12-09-08, 07:33 PM #1
Is there a "best" language?
Are there a set of criteria we could use to determine which language is the "best"?
Or are all languages equal?
- Many of my Japanese and Persian friends say they like to speak in English (even to other Japanese or Iranians) because it allows them to express ideas they either don't have or say things more directly that simply isn't possible in their native languages.
- Of course I have also been told Arabic is the "perfect" language - the criteria, that's what the Qur'an is written in so it must be.
- I've been told Old English is the Lords language (and thus also Perfect) because that's what the KJV of the Bible was written in!
- I read once that 100 years ago Japanese and Chinese tried to get rid of their characters because they thought this may have been holding them back socially and developmentally, but the problem was they can read information just sooo much faster using them, without them they read comparably slower and so they had to keep them.
So, this all got me to thinking, is there a "best" language? Is it possible to rank languages? Perhaps by number of words? Perhaps by number of sounds, or in the case of Japanese by have a space for a lack of sound? How they are written?
I read there's a group of people in south E Africa that speak tonally + still use clicking noses, presumably a remnant from before we evolved vocal cords! Is theirs a MORE or LESS or NEITHER evolved language?
Do linguists ever attempt such endeavors? Are some languages more evolved than others?
Last edited by Michael; 12-09-08 at 08:39 PM.
12-09-08, 07:35 PM #2Are there a set of criteria we could use to determine which language is the "best"?
12-09-08, 07:39 PM #3
I'm no expert, but I really like the English language. It is a very flexible and expressive language, which means its difficult to learn, but good for communicating with. The language has such a huge vocabulary, and can be manipulated easily to produce a variety of meanings and feelings. There are words for anything you could want to say.
I havent got a lot of experience with many languages - Im monolingual and learning Chinese - but Id say English is a pretty good language. (Also, you can invent words if you dont know how to say something and people will still know what you mean)
12-09-08, 07:48 PM #4
I'd think there's no real best language but only one that could be more useful and easily understood to everyone.
12-09-08, 08:48 PM #5
12-09-08, 09:03 PM #6
All human languages have a large amount of redundancy. For example, consider:
"Yu cn ndrstnd ths evn tho it lcks mny vwls."
So, having fewer sounds or words is unlikely to make a language "better". We like a certain amount of redundancy, so that if we miss the meaning the first time we can still probably pick it up later on.
12-09-08, 09:39 PM #7
That has nothing to do with spoken language.
12-09-08, 11:10 PM #8
Is it possible to ask the question: Which is the BEST language and objectively answer it? Why do people think it's wrong to ask? Maybe it depends on which aspect.
- Perhaps Chinese can impart information the fastest.
- Perhaps English in the most prevalent.
Some languages may be superior in some aspects while others in others.
Think about this, is it normal to ask this question: Which computer language is the best to program in?
See the point?
12-09-08, 11:46 PM #9
There is no such thing as a "best" programming language although you could definitely make the argument that a given language was 'best' for a given application.
You can't really say that about human languages, I doubt most people would be capable of switching languages repeatedly mid conversation whenever the topic of discussion shifted.
12-10-08, 12:11 AM #10
12-10-08, 12:34 AM #11
Random story that relates to this:
I have heard that in Belgium (and other multilingual countries) it is relatively common practice for people to have a conversation between 2 people that are speaking two different languages, i.e, each speaks their native tongue which the other understands but is not as competent at speaking.
12-10-08, 02:25 AM #12
of course, I don't think there's a perfect language or a "best" language - it's just something I often here from certain types of people.
12-10-08, 03:50 AM #13
Best? Imo, Japanese. For example:
年. 月. 日 = Year. Month. Date
１直 = 1st shift (working shift)
水洗 = water rinse
担当 = person in charge
Very efficient, or?
12-10-08, 04:06 AM #14
Something that I made few years ago:
*** 4th Year Annual Schedule of Engineering Control Department:
(*** = company's name)
技術管理 = engineering control/management
12-10-08, 04:09 AM #15
That very short text means: Civil drawing (図 = drawing/figure)
12-10-08, 04:35 AM #16
I think the best language for a community is their own (otherwise they'd be speaking another one).
Anyway, as a non-native English speaker, I believe its flexibility helped it to become a lingua franca (perhaps Latin also had that feature, so it became the dominant language at its time - appart from the Roman Empire power etc.)
So, I wouldn't say "best" language, but languages that are more practical than others in some aspects.
12-10-08, 04:58 AM #17
I have to say, that is true as well. My mother tongue (Indonesian) is the simplest language I've ever known (other language that I've learn is Sundanese, English, German, Spanish, French, Japanese, and now just starting to learn Arabic).
In Indonesian, unlike in some other languages, there is no tenses, no singular/plural rule, no article (like the, a, an), to mention few. For example:
1. I am going to go to schoolIn Indonesian:
2. Yesterday I went to school
3. Tomorrow I will go to school
1. Saya pergi ke sekolah
2. Kemarin saya pergi ke sekolah
3. Besok saya akan pergi ke sekolah
The verb (pergi = go) remains pergi.
1. I have one car
2. She has one car
1. Saya punya satu mobil
2. Dia punya satu mobil
1. I have one car
2. She has two cars
1. Saya punya satu mobil
2. Dia punya dua mobil
In English: I - he - she
In Indonesian: Saya - dia - dia
Very simple, or? I am not sure though, whether simple means best
12-10-08, 05:48 AM #18
English, not because of the language itself but just because its international function.
12-10-08, 06:09 AM #19
12-10-08, 06:10 AM #20
By Dinosaur in forum LinguisticsLast Post: 06-17-09, 10:45 PMReplies: 22
By Cannon in forum LinguisticsLast Post: 07-22-08, 07:07 PMReplies: 3
By greenberg in forum LinguisticsLast Post: 11-24-07, 03:59 PMReplies: 25
By genep in forum LinguisticsLast Post: 06-20-07, 06:35 PMReplies: 1
By genep in forum The CesspoolLast Post: 06-19-07, 05:07 PMReplies: 0