+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 174

Thread: What's wrong with women?

  1. #21
    Valued Senior Member Carcano's Avatar
    Posts
    6,698
    Quote Originally Posted by visceral_instinct View Post
    If you don't like the sight of my facial piercings, does that mean I've committed a crime against you?
    Yes, very much so...in the same way that defecating on the sidewalk is an aesthetic crime.

    Or even having my house surrounded by neon billboards.

    A society that has lost its sense of aesthetic integrity is no longer a civilization.

  2. #22
    Valued Senior Member
    Posts
    6,226
    Quote Originally Posted by clusteringflux View Post
    Now,I'm a bit of a hermit , but after spending a few days at Oho's largest county fair (hundreds of thousands of people) I'm in shock.

    I'm now convinced that a LARGE percentage of ladies from young girls to mid aged women would walk around totally nude if they could get away with it.

    Acre after acre of perfectly tanned tush of all ages covered only by teeny tiny boxer pajamas riding high and low in all the right spots.
    You realize, of course, that someone from the Victorian era would probably be scandalized and say exactly the same sorts of things if he/she saw a woman wearing shorts and a T-shirt in public? A modern person from Saudi Arabia might react the same way to a woman in public without a burka.

    It's all based on the idea that there's something inherently bad/shameful about the human body and sexuality.

  3. #23
    Valued Senior Member Carcano's Avatar
    Posts
    6,698
    Quote Originally Posted by Nasor View Post
    You realize, of course, that someone from the Victorian era would probably be scandalized and say exactly the same sorts of things if he/she saw a woman wearing shorts and a T-shirt in public?
    And yet the Victorians has no qualms about depicting nudity in their art...taking after classical models.

  4. #24
    Monkey see, monkey denigrate visceral_instinct's Avatar
    Posts
    7,918
    Quote Originally Posted by Carcano View Post
    Yes, very much so...in the same way that defecating on the sidewalk is an aesthetic crime.

    Or even having my house surrounded by neon billboards.

    A society that has lost its sense of aesthetic integrity is no longer a civilization.
    Defecating on the sidewalk is wrong because someone could fucking STEP in it.

    And do bodily decorations really equate to neon billboards? You can avert your eyes if you really don't like them.

    Also: WHO THE FUCK DEFINES AESTHETIC INTEGRITY??!!! I think long head hair and lots of facial hair on a guy is attractive, some people think that's vile.

    Can I decide that you're committing a crime by wearing a certain piece of clothing and demand that you don't wear it because it's a crime against me?

  5. #25
    Valued Senior Member
    Posts
    6,226
    Quote Originally Posted by Carcano View Post
    And yet the Victorians has no qualms about depicting nudity in their art...taking after classical models.
    True, but they would have found the idea of a woman walking around in public wearing shorts and a T-shirt quite indecent and slutty looking.

  6. #26
    Valued Senior Member Carcano's Avatar
    Posts
    6,698
    Quote Originally Posted by visceral_instinct View Post
    WHO THE FUCK DEFINES AESTHETIC INTEGRITY??!!!
    We could say the same about any form of right vs. wrong.

    Should we abandon the principle of ethics altogther...simply because a few criminals will dissent?

    Should we abandon having tests in school because a few kids will fail?

  7. #27
    Whose Worth's unknown Cellar_Door's Avatar
    Posts
    1,310
    clustering_flux, I do sympathise with you - fourteen year-old girls who walk around with 'J-U-I-C-Y' on their bikini bottoms and shout 'fucking perve!' at anyone man happens to be in the vicinity annoy almost everybody.

    The thing is, most teenage boys (and builders) often take their tops off in hot weather and no-one seems to care when they walk down the street. However, if a girl paraded around the streets wearing a bikini top and shorts, eyebrows would be raised.

  8. #28
    Monkey see, monkey denigrate visceral_instinct's Avatar
    Posts
    7,918
    Quote Originally Posted by Carcano View Post
    We could say the same about any form of right vs. wrong.

    Should we abandon the principle of ethics altogther...simply because a few criminals will dissent?

    Should we abandon having tests in school because a few kids will fail?
    You can't apply right and wrong to what clothes someone wears and what bodily decorations to wear. However much you might dislike someone else's aesthetics, they're not actually harming you.

    Otherwise I could claim that someone is 'harming' me because they're wearing an ugly piece of clothing.

    The thing is, most teenage boys (and builders) often take their tops off in hot weather and no-one seems to care when they walk down the street. However, if a girl paraded around the streets wearing a bikini top and shorts, eyebrows would be raised.
    I AGREE.

    For some reason the male body is seen foremost as functional, whereas the female body is seen foremost as sexual.

    Which sucks, because when you live in a body every day and you use it for walking, running, eating, shitting etc. it's hard to see yourself as firstly sexual.

    Me thinks I'll start a thread on this one....

  9. #29
    Valued Senior Member Carcano's Avatar
    Posts
    6,698
    Quote Originally Posted by visceral_instinct View Post
    You can't apply right and wrong to what clothes someone wears and what bodily decorations to wear.
    Sure you can...just as New Yorkers reacted with outrage to the first proposed design for the Freedom Tower in Manhattan. It was just plain ugly.

    People react very strongly when you destroy the aesthetics of their environment...with good reason.

    Take a walk through a furniture store. Most of the time, money and energy spent by the carpenters is on aesthetics...not functionality.

