-
11-30-08, 11:52 AM #1Banned
- Posts
- 3,288
Question About Mass
Q: Is it possible for something with no mass to move something that has mass?
-
11-30-08, 12:13 PM #2
-
11-30-08, 12:17 PM #3Banned
- Posts
- 3,288
-
11-30-08, 12:17 PM #4
-
11-30-08, 12:17 PM #5
-
11-30-08, 12:21 PM #6Banned
- Posts
- 3,288
-
11-30-08, 12:21 PM #7
Before you ask: 1923 by Arthur Compton.
http://www.aip.org/history/gap/Compton/01_Compton.html
-
11-30-08, 12:22 PM #8
-
11-30-08, 12:27 PM #9
-
11-30-08, 12:28 PM #10Banned
- Posts
- 3,288
-
11-30-08, 12:28 PM #11
-
11-30-08, 12:31 PM #12Banned
- Posts
- 3,288
-
11-30-08, 12:36 PM #13
Do you read your own references?
The law of "matter" conservation (in the sense of conservation of particles) may be considered as an approximate physical law that holds only in the classical sense before the advent of special relativity and quantum mechanics. Mass is also not generally conserved in open systems, when various forms of energy are allowed into, or out of, the system. However, the law of mass conservation for closed systems, as viewed from their center of momentum inertial frames, continues to hold in modern physics.
-
11-30-08, 12:45 PM #14Banned
- Posts
- 3,288
Why did physicists rewrite the momentum equation for photons?
Last edited by OilIsMastery; 11-30-08 at 02:31 PM.
-
11-30-08, 02:13 PM #15
-
11-30-08, 02:17 PM #16
-
11-30-08, 02:21 PM #17
how does one see conservation of momentum from this statement?
-
11-30-08, 02:23 PM #18Banned
- Posts
- 3,288
-
11-30-08, 02:38 PM #19
Here's a clue (because this is painful, like watching a fish gasping and flopping in the bottom of a boat).
p=mv doesn't state the conservation of momentum.
It's the clasically derived equation for calculating the momentum of a massive body.
It's a special case of a broader equation that is valid only in a small set of situations.
-
11-30-08, 02:40 PM #20Banned
- Posts
- 3,288
Similar Threads
-
By James R in forum Physics & MathLast Post: 08-14-09, 02:02 PMReplies: 2213
-
By Michael in forum Religion ArchivesLast Post: 10-06-08, 01:50 PMReplies: 44
-
By StMartin in forum Physics & MathLast Post: 05-09-08, 01:13 AMReplies: 69
-
By Farsight in forum Pseudoscience ArchiveLast Post: 05-10-07, 10:55 AMReplies: 9
-
By Prosoothus in forum Physics & MathLast Post: 06-08-06, 07:01 AMReplies: 821



Bookmarks