-
06-08-09, 04:27 PM #21
-
06-08-09, 04:29 PM #22
-
06-08-09, 04:31 PM #23
-
06-08-09, 04:32 PM #24
-
06-08-09, 04:36 PM #25
Alright, and what about young mothers with children, wanting more children? Where taxpayers would be paying for the upbringing of the child? Would you feel that it is in everyone's best interest for the young mother to proceed with getting a tubal ligation? Should she be refused the procedure?
-
06-08-09, 04:38 PM #26
That is up to the taxpayers or the government to decide.
My task is to make sure babies are born.
No babies are born? bad.
One baby is born? Good.
More than one baby is born? Better.
Too many babies are born? No such thing.
Unhealthy babies are born? BAD! So as long as those young mothers give birth to healthy children, let them use the tax money, I support the cause!
-
06-08-09, 04:39 PM #27
-
06-08-09, 04:42 PM #28
Yeah ok, they are not femi-nazis...but they are not doing the task given to them by life either.
We have space to explore, it is limitless! We need every chance we have to maximize our civilization in numbers and strength. We need to explore space for resources and allow the future generations to be driven by the need of resources and thus evolve as a civilization in a whole.
-
06-08-09, 04:44 PM #29
It's quality, not quantity. A woman is not just a baby-making machine. What about female astronauts?
-
06-08-09, 04:45 PM #30
-
06-08-09, 04:47 PM #31
Well, not having a child could be their choice in order to pursue a career in space travel.
-
06-08-09, 04:48 PM #32
-
06-08-09, 04:52 PM #33
-
06-08-09, 04:53 PM #34
-
06-08-09, 04:54 PM #35
oh childless by nature...well I think that they are not performing their task because life did not give them the task, thus they are not obliged to perform a task.
-
06-08-09, 05:02 PM #36
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/PRESSROOM/98facts/sterile.htm
That's your stats... only 25% who've had it done would consider having it reversed. That's not most, that's 1 in 4... 75% wouldn't get it reversed at all. That's not many... that's even slightly more than a few.
Therefore, your statement is false.
-
06-08-09, 05:05 PM #37
-
06-08-09, 05:06 PM #38
-
06-08-09, 05:07 PM #39
-
06-08-09, 05:07 PM #40
Similar Threads
-
By madanthonywayne in forum Religion ArchivesLast Post: 06-27-09, 09:37 AMReplies: 264
-
By PsychoticEpisode in forum Pseudoscience ArchiveLast Post: 02-14-09, 04:51 PMReplies: 34
-
By Roman in forum Physics & MathLast Post: 02-13-09, 05:45 AMReplies: 20
-
By gluon in forum Pseudoscience ArchiveLast Post: 01-14-09, 02:41 AMReplies: 17
-
By Just Curious in forum Religion ArchivesLast Post: 10-24-08, 01:24 PMReplies: 11


Reply With Quote


Bookmarks