  10. #30
    Monkey see, monkey denigrate visceral_instinct's Avatar
    Posts
    7,918
    Quote Originally Posted by Carcano View Post
    Sure you can...just as New Yorkers reacted with outrage to the first proposed design for the Freedom Tower in Manhattan. It was just plain ugly.

    People react very strongly when you destroy the aesthetics of their environment...with good reason.

    Take a walk through a furniture store. Most of the time, money and energy spent by the carpenters is on aesthetics...not functionality.
    Towers, sidewalks etc. belong to everyone, therefore everyone has a right to a say in what their aesthetics are like.

    Someone's body is theirs and theirs alone.

  11. #31
    Valued Senior Member Carcano's Avatar
    Posts
    6,698
    Quote Originally Posted by visceral_instinct View Post
    Someone's body is theirs and theirs alone.
    The way you look affect others as well...which is why we have dress codes for schools, restaurants, church, the military, and the workplace.

  12. #32
    Monkey see, monkey denigrate visceral_instinct's Avatar
    Posts
    7,918
    Quote Originally Posted by Carcano View Post
    The way you look affect others as well...which is why we have dress codes for schools, restaurants, church, the military, and the workplace.
    There's a difference between that and the assumptions people make when they see you walking down the street.

    If you judge someone by how they look, that's not you being 'affected' by them. You're not a blank slate, incapable of reflecting on your own thoughts and thinking things out. If I see someone in Nikes and tacky hoop earrings and judge them to be an unsavoury person because of that, that's my fault, not theirs. They could be a very wise and kind person for all I know.

    And really, the same applies in schools and the workplace. It's just that teachers/bosses, delete as appropriate, have the power to kick you out if you won't take out your 3 spiked labret studs.

  13. #33
    Valued Senior Member Carcano's Avatar
    Posts
    6,698
    Quote Originally Posted by visceral_instinct View Post
    If I see someone in Nikes and tacky hoop earrings and judge them to be an unsavoury person because of that, that's my fault, not theirs. They could be a very wise and kind person for all I know.
    If I see someone plastered with advertising and metal pins stuck in their face...this reveals much about the person inside.

    There is nobody home behind their eyes.

  14. #34
    Heute der Enteteich... Oli's Avatar
    Posts
    11,890
    Quote Originally Posted by Carcano View Post
    If I see someone plastered with advertising and metal pins stuck in their face...this reveals much about the person inside.

    There is nobody home behind their eyes.

    Wrong.

  15. #35
    Monkey see, monkey denigrate visceral_instinct's Avatar
    Posts
    7,918
    Quote Originally Posted by Carcano View Post
    If I see someone plastered with advertising and metal pins stuck in their face...this reveals much about the person inside.

    There is nobody home behind their eyes.
    That's YOUR OWN judgement, and may or may not tally with the reality.

    I wear metal in my face as a decoration, not because I have an emotional problem, or, as you less formally put it, nobody home behind my eyes.

  16. #36
    Monkey see, monkey denigrate visceral_instinct's Avatar
    Posts
    7,918
    Quote Originally Posted by Oli View Post

    Wrong.
    ^Yay. Finally a sane person just arrived on the scene.

  17. #37
    Valued Senior Member Carcano's Avatar
    Posts
    6,698
    Quote Originally Posted by visceral_instinct View Post
    I wear metal in my face as a decoration, not because I have an emotional problem...
    Its a decoration of ugliness...a common manifestation of self-hatred. Not much different than cutting yourself.

    You know the end is nigh when insanity becomes a fashion accessory.

  18. #38
    Heute der Enteteich... Oli's Avatar
    Posts
    11,890
    Quote Originally Posted by Carcano View Post
    Its a decoration of ugliness...a common manifestation of self-hatred.
    Supposedly.

    Not much different than cutting yourself.
    In your personal opinion.

    You know the end is nigh when insanity becomes a fashion accessory.
    Or prejudice a substitute for knowledge.

  19. #39
    Monkey see, monkey denigrate visceral_instinct's Avatar
    Posts
    7,918
    Quote Originally Posted by Carcano View Post
    Its a decoration of ugliness...a common manifestation of self-hatred. Not much different than cutting yourself.

    You know the end is nigh when insanity becomes a fashion accessory.
    You see what you are doing? You are taking YOUR OWN opinion of something and projecting it on to reality whether it actually fits with reality or not.

    You see it as akin to self-harming. It's really not. The object is not to hurt yourself. The object is to look good. If someone invented a way of doing facial piercings that healed instantaneously, I'd get my ass down that studio in a flash.

  20. #40
    Valued Senior Member Carcano's Avatar
    Posts
    6,698
    Quote Originally Posted by visceral_instinct View Post
    You see it as akin to self-harming. It's really not.
    Its not a 'way' of self-harming...its a 'symbol' of self-harming.

Similar Threads

  1. By cosmictraveler in forum Free Thoughts
    Last Post: 02-26-08, 07:18 AM
    Replies: 0
  2. By mountainhare in forum Free Thoughts
    Last Post: 12-13-07, 10:15 PM
    Replies: 110
  3. By Atom in forum Religion Archives
    Last Post: 11-20-07, 07:05 PM
    Replies: 171
  4. By Ganymede in forum Politics
    Last Post: 09-05-07, 01:49 PM
    Replies: 20
  5. By Buddha1 in forum Human Science
    Last Post: 05-01-06, 06:28 PM
    Replies: 1182

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •