Why Is The Moon Not Spinning Then?

[Pincho Paxton]

See?
Wrong on that too.

Well I guess that your psychic ability gives you a slight edge.

[Dywyddyr]

Well I guess that your psychic ability gives you a slight edge.

Oh, TWO mistakes in that.
Compared to you I have more than a slight edge.
And I'm not psychic. Only cranks believe they are, can't happen in real life.

[Pincho Paxton]

Oh, TWO mistakes in that.
Compare to you I have more than a slight edge.
And I'm not psychic. Only cranks believe they are, can't happen in real life.

You first example contradicts not only itself, but also your second example. You have created your own contradiction wormhole.

[Dywyddyr]

You first example contradicts not only itself, but also your second example. You have created your own contradiction wormhole.

You mean you also have trouble with the English language?
Or just comprehension.
There is no contradiction.

[Pincho Paxton]

You mean you also have trouble with the English language?
Or just comprehension.
There is no contradiction.

It only takes an IQ of about 110 to see it.

[Dywyddyr]

It only takes an IQ of about 110 to see it.

That would explain it then.
I'm not lowering mine for anyone.

[Pincho Paxton]

That would explain it then.
I'm not lowering mine for anyone.

DOh!, that's another contradiction.

[Dywyddyr]

DOh!, that's another contradiction.

Also wrong.
Try this: someone clever sees what is written.
Someone not so clever has comprehension problems and sees what isn't written, but simply interprets it to the best of their limited ability.
get it?

[Pincho Paxton]

Also wrong.
Try this: someone clever sees what is written.
Someone not so clever has comprehension problems and sees what isn't written, but simply interprets it to the best of their limited ability.
get it?

............... so what happens if you didn't see what was written 4 times over in a row?

[Pincho Paxton]

You may yet implode in you own black hole.

[Dywyddyr]

............... so what happens if you didn't see what was written 4 times over in a row?

I wouldn't want to imply you were quite that dumb.
I'm polite like that.

[Pincho Paxton]

I wouldn't want to imply you were quite that dumb.
I'm polite like that.

Oh a post that works.. great! Now you may reach the required level to re-examine you previous posts.

[Dywyddyr]

So you're still having comprehension problems?
I should have known.

[Pincho Paxton]

So you're still having comprehension problems?
I should have known.

Back to psychic prediction.. Ok I can see we are back to square 1.

[Billy T]

This thread had very little merit from the start. Now it has none. Close it.

[Ophiolite]

This thread had very little merit from the start. Now it has none. Close it.

Seconded with great vigour.

[cluelusshusbund]

Close it.

Billy has spoken... "chop chop".!!!

[common_sense_seeker]

A long thread. All of you looking at lots of different points of relativity. The Sun, the Earth. I like the part where the planets revolve around the moon when you are standing on it. Even without finding a stationary object in the Milky Way the planets orbiting the moon give you a high percentage chance that the moon is spinning. I would prefer the Black hole at the centre of the Milky Way as the slightly highest possibility of stationary, but yeah, the planets would not spin around the moon without some very odd physics going on. So that concluded it for me. The moon spins.

You sound like and intelligent guy with a capacity for lateral thinking, unlike the many others incidentally. What do you make of the bombshell suggestion that the reason for the moon moving further away is due to internal tidal friction caused by a non-baryonic innermost core of the moon (as opposed to the mainstream idea of induced angular momentum from the earth's gravity)? Is it conceivably possible in your mind that Newton missed this possibility for the earth's tides being caused by the gravity gradient across the sphere as well as a 'matter gradient' from the center to the surface? i.e. the earth also has a non-baryonic innermost core.

[Pincho Paxton]

You sound like and intelligent guy with a capacity for lateral thinking, unlike the many others incidentally. What do you make of the bombshell suggestion that the reason for the moon moving further away is due to internal tidal friction caused by a non-baryonic innermost core of the moon (as opposed to the mainstream idea of induced angular momentum from the earth's gravity)? Is it conceivably possible in your mind that Newton missed this possibility for the earth's tides being caused by the gravity gradient across the sphere as well as a 'matter gradient' from the center to the surface? i.e. the earth also has a non-baryonic innermost core.

To be honest with you, you wouldn't like my answer. I have gravity as a pressure wave, and not a pulling force, so although you may be thinking about this the right way, you have gravity travelling in the opposite direction to me. And I don't think that my gravity transition will be accepted for a long time, unless science ever finds the Aether. Anyway, I would have the moon relieving the pressure wave on the Earth. Causing a sort of rebound wave like the tidal waves between two continents.

[common_sense_seeker]

Okay, I understand what you mean. I'm a non-Aether guy myself. Good luck with the sciforums crowd, you'll need it. I like your other threads by the way. When I get the animation of my 'build-up before the big bang' concept completed I'll come back and show you sometime.