Third of Muslim Students Back Religious Killings

This Religion of Peace Moment is brought to you by Muslims attending British universities: Third of Muslim students back killings.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

So what? Killing in the name of Islam can be justified, which is something I, as a Muslim, solemnly profess. Those who directly oppress or slaughter Muslims (especially within the confinement of their own lands) deserve to incur grievous penalties. Of course, the killing is only to take place on the battlefield; anything short of this standard is transgressive and unjustified. Killing in the name of Islam is not an invitation to blind manslaughter and collective genocide on the grounds of differing religions; no, killing in the name of Islam is understood strictly as a defensive principle. As for Shariah law, its incorporation into British law is an ingenious idea.

Kadark the Bull

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

One good thing about having left the UK is not having to deal with the PC culture reguarding minority faiths and cultures.

I wish more politicians would say "If you don't like it, get the fuck out"... or words to that effect.

In America, christianity is a lesser evil, and certainly won't allow itself to become islamosized. And yes, I know I just made that word up.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Malcolm the Tenth would've been stoned to death under Sharia Law.

 

We already know Islam supports killing, warring and lying. No other religion supports those except Islam. YOU therefore, support killing, warring and lying as a Muslim and will justify it any way you please, to suit your agenda.

Complete bullshit.

Sure, let's move back into Medieval times. I hear cave-dwelling is all the rage.

 

The peace in Iraq brought to you by the US citizens:

http://www.pollingreport.com/iraq.htm

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Your point?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

You are welcome.

 

My point is that, look into the mirror before you bash others.

 

Thank you Al Qaeda.

 

Critique against Muslims which is said by someone coming from country or belief which
has never attack other country or belief would have been acceptable. Critique coming
from YOU is full of hypocrisy. Other kills on the name of belief, you kill on the name of
democracy, the result is the same. You kill people, including the innocent ones. Shame
on you.

If I were you, I would wish to disappear.

 

that's rather easy to say isn't it. Anyway I think your post is BS but back on topic

Do you condone this?

Do you think this is anything else but absurd?

 

I take it you were against World War II. Heil Hitler mein Kamarade.

If you support terrorism so much, why don't you fly to Iraq, join Al Qaeda, and blow yourself up in a crowd of I-Raqi school girls?

 

Well as much as I disagreed with the Iraq war, it's one thing to support a war, a completely different thing to support a terrorist attack deliberately aimed at citizens.

 

I do not support terrorism either.

 

Well based on a poll of British muslims asking wether or not they condoned attacks like the 7/7 bombings, it seems that many muslims did support terrorism.

 

Eh? Al Qaeda wasn't even in Iraq until the U.S. invaded. Saddam never let them have anything to do with Iraq, since he saw them as a potential threat to his own power. Once the U.S. invaded and half the country fell into anarchy, they poured in.

 

Wrong. The US invaded Iraq BECAUSE of Al Qaeda.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...ddam-killed-Abu-Nidal-over-al-Qa'eda-row.html

Corroborate here:

http://www.husseinandterror.com/
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,48822,00.html
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/02/20030205-1.html
http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=2687
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/06/15/bush.alqaeda/
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/378fmxyz.asp
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5326544/
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/COMMUNITY/10/29/mylroie/
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2003/9/22/110207.shtml
http://i.xanga.com/dissidentfrogman/saddam-911.jpg
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2003-05-07-911-judge-awards_x.htm
http://www.archive-news.net/Articles/SH040923.html
http://www.kdp.se/old/chemical.html

 

Bush's administration tried to claim that he was killed because he wouldn't train al qaeda, but many people disagree - other sources say that he was killed by saddam because saddam found out that the U.S. had been bribing him to help with the U.S. invasion.

From wikipedia:

Half of your links didn't even mention al qeada, but other terrorist groups. You DO realize that not all terrorists=al qeada, right? Many of the ones that did mention a link were from dubious sources.

 

Is anyone on this website normal? Everyone seems to be fucking crazy :\.