-
05-13-08, 11:45 AM #61
Objective to a certain extent?
you mean there is no completely objective reality?
What does it imply?
About the deep "I", does it belong to (partially)objective reality ?
I have difficulty to understand what you mean, can you be more explicit and more rigorous (why saying objective before and now partially objective?)
-
05-13-08, 11:48 AM #62
-
05-13-08, 11:53 AM #63Ok, I'm very pleased for them. What now?it is to show that in some case when people use the word god they are in fact referring to the same thing that other people refer to when using the word "reality"
-
05-13-08, 12:01 PM #64
-
05-13-08, 12:04 PM #65
-
05-13-08, 12:08 PM #66
-
05-13-08, 12:12 PM #67
-
05-13-08, 12:44 PM #68
-
05-13-08, 01:24 PM #69What is this meaningless codswallop?When people talk of reality they really mean God; it's just that they don't know.
The word 'god' has clearly defined meaning. If you want to change it to include everything from 'the universe' to 'baked beans' then that is fine, (although idiotic), but it is not an argument that people saying "baked beans" actually mean "god" but just don't know it - except in the mind of the imbecile.
-
05-13-08, 03:14 PM #70F-in' *meow* baby!!!
- Posts
- 8,427
I don't want to say any such thing. I don't know if we'll be able to acquire that level of knowledge... but it's certainly worth a try
.
Nope. Take numbers for example. 1 is different than 2 and that difference can be seen without any 'background'.
N/A
-
05-13-08, 03:18 PM #71
-
05-13-08, 03:24 PM #72
-
05-13-08, 04:39 PM #73It is true that the meaning of words evolve but it isn't of any worth when someone merely takes one defined object, (eg an apple), and calls it something else, (eg a banana).Oh the dictionary has become rather fluid these days, everyone gets to redefine their beliefs as they see fit.
-
05-13-08, 05:04 PM #74
-
05-13-08, 07:15 PM #75
-
05-13-08, 10:20 PM #76
That was all my point: many atheist believe that they are atheist but in fact all atheist that are realists have in fact the same belief of many theist who believe in the god I described : an encompassign reality.
we should not call this guys atheist:
Einstein, Planck, St Augustine, Meister Eckhart, many sufis and hindu are theist (a particular kind) or realist (I woudl say also a particular kind because some other believe that everythng is made of particles), choose the word you prefer
-
05-13-08, 10:21 PM #77
-
05-13-08, 10:24 PM #78
-
05-13-08, 10:32 PM #79
Both of you finnally fall also in the Kantian view
which is what I was talking about.
Ok so at least for now on you cannot tell us about reality.
if you talk about the symbols "1"and "2" the background is the blank backgroudn of your screen
if you talk about numbers as such, it is interesting but I think you need at least to define the rules of number before being able to know the difference between 1 and 2 (it is a matter of your axioms and definition, in other words with your mathematical background)
going back to your description of reality, you mean that difference are difference that are in the mind (mathematical numbers) ?
-
05-13-08, 10:38 PM #80
Similar Threads
-
By S.A.M. in forum Religion ArchivesLast Post: 05-16-08, 02:49 AMReplies: 429
-
By S.A.M. in forum Religion ArchivesLast Post: 05-15-08, 10:17 AMReplies: 404
-
By BeHereNow in forum General PhilosophyLast Post: 03-28-08, 06:03 AMReplies: 1
-
By coberst in forum General PhilosophyLast Post: 02-14-08, 04:14 PMReplies: 1
-
By lightgigantic in forum Religion ArchivesLast Post: 12-13-07, 04:25 AMReplies: 393




Bookmarks