Guys Are Awesome

**laladopi** · 01-14-09, 12:26 AM

Originally Posted by Enmos

I hope, for your sake, that you never wake up.

What is that suppose to mean?

**laladopi** · 01-14-09, 12:30 AM

Originally Posted by cosmictraveler

I just watched my Ex's vagina allot to see how she felt.

Huh?

**~~draqon~~** · 01-14-09, 12:51 AM

Originally Posted by Enmos

Thats certainly sounds gay..

he is retaliating against that thread about "evil masculity"

**~~Tnerb~~** · 01-14-09, 01:09 AM

Originally Posted by draqon

he is retaliating against that thread about "evil masculity"

I already retaliated... This thread was posted before TT's anyway... I feel like I put him to rest.

**jessiej920** · 01-14-09, 01:12 AM

Originally Posted by tnerb

If you were a guy, you wouldn't be disagreeing.
I'm not joking.
Opinion is his eyes are souless because he is a computer generated:
Fact is he is a computer generated and full of male soul.

.

So you are speaking for every man when you say that by staring into the eyes of the computer generated image of the man you presented that they will all be able to see a 'God'? Hmmm. Are you saying women cannot find men God-like? I am a woman, therefore I disagree with you based solely on that? No. I do not find God in the image of the man you presented because I cannot even see his eyes, for one thing, and he is not a living human being that I can connect with. I can stare all day at that image and see no soul, no God. So I disagree. It is hard for me. Sorry. Maybe you are trying to say that he represents what your idea of Godliness is. IDK. If that is your opinion that is fine, but I still disagree.

I truly don't understand your original OP and what your use of the images presented proves.

Originally Posted by tnerb

But look into a guys eyes. Try to show him how you feel. Imagine that this guy is God.

What if were one to look into a Girls eyes and do the same thing?
IDK,
BUT, I cannot imagine something so great as a guy.

What I gather from this is that you find it easier to see God in the eyes of men? Your post isn't really that clear. You say that you cannot imagine something so great as a guy. You then give us an image of a very beautiful woman, but don't make it clear if you see God in her eyes or not. You say you like her, but don't really make clear her role. What does she represent to you? Then you say...

Originally Posted by tnerb

The woman in the picture is actually godly from a mans perspective. She is not posed. Any male perspective would consider this female as the same higherarchy (is that a word?) as the picture above- representing the soul of a woman.....

So now you are saying that you can find God in the image of the woman? Again you are assuming that all men would find the image of this women Godly, but from what I understood in the original OP, when you were comparing pictures, you were saying that the image of the woman did not hold the same Godliness as the image of the man. Or at least it wasn't as easy to find. And why would the images you presented strictly represent the soul of every man and every woman? The pictures you chose are so glaringly different that it seems very biased. Not every girl looks like that and not every man looks like that. When you say it is not hard to find God in the image of the man you posted, it seems you are saying that your image of God is imposing, warrior-like, masculine etc. The image of the woman you posted does not seem to represent any of those things, so how can one stare into their eyes and fairly and unbiasedly judge the differences in sense of Godliness you think is so obviously present?

Originally Posted by tnerb

What things are in the way?

And the answer to your question is to come up with one..

See above.

Originally Posted by tnerb

Well actually yours is far more biased.. thx for agreeing.

Actually no. You said stare into the eyes of the images you posted. There, it seems, is where you think one can imagine and find God. The pictures I chose were both living humans, captured in the moment, who's eyes are staring straight back at the viewer. If God is found in the eyes, then the rest does not matter and the pictures I posted were very similar in that the focus is on the eyes, the passion or 'soul' or 'God' within them, while the pictures you posted represented very distinct images of people, the eyes being only a small portion of their image.

Oh and a P.S. for you:

Just randomly wondering, are you male or female, because I just noticed that you had a piece by Jessica Galbreth posted as your Avatar. She's one of my favorite artists. Just a curious choice if you are a dude. Not many guys I know are into faeries.

