I believe that a successfull strategy, in expansion of a country as well as gaining power elsewhere outside of a nation, would be to implement an assimilation of that country through fragmentation. Georgia, enemy of Russia has currently 3 different sectors within it that are fragmenting themselves independent of the country, these are Abkhazia, Adjaria, and South Ossetia. All of these regions present a very troubling reality to Georgia, they are not under full jurisdiction of Georgia nor are they under full jurisdiction of themselves. However all of these regions want to declare independence and become separate nations. From Russian Federation point of view this is a succesfull tactic in country assimilation, yet it will be hard to control these nations afterwards their fragmentation. So I have devised a succesfull plan. 1) Enemy country has fragmentation states within it seeking liberty 2) These fragmentation states are to be economically helped and secretly militarily helped 3) The states must be recognizes internationally as separate countries and granted full liberty 4) An incident must be planted within for a cause of war between the fragmented states and the now separate regions. 5) A solution to the end of the war will be presented to come for all of these states under jurisdiction of a new country (Russia Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!) Now obviously we got Chechnya incident and what played a role there were demographics of the region, the very rich oil region had reimbursed itself for the war. Another important aspect is to turn the International recognition of the subject for ones' cause. We had Finnish private snipers working in Chechnya, sniping russian snipers Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!...snipers sniping snipers...the only tactic that works. So somehow International support must be either suppressed by economically destabilizing the ability of those countries wishing to support or by turning them into allies by triggering Chechnya as an enemy of Finland (never happened...but could have been done) Every sin is remembered, every blood is repayed. Another drama of war in country assimilation tactic was used by NATO and USA again for the same cause in Yugoslavia, the tactic forementioned above worked well there. So what tactics can be employed to further destabilize the country of enemy using this fragmentation of the states scenario? :bugeye:
Currently Israel also employs this strategy and it employs it so well that it has been expanding at an amazing rate. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
The fragmentation you speak of is a natural and voluntary thing, isn't it? If those regions want separate nations, it speaks to a logical development. It's an extension of the USSR collapse. In contrast, the major separation in the occupied territories is the one between Fatah and Hamas.
well why would be natural and voluntary? Palestinians want their land back, who exactly is volunteering here? On the other hand the excuse of natural and voluntary giving back of land can only convince internationals on this issue and not the nation being suppressed. A great tactic by Israelis would be to convince through media psychological reasoning that they themselves are giving up this land for Israelis for some noble truth or yes turn in two governmental factions within this fragmented state on each other.
