-
11-08-08, 07:54 PM #1
Hamtastic for President 2012!
I've decided to begin the campaign now. Since I don't know what all the issues are, please ask and I'll form a position on it.
#1: Marijuana and Cocaine legalized, possession of other drugs decriminalized. Marijuana and Cocaine would be available to purchase at government owned shops. It would be a closed government loop, with much production going on in underground bunkers via hydroponics.
#2: Marriage would be made superfluous. A union could be entered into at any courthouse between any two objects. Marriage would be a ceremony for religious officials.
#3: Defense spending would be raised to 2008 levels, with more attention focused on space-based weaponry and robotic weapons.
#4: A hard line will be taken with regards to Foreign Policy. Mexico and Canada stand to be annexed, possibly followed by military action to take all of South America.
#5: Illegal Aliens would be allowed to be hunted for sport with an appropriate license.
#6: A law to govern all mass media would be emplaced, requiring disclaimers to be put on any story that has not been found to be accurate.
#7: Voting would be made compulsory, with an additional tax if you had no voting receipt.
What else should I develop my platform on?
I know this got cessed from politics, but I think this will do to get the word out. I'm planning a grass-roots campaign.
-
11-08-08, 07:59 PM #2
#8: Universal Health Care will be available to citizens on a work-credit basis.
#9: Money will be changed over to credits and made electronic
#10: Scannable chips will be implanted into every citizen, without which, no commercial transaction can be made.
#11: Military service will be required for 2 years for everyone turning 18.
#12: The tax law will be simplified-10% flat tax on all income, no exceptions, no refunds.
-
11-08-08, 08:02 PM #3
I can never tell how serious you are about anything.
I guess you like it that way, huh?
-
11-08-08, 08:05 PM #4
-
11-08-08, 08:08 PM #5
This is deadly serious. I could be your next president elect! I'll be 36 just in time!
-
11-08-08, 08:10 PM #6
-
11-08-08, 08:35 PM #7
possably a good move with weed however the other drugs have a very high cost to sociaty. If we were to take achole as a base line of harm and cost to the community we are willing to accept for personal freedom drugs like ice symply dont cut it. They impose HUGE burdens on the health system comparitive to achole when the useage levels are taken into acount. I do however agree that drug use should be treated PURLY as a health issue rather than as a law and order one
the 2nd part of this is just silly, while i do agree that removing the word "marrage" from all legislation will have the desired effect of pulling the teeth of the religious right to suggest that anything can be concidered to be in a legally binding contract is stupid. No person under 18 can sign a contract currently (with only a couple of exceptions) and no animal, plant or inanimate object can sign one at all. There are oviously issues to concider about power and manipulation in insestuas relationships but i cant see an issue with applying these principles to homosexuals and poligamy though for poligamy i would stipulate that BOTH people in the existing arangement must agree#2: Marriage would be made superfluous. A union could be entered into at any courthouse between any two objects. Marriage would be a ceremony for religious officials.
There are treaties which provent the militrization of space for a start#3: Defense spending would be raised to 2008 levels, with more attention focused on space-based weaponry and robotic weapons.
this would cause the anhialation of the US, the commonwealth is a more binding aliance than the UK, US one or ANZUS#4: A hard line will be taken with regards to Foreign Policy. Mexico and Canada stand to be annexed, possibly followed by military action to take all of South America.
this breaches the international convention on civil and political rights and would cause a war aganist the US#5: Illegal Aliens would be allowed to be hunted for sport with an appropriate license.
this is currently being concidered in fiji i think, and i will wait to see how their legislation pans out before commenting but i belive this would run a foul of the first ammendment#6: A law to govern all mass media would be emplaced, requiring disclaimers to be put on any story that has not been found to be accurate.
got no problem with this, compulsery voting has been in effect in australia for along time though this needs to be coupled with good education in citzianship#7: Voting would be made compulsory, with an additional tax if you had no voting receipt.
then its not universal is it?
what sort of protection from the monetry system being hacked would you put in place?#9: Money will be changed over to credits and made electronic
you do realise this is the US your talking about dont you?#10: Scannable chips will be implanted into every citizen, without which, no commercial transaction can be made.
what about the people like me who would jump ship to the other side if the millatry action was immoral?#11: Military service will be required for 2 years for everyone turning 18.
you do realise this would shift the tax benifit onto the poor to a greater percentage than the wealthy dont you?#12: The tax law will be simplified-10% flat tax on all income, no exceptions, no refunds.
-
11-08-08, 08:52 PM #8
I agree with legalization of weed and other non-processed, non-chemical drugs. I don’t think they should be restricted to government manufacturing. Why underground? I should be able to grow my own weed, and it should also be sold in stores – though heavily taxed with the proceeds earmarked for healthcare costs. It should also be restricted to use in private homes and strict penalties shold be enforced for driving under the influence – with proceeds going to healthcare costs. There should also be a national tax on alcohol and other dangerous substances – again, earmarked for healcare.
