The Evangelical Atheist

[James R]

Ok, fine, SAM. I'm glad you see the pointlessness of having this kind of detailed argument when you lack the basic facts.

[Gustav]

is dawkins, that ultra materialistic pseudo skeptic being rude again in these hallowed halls of truth and reason?

garcon! the gallows!

[S.A.M.]

I'll continue this discussion in the God Delusion review thread. I like Geoffs idea of reviewing the book and I'll try to add my own comments there.

Thanks for the great discussion btw.

[(Q)]

I see no reason to wade through 400 pages of the rhetoric that he continually makes in his articles and lectures.

I think I've reached the extent of debate based on Dawkins arguments from speeches etc. I can see I need to read the book to marshall further arguments. So I'll concede that I need more information and get back on this.

Now that you've finally admitted that you've been lying throughout this entire thread, would you do us all a favor by stepping down as moderator. Most certainly, I would not want a moderator who lies to the extent you do as a representative of this forum.

It is beyond shameful and you're a hypocrite and an affront to your religion.

“And do not say that of which you have no knowledge.” (Quran 17:36)

“That God may reward the truthful for their truthfulness, and punish the hypocrites if He wills, or turn mercifully towards them...” (Quran 33:24)

[(Q)]

I'll continue this discussion in the God Delusion review thread. I like Geoffs idea of reviewing the book and I'll try to add my own comments there.

Thanks for the great discussion btw.

There was no discussion with you as you did nothing but lie the entire thread. What comments could you possibly add to that other thread that wouldn't be a lie? Who the fuck do you think you are?

[sowhatifit'sdark]

And so each found value in the other's 'position'....
how odd.

[James R]

There was no discussion with you as you did nothing but lie the entire thread. What comments could you possibly add to that other thread that wouldn't be a lie? Who the fuck do you think you are?

That's a bit harsh.

[Bells]

There was no discussion with you as you did nothing but lie the entire thread. What comments could you possibly add to that other thread that wouldn't be a lie?

Where did she lie? She never hid the fact that she had not read the book and was discussing, instead, interviews and articles she had read by Dawkins or about Dawkins.

Who the fuck do you think you are?

I think that is a question you should be asking yourself Q.

[(Q)]

That's a bit harsh.

When are you guys going to do something about Sam? Or, is her conduct acceptable as a moderator?

[phlogistician]

That's a bit harsh.

Only the truth hurts.

[James R]

When are you guys going to do something about Sam? Or, is her conduct acceptable as a moderator?

If you have specific complaints about her moderation, I suggest you PM Plazma Inferno, myself or Stryder.

[GeoffP]

About that review: I'll try and get back on it. Papers, papers, grant submission. What a miserable business.