**electrafixtion** · 01-14-09, 06:43 AM

Originally Posted by jessiej920

So you are speaking for every man when you say that by staring into the eyes of the computer generated image of the man you presented that they will all be able to see a 'God'? Hmmm. Are you saying women cannot find men God-like? I am a woman, therefore I disagree with you based solely on that? No. I do not find God in the image of the man you presented because I cannot even see his eyes, for one thing, and he is not a living human being that I can connect with. I can stare all day at that image and see no soul, no God. So I disagree. It is hard for me. Sorry. Maybe you are trying to say that he represents what your idea of Godliness is. IDK. If that is your opinion that is fine, but I still disagree.

I truly don't understand your original OP and what your use of the images presented proves.

What I gather from this is that you find it easier to see God in the eyes of men? Your post isn't really that clear. You say that you cannot imagine something so great as a guy. You then give us an image of a very beautiful woman, but don't make it clear if you see God in her eyes or not. You say you like her, but don't really make clear her role. What does she represent to you? Then you say...

So now you are saying that you can find God in the image of the woman? Again you are assuming that all men would find the image of this women Godly, but from what I understood in the original OP, when you were comparing pictures, you were saying that the image of the woman did not hold the same Godliness as the image of the man. Or at least it wasn't as easy to find. And why would the images you presented strictly represent the soul of every man and every woman? The pictures you chose are so glaringly different that it seems very biased. Not every girl looks like that and not every man looks like that. When you say it is not hard to find God in the image of the man you posted, it seems you are saying that your image of God is imposing, warrior-like, masculine etc. The image of the woman you posted does not seem to represent any of those things, so how can one stare into their eyes and fairly and unbiasedly judge the differences in sense of Godliness you think is so obviously present?

See above.

Actually no. You said stare into the eyes of the images you posted. There, it seems, is where you think one can imagine and find God. The pictures I chose were both living humans, captured in the moment, who's eyes are staring straight back at the viewer. If God is found in the eyes, then the rest does not matter and the pictures I posted were very similar in that the focus is on the eyes, the passion or 'soul' or 'God' within them, while the pictures you posted represented very distinct images of people, the eyes being only a small portion of their image.

Oh and a P.S. for you:

Just randomly wondering, are you male or female, because I just noticed that you had a piece by Jessica Galbreth posted as your Avatar. She's one of my favorite artists. Just a curious choice if you are a dude. Not many guys I know are into faeries.

I don't think the thread honestly bears much weight. I tried to get (it's a him I believe) to expound or elucidate and was just blown off. (hopefully no pun intended)

**jessiej920** · 01-14-09, 12:03 PM

Originally Posted by electrafixtion

I don't think the thread honestly bears much weight. I tried to get (it's a him I believe) to expound or elucidate and was just blown off. (hopefully no pun intended)

Lol! Damn and I finally sat down and took the time to quote everything and answer in a calm and thoughtful way. Oh well.

**Cellar_Door** · 01-14-09, 12:40 PM

This thread is unbelievably stupid, plus I think you have a worrying obsession with that cartoon character who you have previously describe as your 'role model/idol'.
Anyway, men vary hugely. There may be a gifted few who have this 'godlike' quality you describe, but there will always be just as many, if not more, who are pretty much dead behind the eyes.

**~~Tnerb~~** · 01-19-09, 11:11 PM

Originally Posted by Cellar_Door

This thread is unbelievably stupid, plus I think you have a worrying obsession with that cartoon character who you have previously describe as your 'role model/idol'.
Anyway, men vary hugely. There may be a gifted few who have this 'godlike' quality you describe, but there will always be just as many, if not more, who are pretty much dead behind the eyes.

I agree. Take your whole quote and shove it up your ass.

**~~draqon~~** · 01-19-09, 11:19 PM

Originally Posted by Cellar_Door

This thread is unbelievably stupid, plus I think you have a worrying obsession with that cartoon character who you have previously describe as your 'role model/idol'.
Anyway, men vary hugely. There may be a gifted few who have this 'godlike' quality you describe, but there will always be just as many, if not more, who are pretty much dead behind the eyes.

The O.P is worrying about equality of how men and women are viewed. That is all.

