-
12-19-07, 10:47 AM #1Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 2,135
Heart Left Side - why?
Wouldn't it be better to have the heart in the middle?
or
What is the evolutionary advantage of having an asymmetrically placed heart?
-
12-19-07, 10:56 AM #2
Your sternum doesn't seem as flexible. People with gigantism get exhausted easier because the muscle mass around their heart makes it harder to pump blood fast enough, so the fact that your ribs are super flexible may have something to do with it. That's just a guess though. Also, some peopl are born with their heart on the right side I believe.
-
12-19-07, 11:13 AM #3
-
12-19-07, 11:16 AM #4Valued Senior Member
- Posts
- 9,560
-
12-19-07, 11:24 AM #5sick of it all.
- Posts
- 247
the bloodstrem has two "cycles", one: heart - lung - heart and then following heart - the body - heart. the second part is much larger and it requires more strength to get the blood circulating, since the whole body needs to be supplied. the left side of the heart is responsible for this, while the right side only needs to pump the blood to the lung and back. since the two different chamers have different requirements in terms of strength, they are built differently and therefor asymetrical...
the condition where the heart is leaning to the right side is situs inversus... all organs are mirrored
Edit: the evolutionary advantage ist we get better blood supply because the heart is optimized for the pumping capacity needed and therefor we perfom better at tasks that are physicaly demanding.
-
12-19-07, 11:32 AM #6Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 2,135
-
12-19-07, 11:34 AM #7Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 2,135
-
12-19-07, 11:36 AM #8Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 2,135
Oh, yes. Is the heart on the left in other species, especially mammals?
-
12-19-07, 11:37 AM #9
and aren't there mirror image identical twins? If so, wouldn't the heart be on the wrong side of one of them?
-
12-19-07, 11:41 AM #10
The heart is, itself, symmetrical, but its an individual organ rather than one that comes in a pair (like kidneys, eyes, testicles, etc). As such it has to occupy the space in the chest cavity somewhere -so why not slightly to the owner's left? Slightly to the right are liver and gall bladder, also individual organs, though not quite as large as the heart.
Overall, the heart is well located. It may be that there's an evolutionary advantage to having it slightly to the left since most humans are right-side dominant and this might afford a bit more protection since the right side may have been first to encounter dangerous circumstances. But I'm completely speculating off-the-cuff and have nothing to base that on.
-
12-20-07, 02:12 AM #11
-
12-20-07, 03:43 AM #12Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 2,135
Sounds possible.
I just found this, said by some guy - so I make no claims to his authority, on the internet.
In mammals, the aorta (the major artery carrying blood to the body) bends to the specimen's left side. In birds and reptiles, the aorta bends to the specimen¹s right side. This alteration reflects a difference in the evolution of these two types of vertebrates from a common, more fish-like ancestor. That is the difference you are wondering about.
HERE IS THE COMPLICATED EXPLANATION:
Generally, the heart of vertebrates lies in the approximate center of the thoracic (chest) cavity. For fish this is generally perfect because the pattern of circulation is symmetrical about the heart (the gills are exactly the same on both sides). In other vertebrates in which the primitive (reflected in the early embryo) pattern is reorganized to accommodate the lungs, the altered pattern of major vessels tends to give the appearance of the heart being set to the right or left in the thorax (chest cavity).
-
12-20-07, 04:00 AM #13Registered Senior Member
- Posts
- 2,135
This article does not directly address my question but is nevertheless fascinating:
HARVARD GAZETTE ARCHIVES
How your heart got where it is:
Electricity shapes your body
http://www.hno.harvard.edu/gazette/2...4/01-hand.html
It is focusing on how we end up being asymmetrical and (not so)recent indications that small electric fields may cause this. I found the last section most interesting about the regeneration of body parts.
Similar Threads
-
By Angelus in forum Art & CultureLast Post: 05-09-13, 11:21 PMReplies: 1827
-
By Cris in forum Religion ArchivesLast Post: 06-17-08, 10:48 AMReplies: 425
-
By eanassir in forum Pseudoscience ArchiveLast Post: 05-06-07, 02:59 AMReplies: 35
-
By darksidZz in forum Art & CultureLast Post: 04-12-07, 07:36 PMReplies: 3

Reply With Quote


Bookmarks