05-31-09, 01:44 PM #41
John, when it comes to advising people about drug use, you should leave it to the people who know something about it. Otherwise you're going to kill someone.
THC metabolism is affected by various factors, but we're not discussing that. How you actually get high is a fact. It's not my opinion. It's medical fact. This is not a matter of disagreement. Don't insult the entire medical community by insisting it is.
05-31-09, 02:03 PM #42
how is what i said going to kill someone? you are misconstruing what i said.
How you actually get high is a fact
05-31-09, 02:07 PM #43
You were the one claiming pot and heroin affected the exact same area of the nervous system in the same way, and that it would affect you to smoke a bomber joint just as much as a small line of heroin. That's deadly (not to mention WRONG) information.
05-31-09, 02:11 PM #44
but i didnt mean physically in terms of medical danger. do you think i am stupid? plus i already made that pretty clear.
05-31-09, 02:12 PM #45
Look at what i said previously:
afa grading intoxicants and which substances are more dangerous, my views fall in line with the norm and what can be termed factual information. so really it is just a misunderstanding. i think that the physical danger part of this is what you are missing too or is just a misunderstanding. first time heroin users can be in for a bad surprise...iotw's kicking the bucket.
05-31-09, 02:15 PM #46
Are you writing in disjointed sentence fragments that make it hard to follow what you're saying on purpose?
It physically does not affect you the same way, in terms of danger, in terms of nervous system function, in terms of anything EVER.
Clean cut smack is not that hard on you. It's just highly addictive.
05-31-09, 02:42 PM #47Are you writing in disjointed sentence fragments that make it hard to follow what you're saying on purpose?
OT: slightly two different trains of though here. but even scientists and doctors disagree on the particulars of addiction and various substances.
Last edited by John99; 05-31-09 at 02:48 PM.
05-31-09, 03:00 PM #48
On addiction. Not on how you actually get high. Although most agree: Smack's addictive. I'm not nagging on the sentences; I just genuinely get confused.
05-31-09, 03:21 PM #49
CatherineW.. your welcome in New Mexico too.
John99... you have no clue what you're talking about with
weed and heroin..
have another drink of what ever you've been drinking
05-31-09, 03:28 PM #50
05-31-09, 04:19 PM #51
05-31-09, 04:23 PM #52
05-31-09, 04:24 PM #53
05-31-09, 04:27 PM #54
05-31-09, 04:29 PM #55
05-31-09, 04:30 PM #56
05-31-09, 04:33 PM #57
a few good hits of very high thc weed (one or two) and that will send a new smoker for a loop that is not really much different from doing a small line of heroin.
guess this is what got me thinking they were both from you
my apologizes for mis-quoting you
05-31-09, 04:38 PM #58
so what is wrong with that statement?
just because that is not one persons experience does not mean that is true for everyone. key differences are that with heroin you most likely puke and it really can kill you.
05-31-09, 04:43 PM #59
most heroin ODs can be prevented..problem is most people don't know what to do or the junkies alone and drowns on their puke... they die from drowning
To die from a heroin overdose takes quite awhile... and like any opiate it's from respiratory failure
to equate heroin and marijuana even close to the same is "reefer madness" dogma
05-31-09, 04:48 PM #60
By slivered roots in forum Pseudoscience ArchiveLast Post: 04-08-09, 06:49 AMReplies: 544
By Xellos in forum Ethics, Morality, & JusticeLast Post: 04-22-06, 10:54 PMReplies: 212