Cosmological math is problematical at best. It and the old school fundamental scientists of today’s scientific community, make things up that do not make sense. Even Einstein was not happy with his theory, he tried to work it out until his dying day. For instance Neutron stars, they most likely do not exist. We know from nuclear chemistry that neutrons do not stick together, quite the opposite. They fly apart. If the evidence here is obvious and I think it is, then there is no problem with connecting cosmological and quantum physics. The connecting constant is the fourth state of matter, Plasma. Here is a much better understanding. Do you agree? http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=V026kSw4XCs&feature=related http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=S_Bh-GemFRo&feature=related http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=JxGT9CQVkDk&feature=related http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=4uf8-CZAWsI&feature=related JQ
Oh dear, the first section gets fundamental physics wrong from the outset. I know this is a watered down documentary style production, BUT as they are proposing alternatives to accepted, tested, and well modelled physics, they MUST get the basics right, or look like total loons. But they don't, and so, look like loons.
I'm curious, which fundamental or fundamentals of physics were wrong Phlog?...I found many interesting correlations with this proposed theory so am curious to note what fundamental/s you picked up on that are incorrect. Thanks.
The statement 'only electrical currents can make a magnetic field'. In a permanent magnet there is no current flow, but there is a definite magnetic field. While this is a property of the electrons around the atoms in the magnet, they are not flowing, so there is no 'current'. Also, the Earth's magnetic field, while a dynamo effect, any movement of electrons is local to the core, and a property of the Earth spinning, moving those electrons in the molten sections, so the magnetic field is the result of a current due to physical motion, and that motion was started off by gravitational attraction, and therefore cannot be over unity, and therefore can only account for less output than the angular momentum of the system (or it would come to rest), which gravitation predicts nicely. At the start, they say how much stronger electrical charges are, but these things are bound by other factors, and I'm not going to listen through all four parts if they are going to make sweeping statements, and attempt to contradict things that we know work with current models. That's a waste of time. When you jump, you fall back to Earth because of your mass, not your charge, so it's case closed on that, I think.
That is retarded. Neutrons always stick together. It's called the atom ever hear of it? Neutrons and protons are stuck together with electrons around them. Neutrons stick together. The only remotely correct part of that statement is nuclear science. The atoms are obliterated in a nuclear reaction and the atoms and some neutrons form a smaller kind of atom and the 10 some odd left over neutrons fly around and ram other atoms creating the same effect over and over. Neutrons and protons do stick together. And plasma aka the fourth state of matter means achieving a ridiculously high amount of heat which would be difficult for even some of the largest stars.
In general some of the electrons in the iron are spinning around the nucleus. Therefore there is a rotary electrical current. The current is flowing and the product is a magnetic field. From my Dot-Wave theory, if you look at the electrons moving in orbit, you will find plus dot-waves moving in a perpendicular plane to the motion and minus dot-waves moving in the perpendicular plane opposite in difeciton to the plus dot-waves. The moving dot-waves are the magnetic field. Thus an electron in a wire or within the atom has a magnetic field perpendicular to the motion of the electron. In magnitized iron, all the electron motions tend to be synchronized. Thus they all align to produce a total magnetic field.
Magnetic domains do not equal an electrical current though, so the claim made in the film, is wrong. Also, electrons don't really orbit in nice little circles. do they?
They may not be nice little circles but the electrons spin around the atoms. In addition they spin on their axis. Then internally the dot-waves which comprise the electrons in my theory spin on their axis. So there are lots of spins which produce various magnetic fields. The dot-waves which comprize the electron are charges when stationary and moving point magnetic sources when moving. Thus an electrical charge is identical with a magnetic field except the charge is stationary while the magnetic field operates at light speed C. Since everything is in constant motion a charge is constantly a magnetic field. When an object moves at 100 miles per hour, the dot-waves are stationary, then they move (one at a time) at light speed C, then they are stationary again. When a mass dot-wave moves it is a photonic dot wave. When a charge dot-wave moves it is a magnetic dot wave. A plus dot-wave and a minus dot-wave combine to produce a bipolar (massy) dot wave. In any event the electric field and the magnetic field are duals of each other. If you have one, you have the other.
