remain the same. Is there any evidence of inflation taken place in our universe.? None but nuclears…all over the universe…reminders of the primary happening, the Big Bang.
Big Bang, actually, expanded itself in space that was COLD , almost absolute zero, that already existed, Regards.
07-04-09, 06:14 PM #6
Hi. Please consider this article an honest-to-goodness search for scientific truth. Does not mean that because because majority say it, it is the truth. Evidences are there, especially, the BLACKBODY RADIATION, the strongest evidence that Big Bang was a nuclear explosiom. Inflation cannot create remnants of SMOKE blackbody radiation.
07-06-09, 09:41 AM #7
(Where has delete gone?????)
Last edited by Captain Kremmen; 07-07-09 at 01:32 AM.
07-06-09, 09:46 AM #8
Didn't you post on the advancedphysicsforum site, where you were
Last edited by Captain Kremmen; 07-07-09 at 01:34 AM.
By Someone in forum World EventsLast Post: 09-14-10, 04:32 PMReplies: 57
By cactusneedles in forum The CesspoolLast Post: 09-28-09, 01:31 PMReplies: 149
By Reiku in forum Physics & MathLast Post: 03-05-08, 09:23 PMReplies: 1
By Buffalo Roam in forum World EventsLast Post: 01-19-07, 02:04 PMReplies: 139
By Iasion in forum Religion ArchivesLast Post: 12-26-06, 09:31 PMReplies: 59