03-28-08, 05:58 AM #1
Philosophy of Science: Instrumentalism vs Realism
I'm wondering if there is a consensus on the board or one or the other position being favored?
"In the philosophy of science, instrumentalism is the view that concepts and theories are merely useful instruments whose worth is measured not by whether the concepts and theories are true or false (or correctly depict reality), but by how effective they are in explaining and predicting phenomena.
Instrumentalism relates closely to pragmatism. This methodological viewpoint often contrasts with scientific realism, which defines theories as specially being more or less true. However, instrumentalism is more of a pragmatic approach to science, information and theories than an ontological statement.
Often instrumentalists (just like pragmatists) have been accused of being relativists, even though many instrumentalists are also believers in sturdy objective realism (such as Karl Popper)."
03-28-08, 06:03 AM #2
Thank you for lightening my darkness with that lucid explanation. You omitted to mention that Karl Popper became Thomas Kuhn the day the earth stood still.
By coberst in forum General PhilosophyLast Post: 02-24-08, 10:12 AMReplies: 9
By coberst in forum General PhilosophyLast Post: 11-04-07, 06:00 AMReplies: 1
By Atom in forum Science & SocietyLast Post: 08-21-07, 11:44 PMReplies: 68
By coberst in forum General PhilosophyLast Post: 12-10-06, 12:53 PMReplies: 0
By VitalOne in forum Religion ArchivesLast Post: 11-17-06, 08:50 AMReplies: 138