Any two objects? That’s just ridiculous. Any two humans? I agree. All civil unions, regardless of sex, and lave “marriage” to the religions.
Couldn’t disagree more. Take a step more towards (though not complete) isolationism. Protect our borders and only engage in defensive wars and UN approved and driven peace-keeping activities. Take that huge budget and make all education – up to an including a first PhD free. Support our troops by bringing them home and educating them.
Nonsense. We should be a global citizen, not bully. Cooperation will bring an end to world problems, not warfare. Just like domestic policy – throwing offenders in jail is the easy way out and solves nothing. Understand the causes of the problems and address them.
I am just going to assume – and hope – you are not serious about that.
Do you really want the state to decide what information is disseminated? I don’t. Though I would like to see all “news” companies required to be not-for-profit, if there is a feasible way to do that.
Why? Why would you want people who don’t care just pushing whatever button to not get fined? I think it should be encouraged, and I have pointed out how I think that can be done in the “Revamp the Electoral College” thread in politics.
I’d need more details to make a determination.
I would want to see just the opposite.
Disgusting thought.
Why?
I don’t know what the number should be, but I stand behind a flat tax, assuming corporate tax reform is included in the package. Abolish the IRS.
-
11-08-08, 08:54 PM #9
-
11-08-08, 09:01 PM #10
one raven no matter how it is structured a flat tax penelises the poor more than the ritch
say we aboslutly abolish all other taxes and go with hams statement that no concessions or anything else would be alowed
Now we have 2 people
1 earns $100 a week
the other $100,000 a week
the first would be left with $90 a week where as the second would be left with $90,000 a week
Now who do you think is going to notice the missing 10% more? who is going to find the 10% more of a burden?Last edited by Asguard; 11-08-08 at 09:01 PM. Reason: edit to fix the fact that i used 20% not 10, my mestake
-
11-08-08, 09:12 PM #11
This is why I said it depends on how it is structured.
Say we don't and we institute a tax plan that places a greater burden on the coprorations and institute a VAT system.
Say we institute a national sales tax in which food is not taxed at all and the more luxurious and suprfluous an item is the more taxes are paid on it.
Then you have the aspect of how the taxes are spent.
Say we institute tarriffs and use that money to address issues regarding infrastructure, education and housing?
In addition, states have their own tax systems - completely sepearate from the federal tax system, in which greater taxes can be exercised on the rich to balance the class divide in their own states.
What a lot of people from other countries don't realize is the level of independence of the states.
Think of each state as a country and the Federal Government as the EU.
Do you want your taxes going to address the social needs of Italy or your own country?
Sure, give Italy some aid in times of need, but your taxes should generally support your citizens.
IF, as you said, we abolished all other taxes and only had a flat income tax, THEN it may create a greater burden on the poor, but the worls is not that simple.
-
11-08-08, 10:10 PM #12
-
11-08-08, 10:25 PM #13
-
11-08-08, 10:28 PM #14
-
11-08-08, 10:29 PM #15
Mr. Hamtastic just ask your kids if they would ever vote for you to be president.
-
11-09-08, 04:29 AM #16
-
11-09-08, 04:32 AM #17
-
11-09-08, 04:49 AM #18
Set up a presidential debate in the Politics forum with a poll and we will take questions from the audience.
-
11-09-08, 04:51 AM #19
Shouldn't you make your position known so that they can form questions to appropriately harass us with?
-
11-09-08, 04:56 AM #20
I am leaving work soon, and will have to log off.
I'll tell you what.
Start a presidential debate thread for the two of us in Politics with an opening statement and formal address outlining your campaign to the crowd.
Later today, when I wake up, I will post my opening statement and we will ask the audience for one question at a time.
We will ask string's assistance as the moderator and he will post a poll when he feels the debate is over.
No follow-up questions from the audience, but string can post follow-up questions if he sees fit.
How does that sound?
Similar Threads
-
By Mr. Hamtastic in forum The CesspoolLast Post: 11-08-08, 09:42 PMReplies: 5
-
By Arrole in forum Free ThoughtsLast Post: 10-28-08, 07:56 PMReplies: 34
-
By Gryzalazar in forum Pseudoscience ArchiveLast Post: 08-25-08, 07:24 PMReplies: 52
-
By krokah in forum Pseudoscience ArchiveLast Post: 08-13-08, 12:21 AMReplies: 33
-
By theoneiuse in forum The CesspoolLast Post: 06-29-08, 05:33 AMReplies: 5

Reply With Quote

Bookmarks