Mod Note — This topic is a splinter from "Divorce Because Of". The topic post has been copied from the original discussion. can a woman ask for divorce if her husband has little experience in sexual intercource.What is the size of the normal private part.
Notes around (excerpt) Mod Note — This is a relevant excerpt of a longer post from the original topic. Extraneous material has been removed. Well, same thing with Christianity. Culturally, though, the difference is apostasy. Says a lot about our values that in the West we simply prefer the insincere. Don't get me wrong: I'm a firm advocate of non-marital sex. And, hey, in the United States and some other nations, you can "try before you buy", so it's not purely about the religion.
It's better than your Western culture, which makes a lucrative business by exposing people's insecurities to the fullest.
It's not the Muslims who spend tens of thousands of dollars to make their dicks/breasts larger, make their noses smaller, become anorexic or bulimic, etc, simply to become the standard perception of beauty. It's the Western culture that makes people think their body isn't normal, for the sole purpose of taking their money to make them look as they're "supposed" to. Get your priorities straight.
Why is this a discussion on Islam? Anyway, Muslims can divorce for sexual incompatibility and get remarried in 40 days, so you can try try try try and then return. I know a girl who divorced a guy cos he liked the backdoor approach too much. No big deal.
I see you follow the modern (post-Christianity) form of Islam Guess we missed the revolution. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
So something is permissible in Islam because 17th-18th century Syrian societies practiced it? Oh, you Indian "Muslims" and your convenient excuses! I've said time and again I'm a traditionalist. What I see today makes me gag. Mod Note — Edit to remove personal insult.
Some traditionalist, you cannot even recognise how the Prophet treated his wives, what you are is a pseudo-Wahabi, the "traditionalists" I see today are the ones who do not recognise that women were given rights 1400 years ago that some modern societies have yet to recognise.
I know how the Prophet treated his wives like the back of my hand. And why are we diverging to women's rights here? The topic is sexual incompatibility, which is irrespective of gender, meaning men and women have equal say in the matter. Your liberal viewpoints of Islam are merely excuses to justify your pro-Western longings and lifestyle; you have no basis in saying I am not a traditionalist. Indian "Muslims" have gone from Kings to a crushed minority, all because of people like you. You notice the mote in my eye, but not the beam in yours.
Why not? Has research on the topic been done? If you want an example, look no further than Tiassa. Every now and then he likes to complain about how terrible his wife is in bed.
(Insert title here) Mod Note — This is a relevant excerpt of a longer post from the original topic. Extraneous material has been removed. You know, Kadark, at this point even I am tempted to make a point about who forces their women to cover themselves from head to toe and says it's for the benefit of their dignity. It suggests certain depths of bigotry when you're willing to be condescending about what would otherwise be common ground between you and another.
Indeed. http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSL25320251 Instead, many Muslims (in France and elsewhere) are caving in to family and social pressure and having their hymen's reconstructed. So how are they any different to women who decide to get a boob job? You were saying about making people into what they were supposed to look like Kadark?
Bells: It would never have been a problem for her if she didn't have sex with another guy before her marriage that was to happen later that year. Not surprisingly, it happened in France (a country under heavy Western influence). You were saying?