**Balerion** · 01-20-09, 11:59 PM

Tnerb,

I have to say in regard to your original post...it does sound a little gay. And I don't mean that as an insult. What I mean by that is you have just described getting lost in a man's eyes, while also admitting that you have never had that experience with a woman. Now, aside from the fact that you attempted to demonstrate this by providing us a picture of a computer-generated video game character for the male, and a drop-dead hottie for the female, I honestly can say that I have never been lost in a man's eyes.

A female's, however...yes, I have found great depth there.

I think this is something you should consider, Tnerb. There may be a side of you you're not willing to face. It certainly sounds that way.

**Ladicius** · 01-27-09, 06:26 PM

[QUOTE=tnerb;2139376]A picture of a guy, for example, a picture of this guy.

Stare into his eyes for a long period of time. Consider that he is God, in actuality, he is some form of existence which you will be able to consider as God (this is not as absurd as you take it to be).

Heeey it's seph.

**~~Tnerb~~** · 01-27-09, 07:00 PM

Yeah it's seph and jdawg doesn't like the fact that I don't like to be flirted with so ...... whatever.

**tim840** · 01-27-09, 07:58 PM

hmm... well i do not find the people in either picture attractive, but I will say that for me the opposite of what tnerb said is true. girls' eyes are deeper andm ore beautiful imo ( one girl's in particular xP )

**PsychoticEpisode** · 01-27-09, 08:12 PM

Hey CT, remember that National Geographic cover with the Afghan girl's face? Think you can dig that one up and post it. Most powerful set of peepers I ever saw.

Guy's eyes has a nice rhythmic cadence to it doesn't it? I think Tnerb or Brent, the guy in the mirror, enjoys gazing at himself. Our modern day Narcissus has a problem, NPD, and needs to see a shrink.

**~~Tnerb~~** · 01-27-09, 09:41 PM

I'm no narcassist. You may be though

Anyway, if every time I come back to this thread I see a cut down or some such, I am closing this thread.

So make the best of it. If you can't see God in a guys eyes, or you would like to argue the point because you are a moron, feel fucking free.

On the other hand if you would like to watch how rediculious you and hte other sciforum members are go ahead. This thread is pure mockery of sciforums, first class.

**madanthonywayne** · 01-28-09, 11:59 PM

Originally Posted by tnerb

This is not intended as a one sided dealeo, here guys.

But look into a guys eyes. Try to show him how you feel. Imagine that this guy is God.

What if were one to look into a Girls eyes and do the same thing?
IDK,
BUT, I cannot imagine something so great as a guy.
I am not bi or gay, I just cannot fathom the depths of other than what I have presented above.
Anyone feel similar about this in that regard, or perhaps there is some art to the man which knowledge you understand....

If you're saying can you imagine God as a woman, I agree. Focus on the voice. I'd can't imagine God having some high pitched female voice. It just wouldn't command the respect (imagine any woman's voice saying, "I am the Lord, your God", it just doesn't fly). God's voice has to be a powerful, deep, male voice.

On the other hand, I did see a movie that portrayed God's voice as a combination of male/female and that came across as believable to me. But I definitely can't imagine a female voice alone.

**visceral_instinct** · 01-29-09, 05:27 PM

Originally Posted by tnerb

A picture of a guy, for example, a picture of this guy.

Stare into his eyes for a long period of time. Consider that he is God, in actuality, he is some form of existence which you will be able to consider as God (this is not as absurd as you take it to be).

Next, there is a girl. Try it!

Keep in mind, that girl likes me and I like her, and are by no means Gay.

That doesn't look like a man, it looks like a girl with overdeveloped deltoids.

If it is a guy, his face is way too estrogenized. Men aren't supposed to have a heart shaped face.

**Carcano** · 01-29-09, 05:50 PM

Originally Posted by madanthonywayne

I'd can't imagine God having some high pitched female voice. It just wouldn't command the respect (imagine any woman's voice saying, "I am the Lord, your God", it just doesn't fly). God's voice has to be a powerful, deep, male voice.

How bout a wise ass old geezer:

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=Ap46wThyBnA