Worse for the country: Republicans or AIDS?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by spidergoat, Sep 14, 2008.

?

Worse for the nation?

  1. Republicans are definitely worse.

    2 vote(s)
    20.0%

  2. The AIDS epidemic is worse than Republican rule.

    2 vote(s)
    20.0%

  3. Both are equally bad.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  4. Can't decide which is worse.

    2 vote(s)
    20.0%

  5. This poll is pointless.

    4 vote(s)
    40.0%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 1 of 2
  1. spidergoat

    spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Which is worse for the USA, Republicans or AIDS? I would argue the Republicans are worse, because at least there are treatments for AIDS now.
     
    spidergoat, Sep 14, 2008
    #1

  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. otheadp

    otheadp Banned Banned

    Messages:
    5,853
    SG, I had no idea you were so far left...
     
    otheadp, Sep 14, 2008
    #2

  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. S.A.M.

    S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    What if it were Republicans with AIDS? Considering how many are in the closet?

    Can't decide which is worse.
     
    S.A.M., Sep 14, 2008
    #3

  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Carcano

    Carcano Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,865
    Which has slaughtered more innocent people?
     
    Carcano, Sep 14, 2008
    #4
  8. cosmictraveler

    cosmictraveler Be kind to yourself always. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    33,264
    The media for they perpetuate lies, corruption and violence.
     
    cosmictraveler, Sep 14, 2008
    #5
  9. Killjoy

    Killjoy Propelling The Farce!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,295
    Perhaps, but just like voting for Democrats, the treatments for AIDS are merely paliative.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Killjoy, Sep 14, 2008
    #6
  10. spidergoat

    spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Cazzo made me do it.
     
    spidergoat, Sep 14, 2008
    #7
  11. OilIsMastery

    OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    This thread is blatant trolling and belongs in the cesspool.

    Republicans are much worse for the country because they are too left-wing.

    Since when is AIDS bad? Thank God for AIDS.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    I own you at trolling.
     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2008
    OilIsMastery, Sep 14, 2008
    #8
  12. whitewolf

    whitewolf asleep under the juniper bush Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,112
    I think the worst for America is the hysteria stirred up among voters by headlines like "Lipstick on the Pig!!" and "AIDS or Democrats??" and "Obama said wha??" and "Taking a #2!!" Get my drift?
     
    whitewolf, Sep 14, 2008
    #9
  13. superstring01

    superstring01 Moderator

    Messages:
    12,110
    OilIsMastery is banned for seven days for abusive language and flaming.
     
    superstring01, Sep 14, 2008
    #10
  14. S.A.M.

    S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Okay, after careful reconsideration, I have to say Republicans. Nobody wants more of the same thing after getting AIDS, they actually seek a cure or treatment.
     
    S.A.M., Sep 14, 2008
    #11
  15. superstring01

    superstring01 Moderator

    Messages:
    12,110
    Not to mention that AIDS isn't really a "growing" epidemic, per se. The nation doesn't really run the risk of annihilation at the hands of AIDS. Political parties, however, can take the nation down that road rather easily.

    ~STring
     
    superstring01, Sep 14, 2008
    #12
  16. Killjoy

    Killjoy Propelling The Farce!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,295
    Problem is, the sole readily available "cure" for Republicans is voting Democrat, which is sort of like taking that old time remedy for syphilis which contained mercury and/or arsenic.
     
    Killjoy, Sep 14, 2008
    #13
  17. S.A.M.

    S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    As opposed to getting sicker with AIDS. Hmm, must be a difficult decision.
     
    S.A.M., Sep 14, 2008
    #14
  18. Buffalo Roam

    Buffalo Roam Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,931
    Democrats.
     
    Buffalo Roam, Sep 14, 2008
    #15
  19. otheadp

    otheadp Banned Banned

    Messages:
    5,853
    Actually, one of Bush's hugest accomplishments is increasing aid to Africa to combat AIDS. Google that shit up. Even Bob Geldoff chastised the media for not mentioning how Bush helped in the anti AIDS efforts.
     
    otheadp, Sep 14, 2008
    #16
  20. S.A.M.

    S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    US aid? Never comes without strings attached.

    Very bad in the long run

    http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/12/15/opinion/edwere.php
     
    S.A.M., Sep 14, 2008
    #17
  21. Buffalo Roam

    Buffalo Roam Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,931
    Neither does Islam's, ask the people of Iraq.
     
    Buffalo Roam, Sep 14, 2008
    #18
  22. Cazzo

    Cazzo Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,031
    At least my threads make some sense.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2008
    Cazzo, Sep 14, 2008
    #19
  23. Killjoy

    Killjoy Propelling The Farce!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,295
    The thing is, you die either way.

    With the latter, you just get a period of surreal euphoria which makes you believe you've solved the problem before the toxins in the "remedy" kill you.

    :mufc:
     
    Killjoy, Sep 15, 2008
    #20
Page 1 of 2
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page